Skip to content

Add UAC privilege check signature for process tokens#542

Open
kevross33 wants to merge 1 commit intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
kevross33:patch-131291
Open

Add UAC privilege check signature for process tokens#542
kevross33 wants to merge 1 commit intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
kevross33:patch-131291

Conversation

@kevross33
Copy link
Contributor

Example Conti ransomware
image

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new Cuckoo Sandbox signature designed to identify malicious behavior related to privilege escalation. Specifically, it targets the detection of processes attempting to determine their User Account Control (UAC) elevation status or verify Administrator group membership, a common tactic used by malware, including ransomware, to assess its privileges.

Highlights

  • New Cuckoo Signature for UAC Checks: A new Cuckoo Sandbox signature, 'PrivilegeElevationCheck', has been added to detect attempts by processes to query their UAC elevation status or check for Administrator privileges using Windows API calls like 'NtQueryInformationToken', 'GetTokenInformation', and 'CheckTokenMembership'.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • modules/signatures/windows/bypass_uac_privilegecheck.py
    • Added a new Cuckoo signature 'PrivilegeElevationCheck' to detect UAC and administrator privilege checks.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new signature, PrivilegeElevationCheck, to detect when a process queries for its token information to check for administrator privileges or UAC elevation status. The implementation is clear and correctly identifies the relevant API calls and parameters. I've provided a few suggestions to improve code readability, maintainability, and add a minor performance optimization.

self.ret = False

def on_call(self, call, process):
api = call["api"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For a minor performance improvement, you can add an early exit at the beginning of this method. Once a match is found and self.ret is set to True, there's no need to process subsequent API calls.

        if self.ret:
            return

        api = call["api"]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant