fix: verify OpenClaw and refresh cheap-tier pricing

README.md

@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ claude mcp add blockrun -s user -- npx -y @blockrun/mcp@latest
 |---|---|---|---|
 | **Claude Code** | ✅ Verified · 2.1.251 · 2026-08-30 | ✅ | `claude mcp add blockrun -s user -- npx -y @blockrun/mcp@latest` |
 | **Codex CLI** | ✅ Verified · 0.142.5 · 2026-08-30 | ❌ | `codex mcp add blockrun -- npx -y @blockrun/mcp@latest` |
-| **OpenClaw** | 🟡 In use · 2026.5.2 (from a local build; the `npx` form below is not yet verified) | — not documented | `openclaw mcp set blockrun '{"command":"npx","args":["-y","@blockrun/mcp@latest"]}'` |
+| **OpenClaw** | ✅ Verified · 2026.8.2 · 2026-09-02 | ⚠️ surface-dependent; see below | `openclaw mcp set blockrun '{"command":"npx","args":["-y","@blockrun/mcp@latest"]}'` |
 | **Claude Desktop** | 📝 Documented | ⚠️ renders; OK reports *cancel* → proceeds | `claude_desktop_config.json` — JSON below |
 | **Cursor** | 📝 Documented | ✅ | `~/.cursor/mcp.json` — JSON below |
 | **VS Code (Copilot)** | 📝 Documented | ✅ | `code --add-mcp '{"name":"blockrun","command":"npx","args":["-y","@blockrun/mcp@latest"]}'` |
@@ -141,6 +141,15 @@ claude mcp add blockrun -s user -- npx -y @blockrun/mcp@latest
 
 Any other MCP client that can spawn a stdio server works the same way: `command: npx`, `args: ["-y", "@blockrun/mcp@latest"]`. With nvm/Homebrew Node on a JSON-configured client, put the absolute path from `which npx` in `command`. Spend-dialog sources and what "proceeds without asking" means: [`docs/spend-confirmation.md`](docs/spend-confirmation.md).
 
+**OpenClaw:** the published `npx` package was verified end-to-end on 2026.8.2: all 20 tools were projected, free calls worked, and paid x402 calls settled. Add a hard session cap while installing:
+
+```bash
+openclaw mcp set blockrun '{"command":"npx","args":["-y","@blockrun/mcp@latest"],"env":{"BLOCKRUN_BUDGET_LIMIT":"2"}}'
+openclaw mcp doctor blockrun --probe
+```
+
+Spend confirmation depends on the OpenClaw runtime and chat surface. Its Codex harness supports MCP form elicitation, but an unmappable prompt is returned as an explicit decline; in the WebChat → Codex route tested here, `BLOCKRUN_CONFIRM_SPEND=on` declined paid calls without presenting an actionable dialog. Keep confirmation off on that route and rely on `BLOCKRUN_BUDGET_LIMIT` plus OpenClaw's own tool-approval mode.
+
 <details>
 <summary><strong>JSON for Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf</strong></summary>
 

docs/spend-confirmation.md

@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ client. Verified against each client's own documentation on 2026-08-29:
 | **Cursor** | ✅ Yes | Elicitation is listed as **Supported** in Cursor's MCP feature table. |
 | **VS Code (GitHub Copilot)** | ✅ Yes | Elicitation support landed in VS Code 1.102; URL-mode elicitation in 1.107. |
 | **Claude Desktop** | ⚠️ Partial | Observed while building this feature: a form dialog renders, but confirming it reports `cancel` rather than `accept`, so the call proceeds. Only an explicit **Decline** stops the charge. |
+| **OpenClaw** | ⚠️ Surface-dependent | Codex harness form elicitation is supported, but unmappable prompts are explicitly declined. On OpenClaw 2026.8.2 WebChat → Codex, this prompt returned `decline` without an actionable dialog, so paid calls stopped. Use the hard budget and OpenClaw tool approvals on that route. |
 | **Windsurf** | ❌ No | Windsurf documents support for tools, resources and prompts only. |
 | **Codex CLI** | ❌ Not documented | OpenAI's MCP docs list tool calling and server instructions; elicitation is not mentioned. |
 | **Gemini CLI** | ❌ Not documented | Tools, resources and prompts are documented; elicitation is not. |
@@ -123,6 +124,8 @@ Sources: [Claude Code MCP docs](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/mcp) ·
 [Cursor MCP docs](https://cursor.com/docs/context/mcp) ·
 [VS Code 1.102](https://code.visualstudio.com/updates/v1_102) /
 [1.107 release notes](https://code.visualstudio.com/updates/v1_107) ·
+[OpenClaw MCP docs](https://docs.openclaw.ai/cli/mcp) /
+[Codex harness runtime](https://docs.openclaw.ai/plugins/codex-harness-runtime) ·
 [Windsurf MCP docs](https://docs.windsurf.com/windsurf/cascade/mcp) ·
 [Codex MCP docs](https://developers.openai.com/codex/mcp) ·
 [Gemini CLI MCP docs](https://geminicli.com/docs/tools/mcp-server/).

src/utils/constants.ts

@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ export const BASE_RPC_URLS = [
 //   gemini-3.5-flash-lite ($0.3/$2.5, live-probed 2026-08-12),
 //   gemini-3.1-flash-lite ($0.25/$1.5), gemini-2.5-pro, gemini-2.5-flash,
 //   gemini-2.5-flash-lite — all 1M context
-// DeepSeek (3): deepseek-v4-pro ($0.435/$0.87, 1M, reasoning + coding),
+// DeepSeek (3): deepseek-v4-pro ($1.32/$3.96, 1M, reasoning + coding;
+//   repriced by the gateway and re-probed 2026-09-02),
 //   deepseek-chat, deepseek-reasoner ($0.14/$0.28 on Base since DeepSeek's
 //   2026-08-07 cut; sol still quotes $0.2/$0.4 — see the drift note above)
 // Moonshot (1): kimi-k3 ($3/$15, 1M, vision + reasoning + coding)
@@ -213,7 +214,7 @@ export const CHAT_PRICE_PER_MTOKEN: Record<string, { input: number; output: numb
   "zai/glm-5.1": { input: 1.4, output: 4.4 },
   "zai/glm-5-turbo": { input: 1.2, output: 4 },
   "zai/glm-5": { input: 1, output: 3.2 },
-  "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro": { input: 0.435, output: 0.87 },
+  "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro": { input: 1.32, output: 3.96 },
   "deepseek/deepseek-chat": { input: 0.14, output: 0.28 },
   "deepseek/deepseek-reasoner": { input: 0.14, output: 0.28 },
   "minimax/minimax-m3": { input: 0.3, output: 1.2 },
@@ -381,4 +382,3 @@ export const BASE_TOKENS: Record<string, string> = {
   DAI: "0x50c5725949A6F0c72E6C4a641F24049A917DB0Cb",
   cbETH: "0x2Ae3F1Ec7F1F5012CFEab0185bfc7aa3cf0DEc22",
 };
-

test/chat.test.ts

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ test("estimateChatCost keeps genuinely-free paths at $0", () => {
 // loop can fall through to any of them — so coding ($5/$25) legitimately
 // reserves less than balanced ($5/$30).
 //
-// Amounts below are live unpaid 402 quotes, 2026-08-13, 100k-char prompt,
+// Amounts below are live unpaid 402 quotes, last refreshed 2026-09-02, 100k-char prompt,
 // max_tokens 1024. Re-probe with `npm run verify:prices` (which now carries one
 // row per tier) rather than adjusting them to match a failing build.
 const LIVE_CHARGE_100K: Array<[string | undefined, string | undefined, number]> = [
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ const LIVE_CHARGE_100K: Array<[string | undefined, string | undefined, number]>
   [undefined, "openai/gpt-5.6-terra", 0.098269],
   [undefined, "google/gemini-3.5-flash", 0.073951],
   [undefined, "zai/glm-5", 0.049346],
-  [undefined, "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", 0.021977],
+  [undefined, "deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro", 0.064790],
   // Tier routing: the charge is that of the member the loop settles on, so each
   // tier is pinned against its most expensive member's live quote.
   ["powerful", undefined, 1.460020],   // gpt-5.4-pro
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ const LIVE_CHARGE_100K: Array<[string | undefined, string | undefined, number]>
   ["coding", undefined, 0.243655],     // claude-opus-5
   ["fast", undefined, 0.073951],       // gemini-3.5-flash
   ["glm", undefined, 0.049346],        // glm-5.x
-  ["cheap", undefined, 0.021977],      // deepseek-v4-pro
+  ["cheap", undefined, 0.064790],      // deepseek-v4-pro
 ];
 
-test("estimateChatCost never reserves less than the gateway charges (live 402, 2026-08-13)", () => {
+test("estimateChatCost never reserves less than the gateway charges (live 402, refreshed 2026-09-02)", () => {
   for (const [mode, model, charged] of LIVE_CHARGE_100K) {
     const reserved = estimateChatCost(1024, mode, model, undefined, 100_000);
     assert.ok(