Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
backend: add alerting for stuck async operations #5952
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backend: add alerting for stuck async operations #5952
Changes from all commits
ab53a97File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You pulled this straight from the test case, but I wonder if that test itself is wrong and conflating various kinds of "update", maybe it was from the before-times when we hadn't decided to fire-and-forget on OCP version upgrades? As I understand from a backend Operation perspective, the actual LRO should go basically from Accepted -> Succeeded/Failed immediately on an OCP upgrade, right? We should maybe consider a shorter timeout, so that when customers bump their autoscale max from 8 -> 9 and that gets locked it doesn't take 45m to fire (here, and in the test, honestly)
However... while investigating this - I did discover that there are some LROs that we could expect to go longer than 45m or even an hour - internal discussion here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, if/when we change the e2e, we can change this - and you're 100% right that there are possible updates that could take a long time. If and unless we update the metric to classify the 'type' of update LRO, we can't subdivide. Time will tell if it is meaningful or not.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.