Skip to content

[fix] Use non-detached Ray actor for SimpleStorageUnit#68

Merged
0oshowero0 merged 1 commit into
Ascend:mainfrom
0oshowero0:main
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

[fix] Use non-detached Ray actor for SimpleStorageUnit#68
0oshowero0 merged 1 commit into
Ascend:mainfrom
0oshowero0:main

Conversation

@0oshowero0

@0oshowero0 0oshowero0 commented Mar 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Follow PR #43 to use non-detached Ray actor for SimpleStorageUnit

Signed-off-by: 0oshowero0 <o0shower0o@outlook.com>
@ascend-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA Signature Pass

0oshowero0, thanks for your pull request. All authors of the commits have signed the CLA. 👍

@0oshowero0 0oshowero0 changed the title [chore] Use non-detached Ray actor for TransferQueueStorageUnit [chore] Use non-detached Ray actor for SimpleStorageUnit Mar 30, 2026
@0oshowero0 0oshowero0 marked this pull request as ready for review March 30, 2026 06:53
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 30, 2026 06:53

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the SimpleStorage backend initialization to create SimpleStorageUnit Ray actors with the default (non-detached) lifetime, aligning actor lifecycle with the initializing Ray job and reducing the chance of orphaned storage processes lingering in the cluster.

Changes:

  • Removed lifetime="detached" from SimpleStorageUnit.options(...) during SimpleStorage backend initialization.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@0oshowero0 0oshowero0 changed the title [chore] Use non-detached Ray actor for SimpleStorageUnit [fix] Use non-detached Ray actor for SimpleStorageUnit Mar 30, 2026
@0oshowero0 0oshowero0 merged commit 4e9ae22 into Ascend:main Mar 30, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants