⚡ Optimize LibraryRepository.updateReadingMode#41
Conversation
- Added `updateReadingModeByBaseTitle` to `LibraryDao` for direct SQL updates. - Refactored `LibraryRepository.updateReadingMode` to use the new DAO method instead of loading, filtering, and re-inserting all library items. - Verified optimization with a benchmark test (not committed) confirming `getAllItems` is no longer invoked during update. Co-authored-by: Aatricks <113598245+Aatricks@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What: Replaced the inefficient in-memory filtering and updating of library items in
updateReadingModewith a direct SQL update query inLibraryDao.🎯 Why: The previous implementation loaded the entire library into memory to update the reading mode for a group of chapters (grouped by
baseTitle). This caused unnecessary memory overhead and CPU usage, especially for large libraries.📊 Measured Improvement:
getAllItems), filtered the list in memory, and then executed a batch insert (insertItems).UPDATEstatement targeting only the relevant rows.getAllItemsis never called during the execution of the optimized method, proving the elimination of the O(N) memory load. All existing unit tests passed.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16969642914540689963 started by @Aatricks