Add agent definitions for agentic tasks#17
Conversation
- competition-tasks: generates tool-heavy, multi-step competition tasks - depth-test: minimal recursion test for agent spawning - tree-solver: recursive task decomposer with child delegation Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds new Claude agent definitions under .claude/agents/ intended to support agentic task generation and recursive delegation workflows in the Mobius project.
Changes:
- Introduces
competition-tasksagent for generating tool-dependent, verifiable competition tasks. - Introduces
depth-testagent to validate recursive agent spawning behavior. - Introduces
tree-solveragent for recursive task decomposition with child delegation.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| .claude/agents/competition-tasks.md | Adds an agent definition for generating multi-tier, tool-heavy competition tasks. |
| .claude/agents/depth-test.md | Adds an agent definition for a minimal recursion/spawn chain test. |
| .claude/agents/tree-solver.md | Adds an agent definition for recursive decomposition and delegated execution via child processes. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
- Strip raw `git show` output (commit metadata, diff headers, leading +) from competition-tasks.md, tree-solver.md, depth-test.md - Remove Write and Edit from --allowedTools in tree-solver.md spawn commands (consistent with "Do NOT use Write" instruction) - Fix competition-tasks.md output path from scripts/ to current working dir Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c97513aafb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…yntax Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
Three new .claude/agents/ definitions:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code