Skip to content

Added Maintainers.md - #371

Merged
imxade merged 2 commits into
AOSSIE-Org:mainfrom
PinJinx:temp
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

Added Maintainers.md#371
imxade merged 2 commits into
AOSSIE-Org:mainfrom
PinJinx:temp

Conversation

@PinJinx

@PinJinx PinJinx commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addressed Issues:

N/A

Fixes #(issue number)

Description

This PR adds a dedicated Maintainers, Mentors, and Ideators document to the repository.

The document includes:

  • The current project Maintainers along with their responsibilities.
  • The project Mentors and their areas of focus.
  • The Ideator responsible for the initial project proposal, with a link to the original idea discussion.
  • References to the official AOSSIE role definitions for Maintainers, Mentors, and Ideators to ensure consistency across repositories.

This improves repository documentation by clearly identifying the individuals responsible for maintaining, mentoring, and guiding the project.

Screenshots/Recordings:

N/A (Documentation-only change)

Functional Verification

Not applicable for this documentation change.

Additional Notes

This is a documentation-only PR and does not introduce any code or functional changes.

Checklist

  • My PR addresses a single issue, fixes a single bug or makes a single improvement.
  • My code follows the project's code style and conventions.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own changes.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • If applicable, I have made corresponding changes or additions to the documentation.
  • If applicable, I have made corresponding changes or additions to tests.
  • My changes generate no new warnings or errors.
  • I have joined the project's Discord server and I will share a link to this PR with the project maintainers there.
  • I have read the contributing guidelines.
  • Once I submit my PR, CodeRabbit AI will automatically review it and I will address CodeRabbit's comments.
  • In case of UI changes, I've added a demo video. (Not applicable)

⚠️ AI Notice - Important!

I confirm that I have reviewed the AI-assisted changes, verified their correctness, and ensured they meet the project's contribution standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added maintainer documentation, including project roles, responsibilities, focus areas, and proposal discussion details.

@PinJinx
PinJinx marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 16:02
@gitcordapp

gitcordapp Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Link your account with Gitcord

Thanks for opening this PR, @PinJinx!

To receive Discord notifications and contributor tracking for this organization:

  1. Join Discord: https://discord.gg/hjUhu33uAn
  2. In Discord, run /link PinJinx
  3. Paste the verification code into your GitHub bio (or a public gist)
  4. Click Verify in Discord (or run /verify-link PinJinx)

Once linked, Gitcord can notify you about reviews, merges, and more.

Posted by Gitcord

Removed Rohith K Pradeep from the maintainers list.
@imxade
imxade merged commit f56c260 into AOSSIE-Org:main Aug 5, 2026
4 checks passed
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@PinJinx, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 58 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8ed792c4-1562-49dc-b4d0-ae5bdfd7e2d8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e677e5d and b95f833.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • MAINTAINERS.md

Walkthrough

Added MAINTAINERS.md with documentation for ideators, mentors, and maintainers. The document lists roles, responsibilities, usernames, project details, and a discussion link.

Changes

Maintainer Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Maintainer role documentation
MAINTAINERS.md
Added role details for ideators, mentors, and maintainers. The document includes responsibilities, usernames, project information, and a discussion link.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Suggested labels: Documentation

Poem

A rabbit reads the maintainer guide,
With names and roles arranged inside.
Clear links help the work proceed,
The burrow has the notes it needs.
Hop, hop—documentation leads!

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants