Seed signer+smart card hat stuff from XMRStreet#330
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR's title references "Seed signer+smart card hat stuff from XMRStreet," but the actual change is the addition of a single empty placeholder directory (folder-name/) with a blank README.md file. There is no functional code, documentation, or meaningful content included.
Changes:
- Adds a new
folder-name/directory containing an emptyREADME.mdfile with no content.
folder-name/README.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR adds a new directory called folder-name/ containing only an empty README.md file. The directory name folder-name is a generic placeholder and does not convey any meaning about its purpose. Additionally, the file is completely empty (just a blank line), providing no documentation about what this directory is for or how it relates to the PR title's mention of "Seed signer+smart card hat stuff from XMRStreet." This appears to be an accidental or incomplete commit — no actual code, documentation, or meaningful content has been added.
…#347) * Initial plan * Add electronics/README.md with project descriptions and link to SeedSignerPlus display hat Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/3rdIteration/seedsigner/sessions/9f823fc2-6d1a-4a1f-8f24-9735c2d8fdbc Co-authored-by: 3rdIteration <2230318+3rdIteration@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: 3rdIteration <2230318+3rdIteration@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/3rdIteration/seedsigner/sessions/d6e6c89b-e871-4fe7-a10a-a4dbcacb72c2 Co-authored-by: 3rdIteration <2230318+3rdIteration@users.noreply.github.com>
Removed the |
Description
Removes the accidental placeholder
folder-name/directory containing an emptyREADME.mdfile that was committed without meaningful content. This cleans up the PR to reflect only the intended changes.This pull request is categorized as a:
Checklist
pytestand made sure all unit tests pass before sumbitting the PRIf you modified or added functionality/workflow, did you add new unit tests?
I have tested this PR on the following platforms/os:
Note: Keep your changes limited in scope; if you uncover other issues or improvements along the way, ideally submit those as a separate PR. The more complicated the PR the harder to review, test, and merge.