Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Port of e2638a5 onto origin/staging (cherry-pick applied cleanly). Ported: - crates/webclaw-fetch/Cargo.toml: wreq-util =3.0.0-rc.12 -> =3.0.0-rc.14 (exact pin kept; wreq stays at =6.0.0-rc.29) - Cargo.lock: matching wreq-util entry + checksum; no second wreq version - .gitignore: add .lasso/ Dropped: nothing. rc.14 only touches wreq-util's Chrome profiles (Accept q-value, new Chrome 149 profile, Emulation::weighted_random). webclaw-fetch consumes only Profile::SafariIos26 and the compressors, so our emitted fingerprints are unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drop the last lead/lead_batch mentions from examples/README.md and the @webclaw/mcp README tool count (14 -> 12), and bump create-webclaw to 0.1.8 since its setup text changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…candidate-20260909
Bump the workspace crates, the @webclaw/mcp launcher (package version and pinned release tag) and the MCP registry manifest to 0.6.23 together, and roll the Unreleased notes into a dated 0.6.23 section: extraction scope and unusable-page errors, recovery fixes, the retired Lead tools, faster JSON-LD parsing and the release pipeline checks. release-preflight.sh v0.6.23 passes. The README install commands and the Windows install workflow keep pointing at v0.6.22, the newest published release, until v0.6.23 is published. v0.6.22 stays on its existing commit.
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: trueThanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prepare v0.6.23 with consistent structured-output validation, source-aware summaries, strict main-content title recovery, and crawler callbacks shared by callers.
Local validation: 800 workspace tests passed; seven provider-environment tests passed separately in serial. Five ignored network/example cases remain for the release acceptance checklist. This draft collects automated checks and review on the staging candidate before promotion.