Implementations that use JSON-LD mechanisms to parse and then reserialize Activity Streams 2.0 documents that contain extension properties SHOULD take sufficient care to ensure that extension properties used within the original document are preserved and serialized appropriately.
We all should do all things appropriately; that's what "appropriate" means.
I think the requirement is that consumers that re-publish SHOULD include the original context in the republished object. Is that a better way to say it?
Do we want to name this kind of consumer? "A republisher"?
We all should do all things appropriately; that's what "appropriate" means.
I think the requirement is that consumers that re-publish SHOULD include the original context in the republished object. Is that a better way to say it?
Do we want to name this kind of consumer? "A republisher"?