Problem
Currently, Evidence Protector Pro detects anomalies within a single log file session, but there is no mechanism to prove that the analysis itself was not tampered with between sessions. In a legal context, this is a critical gap — a defense attorney could argue that the analyst modified findings after the fact, or that two sessions analyzing the same file produced different results without explanation.
Proposed Solution
Implement SHA-256 cryptographic hash chaining across analysis sessions, similar in concept to how blockchain links blocks. Each session would:
- Hash the input file — Compute a SHA-256 digest of the uploaded log file at ingestion time
- Hash the analysis output — Compute a digest of the findings (anomalies, timestamps, scores)
- Chain to the previous session — Include the previous session's hash in the current session's hash computation
- Store a session manifest — Save a lightweight JSON ledger locally (in the existing session persistence layer) recording the chain
Example Session Manifest Entry
{
"session_id": "a3f9...",
"timestamp": "2025-05-02T10:34:00Z",
"file_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44...",
"findings_hash": "sha256:d4a1f2...",
"previous_session_hash": "sha256:8c7b3e...",
"chain_hash": "sha256:91ac77..."
}
Why This Matters
- Legal admissibility — Proves the evidence and analysis are untouched from collection to court
- Analyst accountability — Any retroactive modification of findings breaks the chain visibly
- Zero external dependency — Entirely local, consistent with the project's privacy-first architecture
- Exportable proof — The chain manifest can be included in PDF/JSON exports as a verification artifact
Acceptance Criteria
Problem
Currently, Evidence Protector Pro detects anomalies within a single log file session, but there is no mechanism to prove that the analysis itself was not tampered with between sessions. In a legal context, this is a critical gap — a defense attorney could argue that the analyst modified findings after the fact, or that two sessions analyzing the same file produced different results without explanation.
Proposed Solution
Implement SHA-256 cryptographic hash chaining across analysis sessions, similar in concept to how blockchain links blocks. Each session would:
Example Session Manifest Entry
{ "session_id": "a3f9...", "timestamp": "2025-05-02T10:34:00Z", "file_hash": "sha256:e3b0c44...", "findings_hash": "sha256:d4a1f2...", "previous_session_hash": "sha256:8c7b3e...", "chain_hash": "sha256:91ac77..." }Why This Matters
Acceptance Criteria