As it seems, you don't currently support auto-completion for the fish shell. Fish is a well-established shell by now, I think (are there any statistics on shell usage?), so it'd make sense to add support.
I've just stumbled across this problem, but I really like your approach and would like to contribute a PR if there is any interest in supporting fish. As far as I've seen, both bash and zsh are implemented as string variables in the HookFactory currently.
Would it make sense to outsource this into a more generic Hooks\${ shellName }Factory approach?
As it seems, you don't currently support auto-completion for the
fishshell. Fish is a well-established shell by now, I think (are there any statistics on shell usage?), so it'd make sense to add support.I've just stumbled across this problem, but I really like your approach and would like to contribute a PR if there is any interest in supporting fish. As far as I've seen, both bash and zsh are implemented as string variables in the
HookFactorycurrently.Would it make sense to outsource this into a more generic
Hooks\${ shellName }Factoryapproach?