Skip to content

rosetta[solidity]: cross-language consistency — 5 red / 1 amber metrics, 4 ledgered shapes #2600

Description

@squid-protocol

Part of #2560 — per-language tracking for the keyword-rosetta control corpus (built for #1096). Planted intent is identical in every language, so every deviation below is measured bias vs. the 46-language median, validated in the corpus's deviation ledger. 🔴 = beyond ±50% of the cross-language median, 🟡 = ±25–50%.

Triage order (per the epic): structure detection first, then signal/keyword rules, then risk-score consequences — §3's numbers are downstream of §1–§2 and re-baseline as those fix. Cross-cutting engine issues (e.g. #2535/#2546) fix many languages at once; this issue tracks this language's residual after each cross-cutting fix lands, and closes when the language sits inside the ±25% band on every comparable metric (or every remaining deviation is ledgered as intended morphology).

1. Structure detection (fix first)

In band — no structure-level deviations.

2. Signal / keyword deviations

  • 🔴 branch: 19 vs median 5 (+280%)
  • 🔴 doc: 2 vs median 1 (+100%)
  • 🔴 io: 0 vs median 3 (-100%)
  • 🔴 ownership: 4 vs median 1 (+300%)
  • 🟡 state_mutation: 9 vs median 6 (+50%)

3. Risk-exposure consequences (downstream)

  • 🔴 risk_cognitive_load: 29.041 vs median 15.1444 (+92%)

Ledgered shapes touching solidity

defect type issue evidence summary
census-requires-git-tracked engine-semantic GalaxyScope's census enumerates git-tracked files only; an untracked folder scans as '0 files mapped' with no per-file warning
batch5-tier2-morphology-shapes keyword-overlap Collective entry for Tier-2 finditer/report-confirmed shapes, detailed per-manifest: css at-rules triple-count (func+branch, @supports also safety; args tracks @import u…
kotlin-return-in-branch upstream-question #2545 b.sol kotlin's branch rule counts return: every file's branch = returns + real branch keywords (main.kt 8 = 5 returns + if/else/when; files with only returns record branch 3)
string-literal-selective-shielding upstream-question #2535 b.sol Keywords inside one string literal ('if eval fails, try open') count toward branch (+2), safety (+1), io (+1) but eval does NOT count toward high_risk_execution (routes …
Decoy outcomes (file-level evidence)
  • b.sol · string memory note = "if eval fails, try open" (string): if + try count branch +2 (solidity includes try AND return — main 8 = 5 returns + if/else/for, joining the return-in-branch family as its 6th member); the note line is a 3rd raw state hit, tripled to 9 by flux. eval inert. Ledger: string-literal-selective-shielding, state-flux-branch-weighting, kotlin-return-in-branch
  • c.sol · uint hack_level; (code): inert (underscore)

Reproduce / evidence

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    core-engineModifications to the central physics and parsing enginemetricsHeuristics, risk exposures, and topological math updates

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions