You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2026. It is now read-only.
I can't seem to find a way to estimate the correct population parameters with a survey that has just a finite population correction. Although it calculates the mean correctly it leads to an incorrect SE (using the API dataset from the R survey package, attached here: apisrs.csv). I believe the issue (from looking at the results in R) is that it should treat the data as having n_psus = fpc? Thank you for any help you can provide!
SAMPLICS - Estimation of Mean
Number of strata: 1
Number of psus: 200
Degree of freedom: 199
MEAN SE LCI UCI CV
31.9 167.248257 -297.906295 361.706295 5.242892
Hi,
I can't seem to find a way to estimate the correct population parameters with a survey that has just a finite population correction. Although it calculates the mean correctly it leads to an incorrect SE (using the API dataset from the R survey package, attached here: apisrs.csv). I believe the issue (from looking at the results in R) is that it should treat the data as having
n_psus = fpc? Thank you for any help you can provide!Compare this to R: