Skip to content

Suggestion: Consider archiving or redirecting to tenacity #101

Description

@Selliksss

🤖 This issue was opened by repo-revival-agent, an experimental tool that analyzes inactive repositories and suggests next steps. A human reviewed this suggestion before opening. Feel free to close if not useful.

Why this issue

  • Last commit was ~10 years ago (3610 days), and the repository shows no recent maintenance activity
  • tenacity is a direct successor with 8564 stars, modern Python 3 support, and explicitly documents itself as the improved version of this library

Suggested actions

You might consider:

  • Updating the README to point to tenacity as the actively maintained alternative, making it easier for users to find the current solution
  • Archiving the repository to signal that it's no longer maintained

This is a suggestion based on automated analysis. The maintainer knows their project's context better than the agent. Closing without action is a perfectly valid response.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions