Skip to content

Add support for rp235_arm_ns binaries #1839

Description

@kilograham
  • These are non-secure binaries that are launched by a secure counterpart
  • These are independent SDK binaries linked in their own right
  • They should be linked to run at 0x10400000 or 0x10800000 or 0x10c00000
  • There needs to be support for launching the NS binary from S code
  • The NS binary must only initialize h/w it owns
  • The secure side of the SDK must provide helper functions such as "launch NS code on core 1"
  • The secure side of the SDK should provide other secure helper functionality required to implement any pertinent SDK features on the NS side, and provide them via the bootrom secure_call mechanism

A good test case would be running Micropython under some secure firmware

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Fields

No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions