Thanks for improving html-explainer.
The project should stay small and useful. Every change should strengthen this path:
intent -> evidence -> visual understanding -> decision -> next action -> reusable memory
- Better pattern failure modes.
- Better examples.
- Clearer command behavior.
- Stronger validation scripts.
- Clearer user value and language-matching behavior.
- Safer install/uninstall behavior.
- Simpler docs that remove confusion.
- Small skill folders with
SKILL.mdand only the assets, references, orDESIGN.mdthey actually need.
Run:
bash -n install.sh uninstall.sh scripts/*.sh
scripts/validate-patterns.sh
scripts/validate-commands.sh
scripts/validate-examples.sh
scripts/validate-goals.sh
scripts/validate-golden-artifacts.sh
scripts/validate-scenarios.sh
scripts/smoke-install.sh
scripts/smoke-uninstall.sh
scripts/smoke-artifact-memory.sh
DRY_RUN=1 INSTALL_UPSTREAM=0 FETCH_EXAMPLES=0 bash install.shThese checks confirm required behavior. New artifacts and patterns should include the required user-facing parts before validation runs.
For substantial PRs, /goal is the recommended closeout mode:
/goal this PR is ready when bash -n install.sh uninstall.sh scripts/*.sh passes, validate-patterns, validate-commands, validate-examples, validate-goals, validate-golden-artifacts, validate-scenarios, smoke-install, smoke-uninstall, and smoke-artifact-memory all pass, README/CI/CONTRIBUTING stay aligned, and git status shows no generated junk.
Use /goal only when the work has a verifiable finish line. Do not use it to justify new commands, hooks, services, or long-running machinery.
Before adding a new validator, ask whether the check is deterministic. If it needs judgment over usefulness, clarity, user value, or the conversation as a whole, prefer a goal contract in goals/. If it can run cheaply in CI without Claude, keep it as a script.
When adding or changing a command, keep it operational and short. Put the completion standard in the matching goals/*.goal.md file instead of repeating a checklist inside commands/*.md.
When adding a new principle or product promise, update docs/ENGINEERING_TRANSLATION.md with the concrete behavior, affected files, and confirmation check. If the promise affects generated HTML, add or update runtime validation.
Each pattern must include:
- intent;
- use case;
- evidence required;
- prompt template;
- HTML structure;
- quality checklist;
- failure modes;
- tie-breakers;
- acceptance criteria;
- visual explainer contract.
If the pattern represents a common workflow, add or update an example in examples/.
Examples must include:
- primary intent;
- secondary intent coverage;
- base concept;
- HTML advantage;
- artifact budget;
- mental work removed;
- evidence;
- risk or uncertainty;
- next prompt or exportable output;
- archive recommendation when the artifact may be reused;
- quiet memory access receipt;
- invisible quality gate pass;
- user-language output unless a different audience is requested;
- system light/dark support.
Interactive examples must include copy/export output.
- Adding a new doc when an existing one can be improved.
- Adding a new command for a narrow case.
- Decorative HTML that does not improve a decision.
- Claims without evidence.
- Expanding the process without removing friction somewhere else.