diff --git a/components/mastermap/mastermap-data.ts b/components/mastermap/mastermap-data.ts index 5d4c2efe..9308b4ec 100644 --- a/components/mastermap/mastermap-data.ts +++ b/components/mastermap/mastermap-data.ts @@ -581,59 +581,133 @@ export const PROJECTS: ProjectData[] = [ category: "private-writes", status: "Active", statusVariant: "active", - completion: 10, + completion: 40, description: "Institutional Privacy Task Force. PoCs, architecture reviews, workshops, market map.", href: "/mastermap/iptf", tags: ["Institutional", "PoCs", "Workshops", "Market Map"], now: [ { - name: "PoCs (2-3)", + name: "PoCs (7 shipped)", description: - "3 weeks dev time per PoC. Usable demo slices. Validate institutional demand for privacy.", - status: "Planned", - statusDot: "yellow", + "Private Bonds (3 approaches: UTXO+ZK, Aztec L2, FHE), Private Transfers (shielded pool), Plasma Stablecoins, DIY Validium (RISC Zero), TEE Cross-Chain Atomic Swap. Each with blog write-up and open-source code.", + status: "Done", + statusDot: "green", }, { - name: "Architecture Reviews", + name: "Privacy Market Map v0.3.0", description: - "Phased technical review of confidentiality architectures across blockchain ecosystems.", - status: "Planned", - statusDot: "yellow", + "Open-source knowledge base: 58 patterns, 12 approaches, 25 vendors, 22 use cases. CROPS evaluation framework, CI validation, external contributions.", + status: "Done · Ongoing", + statusDot: "green", }, { - name: "Workshops (2-3)", + name: "Blog Series (10 posts)", description: - "Targeted engagement with institutional stakeholders. Capture constraints and build trust.", - status: "Planned", - statusDot: "yellow", + "Published on iptf.ethereum.org: Private Bonds (3 parts), Public Rails vs Private Ledgers, Private Transfers, Plasma Stablecoins, DIY Validium, TEE Atomic Swap (2 parts), Cypherpunk & Institutional Privacy.", + status: "Done", + statusDot: "green", + }, + { + name: "Workshops & Engagement", + description: + "3 workshops delivered. Reached 14 financial institutions, 17 tech companies, 9 government orgs. 33% conversion rate on institutional outreach.", + status: "Done · Ongoing", + statusDot: "green", + }, + { + name: "Survive Track (3 PoCs)", + description: + "Adversarial resilience sprint testing I2U protections: escape hatches, force withdrawal, rugpull protection. Feeds directly into CROPS I2U scoring.", + status: "In progress", + statusDot: "green", }, ], next: [ { - name: "Privacy Market Map Updates", + name: "Guide v0 (Web Product)", description: - "Keep the market map growing. Maintain contribution momentum.", - status: "Ongoing", - statusDot: "green", + "Persona-routed web app on iptf.ethereum.org. Pattern cards with CROPS visuals. Approach pages as case studies. Entry points for Legal, Risk, Business, and Technical personas.", + status: "Mid-May 2026 · Critical", + statusDot: "yellow", }, { - name: "Reports & Specifications", + name: "PoCs (3-4 new)", description: - "Explainer documents building toward \"State of Institutional Privacy\" marquee report.", - status: "Planned", + "Mix of institutional and resilience PoCs. Candidates: encrypted mempool, PIR in shielded pool, private money market fund, private derivatives, PQ shielded pool.", + status: "Q2 2026", + statusDot: "yellow", + }, + { + name: "End-User Privacy Protections", + description: + "Map patterns that cover end-user privacy against institutions: escape hatches, force withdrawal, rugpull protection, viewing-key limits.", + status: "Q2 2026", + statusDot: "yellow", + }, + { + name: "Workshops & Institutional Engagement", + description: + "2+ workshops lined up, plus deeper second-tier engagements. Broadening reach to governments, NGOs, and central banks alongside financial institutions. Push for public collaboration announcements. Expand communications beyond crypto Twitter to LinkedIn and business journals.", + status: "Q2 2026", statusDot: "yellow", }, ], later: [ + { + name: "Specifications Repository", + description: + "Formal specification lifecycle for institutional privacy primitives. Scope decision pending: institutional specs vs broader access layer specs.", + status: "H2 2026", + statusDot: "gray", + }, { name: "State of Institutional Privacy", description: - "Marquee report with benchmarks, comparisons, and institutional landscape analysis.", + "~50-page marquee report: use cases, approaches, PoC summaries, benchmarks. Physical copies for Devcon.", status: "H2 2026", statusDot: "gray", }, ], + details: { + description: [ + "Help institutions and enterprises adopt Ethereum with robust privacy protections", + "Turn the privacy market map into a product: guide, one-pagers, reports as projections of a single source of truth", + "Expand coverage to protect end users against institutional adversaries", + ], + deliverables: [ + "7 PoCs shipped in Q1 with 10 blog posts and open-source code", + "Guide v0 on iptf.ethereum.org with persona-routed entry points", + "End-user protection patterns and resilience PoCs", + ], + impact: [ + "Institutions have concrete, open-source references for building privacy on Ethereum", + "Ecosystem has a credibly neutral, verified map of privacy solutions and trade-offs", + "End-user protections proven in code alongside institutional privacy", + ], + }, + kpis: [ + { + label: "PoCs shipped", + target: "7 in Q1, ~5 in Q2", + status: "Q1 done · Q2 in progress", + }, + { + label: "Map coverage", + target: "58 patterns, 25 vendors", + status: "Ongoing", + }, + { + label: "Institutional engagement", + target: "Governments, NGOs, FIs", + status: "Expanding", + }, + { + label: "Workshops per quarter", + target: "2-3", + status: "On track", + }, + ], }, // ─── Private Reads ───