Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
|
For evaluating projects, I suggest considering the following dimensions and their corresponding weights:
These metrics collectively provide insights into a project's popularity, adoption rate, development activity, community engagement, and maintenance status. |
1 reply
|
Great suggestions @lukema95 馃檶 We could also consider adding a focus on the quality of contributions. For example, rewarding helpful code reviews, merged pull requests, and extra weight for solving high-priority issues would highlight impact of action and meaningful contributions 馃憤 |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We are designing buidler board for bewater.xyz !
Should we use the number of stars猸愶笍 as a criterion for sorting developers and repositories? Or......
You have a better idea馃挕馃ぉ?
馃張馃張馃張 Show me ur cooooool idea in this post, get involved in the BeWater project! 馃張馃張馃張
All reactions