Incorrect ATS subjects?

[fmigneault]

In the ATS, the subject field refers in many places to the "/conf/..." reference, e.g.:

ogcapi-processes/core/abstract_tests/ATS_class_dismiss.adoc

Lines 1 to 7 in 8e96af4

	[[ats_dismiss]]
	[conformance_class]
	.Dismiss
	====
	[%metadata]
	identifier:: https://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-processes-1/2.0/conf/dismiss
	subject:: <<rc_core,https://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-processes-1/2.0/conf/dismiss>>

If I understand the references properly, shouldn't they instead refer to the "/req/...", such that they match the identifier of the corresponding Requirement Class ?

ogcapi-processes/core/requirements/requirements_class_dismiss.adoc

Lines 1 to 6 in 8e96af4

	[[rc_dismiss]]
	[requirements_class]
	.Requirements Class 'Dismiss'
	====
	[%metadata]
	identifier:: https://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-processes-1/2.0/req/dismiss

There also seems to be an issue with this subject field, since they are all rendered "empty" in https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/18-062r3.html (even when the subject is just a plain text, not a ref, like Web API).

[fmigneault]

@pvretano FYI

[pvretano]

@fmigneault yes, I am aware of these problems. My practice is to update the ATS last after all other RFC comments have been dealt with so I will fix then. We can leave this issue open till then as a reminder.