You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Tired of repeating yourself when using the TM1Service resource, @onefloid?
I think I remember a conversation we had about this issue...
As Raymond Hettinger uses to shout: "There must be a better way!"
So I just remembered decorators and asked Mr Copilot!
Here's what I got:
Question: How can I use a decorator for avoiding repeated with statements for using resources?
Answer: You can create a decorator that handles the opening and closing of resources, such as files, to avoid repeated with statements. Here's an example of how you can modify your code to use such a decorator:
In this example, the resource_manager decorator takes a resource_path argument and opens the resource (in this case, a file) within the wrapper function. The reader function now takes the opened resource as an argument, allowing you to avoid repeating the with statement.
Caution
However, my dear @onefloid, using this naive approach, you won't like it. Now, reader doesn't really know it's input data or types in your code editor anymore. But there's the functools-library coming to your rescue! And so let's ask Copilot again:
Question: How can I improve this approach using functools?
Answer: You can use functools.wraps to preserve the metadata of the original function when creating decorators. Here's how you can improve your approach using functools:
In this improved version, the resource_manager decorator uses functools.wraps to wrap the func function. This ensures that the metadata of the original function (such as its name and docstring) is preserved. The reader function now takes the opened resource as an argument, allowing you to avoid repeating the with statement.
Hope, this was what you were looking for... At least I think this would be pretty neat.
Tired of repeating yourself when using the
TM1Serviceresource, @onefloid?I think I remember a conversation we had about this issue...
As Raymond Hettinger uses to shout: "There must be a better way!"
So I just remembered decorators and asked Mr Copilot!
Here's what I got:
Question:
How can I use a decorator for avoiding repeated with statements for using resources?
Answer:
You can create a decorator that handles the opening and closing of resources, such as files, to avoid repeated
withstatements. Here's an example of how you can modify your code to use such a decorator:In this example, the resource_manager decorator takes a resource_path argument and opens the resource (in this case, a file) within the
wrapperfunction. Thereaderfunction now takes the opened resource as an argument, allowing you to avoid repeating the with statement.Caution
However, my dear @onefloid, using this naive approach, you won't like it. Now,
readerdoesn't really know it's input data or types in your code editor anymore. But there's thefunctools-library coming to your rescue! And so let's ask Copilot again:Question:
How can I improve this approach using
functools?Answer:
You can use
functools.wrapsto preserve the metadata of the original function when creating decorators. Here's how you can improve your approach usingfunctools:In this improved version, the resource_manager decorator uses functools.wraps to wrap the
funcfunction. This ensures that the metadata of the original function (such as its name and docstring) is preserved. Thereaderfunction now takes the opened resource as an argument, allowing you to avoid repeating the with statement.Hope, this was what you were looking for... At least I think this would be pretty neat.