Measured while implementing #4616 (the gallery registration widening). Filed unassigned; not fixed there — that PR registers plugin packages, and this entry's red tile is an authoring defect in the entry, not a missing registration. Duplicate-searched (keyword + the toggle-group / single type names): no open issue covers it.
The defect
examples/schema-catalog/src/schemas/components-disclosure-toggle-group/with-labels.json opens with:
{
"type": "single",
"items": [
{ "value": "list", "icon": "list", "label": "List" },
...
]
}
No package in the workspace registers a single component type, so /docs/guide/schema-catalog paints the registry's red panel for this tile:
Unknown component type: single (OBJUI-001)
Its two siblings in the same category spell the same idea correctly — the selection mode is a property, not the type:
single-selection.json — "type": "toggle-group", "selectionType": "single"
multiple-selection.json — "type": "toggle-group", "selectionType": "multiple"
So the value that belongs in selectionType ended up in type.
Measured
Rendering all 423 catalog entries the way SchemaThumbnail renders them, against the full registration set #4616 lands, exactly two entries still show OBJUI-001: this one, and core-schema-renderer/unknown-component-type (which demonstrates the panel on purpose). This is the only unintentional one.
Why it was left out of #4616
That card's ruling scopes it to registration and says entry-shape defects are censused and filed rather than rewritten. This entry is named as an explicit exclusion, with this issue number, in examples/schema-catalog/test/catalog-gallery-render.test.tsx — so the pin stays honest about what it does not cover, and removing the exclusion is the natural last step of fixing this.
Fix shape (not prescriptive)
The one-key correction is "type": "toggle-group" plus "selectionType": "single", matching the siblings. Worth confirming first that with-labels is meant to demo the icon+label variant of a single-select toggle group rather than something else, since its items carry icon where the siblings' do not.
Refs #4616, PR #4615.
Measured while implementing #4616 (the gallery registration widening). Filed unassigned; not fixed there — that PR registers plugin packages, and this entry's red tile is an authoring defect in the entry, not a missing registration. Duplicate-searched (keyword + the
toggle-group/singletype names): no open issue covers it.The defect
examples/schema-catalog/src/schemas/components-disclosure-toggle-group/with-labels.jsonopens with:{ "type": "single", "items": [ { "value": "list", "icon": "list", "label": "List" }, ... ] }No package in the workspace registers a
singlecomponent type, so/docs/guide/schema-catalogpaints the registry's red panel for this tile:Its two siblings in the same category spell the same idea correctly — the selection mode is a property, not the type:
single-selection.json—"type": "toggle-group", "selectionType": "single"multiple-selection.json—"type": "toggle-group", "selectionType": "multiple"So the value that belongs in
selectionTypeended up intype.Measured
Rendering all 423 catalog entries the way
SchemaThumbnailrenders them, against the full registration set #4616 lands, exactly two entries still show OBJUI-001: this one, andcore-schema-renderer/unknown-component-type(which demonstrates the panel on purpose). This is the only unintentional one.Why it was left out of #4616
That card's ruling scopes it to registration and says entry-shape defects are censused and filed rather than rewritten. This entry is named as an explicit exclusion, with this issue number, in
examples/schema-catalog/test/catalog-gallery-render.test.tsx— so the pin stays honest about what it does not cover, and removing the exclusion is the natural last step of fixing this.Fix shape (not prescriptive)
The one-key correction is
"type": "toggle-group"plus"selectionType": "single", matching the siblings. Worth confirming first thatwith-labelsis meant to demo the icon+label variant of a single-select toggle group rather than something else, since itsitemscarryiconwhere the siblings' do not.Refs #4616, PR #4615.