You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/QUALITY_SNAPSHOTS.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The macOS server-startup P95 budget recalibration is tracked by issue #507 and f
28
28
29
29
The warm refresh and warm time-to-first P95 budgets were recalibrated in issue #511 after PR #510 separated cold and warm samples. Three unchanged-code PR runs plus the exact schema-v2 baseline at `ad7ca14` retain at least 2.5 times the observed absolute run-to-run range.
30
30
31
-
The Windows warm full-refresh P50 budget was recalibrated in issue #513 from repeated unchanged-code pull-request measurements plus the exact schema-v2 baseline at `ad7ca14`. It retains nearly twice the observed absolute range while blocking a sustained median above 255ms against that baseline.
31
+
The Windows warm full-refresh P50 budget was recalibrated in issue #513 from five unchanged-code pull-request measurements plus the exact schema-v2 baseline at `ad7ca14` (six measurements total). It retains nearly twice the observed absolute range while blocking a sustained median above 255ms against that baseline.
32
32
33
33
Schema v2 records `full_refresh` and `time_to_first_env` from the warm member of each pair and adds cold refresh/time-to-first distributions. During its one-time rollout, comparisons against a schema-v1 base checked cold P50 against explicit absolute ceilings of 500ms on Linux, 750ms on Windows, and 1,000ms on macOS. Schema-v2-to-v2 comparisons use the table's dual budgets.
0 commit comments