You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Working notes for Chapter 6: Results of the master thesis "Benchmarking Cloud-Native and Traditional Geospatial Technologies."
This chapter is currently a placeholder. Content will present benchmark outcomes.
Expected content
RQ1 results: wall-clock time, network transfer, and cost comparisons across DuckDB+GeoParquet, PostGIS, and Shapefile for spatial intersection, kNN, and bounding-box queries at small and large dataset tiers
RQ2 results: Sedona broadcast-join and partitioned-join vs. PostGIS and DuckDB on national-scale spatial joins across small, medium, and large tiers
RQ3 results: consistency of best-performing stack across query patterns and outcome dimensions
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Purpose
Working notes for Chapter 6: Results of the master thesis
"Benchmarking Cloud-Native and Traditional Geospatial Technologies."
This chapter is currently a placeholder. Content will present benchmark outcomes.
Expected content
How to use this thread
Post notes, draft paragraphs, open questions, and revision requests as comments.
All reactions