You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Working notes for Chapter 1: Introduction of the master thesis "Benchmarking Cloud-Native and Traditional Geospatial Technologies."
Sections covered
1.1 Motivation
1.2 Project description (RQ1, RQ2, RQ3)
1.3 Contributions
1.4 Scope and limitations
Key topics to document
Motivation: why compare cloud-native (GeoParquet + DuckDB) against traditional (PostGIS, Shapefile) stacks
Three research questions: RQ1 (cloud-native vs. traditional), RQ2 (distributed Sedona vs. single-node scaling), RQ3 (consistency of winners across query patterns)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Purpose
Working notes for Chapter 1: Introduction of the master thesis
"Benchmarking Cloud-Native and Traditional Geospatial Technologies."
Sections covered
Key topics to document
How to use this thread
Post notes, draft paragraphs, open questions, and revision requests as comments.
All reactions