hi @julenbadiola,
I was browsing the "guide" details page:
From user point of view we think that having a collapsed/exploded trees without any explanation of what the nodes rapresent could be difficult to understand the meaning. Maybe it could be cleared to have standard co-process tree and the other customized (Hackathon creation process in that example) with a brief description or something that explains the differences. Of course the first layer rapresentation is ok but if the user see that page for the first time He/She can't understand the meaning of the nodes. He just see that one tree schema is shorter than the other. What do you think?
hi @julenbadiola,
I was browsing the "guide" details page:
From user point of view we think that having a collapsed/exploded trees without any explanation of what the nodes rapresent could be difficult to understand the meaning. Maybe it could be cleared to have standard co-process tree and the other customized (Hackathon creation process in that example) with a brief description or something that explains the differences. Of course the first layer rapresentation is ok but if the user see that page for the first time He/She can't understand the meaning of the nodes. He just see that one tree schema is shorter than the other. What do you think?