Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2020. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2020. It is now read-only.

Router-to-router mode in performance test is very bad #96

Description

@csibbitt

When testing in "router-to-router mode" the SAF QDR fails to receive a large number of the metrics generated by telemetry-bench. In "direct mode" this is not observed.

r-to-r: telemetry-bench -> client QDR -> SAF QDR -> Smart Gateway
direct: telemetry-bench -> SAF QDR -> Smart Gateway

Here is a comparison of r-to-r vs. direct mode.

  • The command used is always ./performance-test.sh -t tb -c 30 -h 10 -p 1000 -i 10 -n 10
  • We are looking specifically at the "Received by QDR" stat. It should read exactly 3000010 in all cases.

Direct Mode (presettled)

image

r-to-r mode (presettled)

image

It was suggested that requiring acknowledgements ("unsettled delivery") might improve the situation. While this does increase the reliability considerably (at the cost of throughput and CPU utilization, though nothing major at this scale), some messages ARE still lost ("Received by QDR" < 3000010):

Direct Mode (unsettled)

image

r-to-r mode (unsettled)

image

Our best guess is that these need tuning, but currently the operator does not seem to expose them:

  • maxSessionFrames (integer): Session incoming window measured in transfer frames for sessions created on this connection.
  • linkCapacity (integer): The capacity of links within this connection, in terms of message deliveries.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions