🏥 Safe Output Health Report - February 8, 2026 #14483
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-15T08:09:20.500Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Audit Period: Last 24 hours (February 7-8, 2026)
Overall Health Status: ✅ Excellent
The safe output system is operating at 100% success rate. All 45 safe_outputs jobs completed successfully with only 4 minor warnings related to permissions. The system's fallback mechanisms are working correctly.
Safe Output Job Statistics
All safe_outputs jobs completed successfully. The jobs processed various safe output tool calls including
noop,missing_tool,create_discussion,create_issue,create_pull_request, and others.Safe Output Tool Usage (Last 24 Hours):
Top Active Workflows with Safe Outputs:
Warning Clusters
Cluster 1: Discussion Permission Errors (Low Priority)
Count: 3 occurrences
Type: API Permissions
Error Pattern:
Discussion creation failed due to permissions: Resource not accessible by integrationAffected Workflows:
Root Cause: The GITHUB_TOKEN used by these workflows lacks
discussions: writepermission. When agents attempt to create discussions, the API returns a permission error.Mitigation: System automatically falls back to creating issues instead of discussions. All 3 workflows successfully created issues after the permission error.
Impact:⚠️ Low - The fallback mechanism works correctly, ensuring no data loss. Users still receive reports via issues instead of discussions.
View Sample Log Output
Root Cause Analysis
API Permission Issues
Discussion Creation Permissions: Three workflows attempted to create discussions but lacked the necessary
discussions: writepermission. The safe output system correctly handled this by falling back to issue creation, demonstrating robust error handling.Why This Occurs: GitHub Actions workflows with default
GITHUB_TOKENpermissions do not include discussions access unless explicitly granted in the workflow configuration.Repository Configuration Issues
Auto-Merge Configuration: One workflow attempted to enable auto-merge on a PR but encountered repository-level restrictions. This is expected behavior when repository settings restrict certain merge methods.
Why This Occurs: Repository administrators may disable merge commits to enforce a specific merge strategy (e.g., squash or rebase only).
Recommendations
1. Discussion Permissions (Low Priority)
Type: Configuration
Affected Workflows: 3
Effort: Small
Problem: Workflows attempting to create discussions receive permission errors.
Solution: Add
discussions: writepermission to workflows that need to create discussions:Affected Workflow Files:
.github/workflows/daily-team-evolution-insights.lock.yml.github/workflows/daily-regulatory.lock.yml.github/workflows/docs-noob-tester.lock.ymlAlternative: Accept the current behavior where discussions fall back to issues. The fallback works correctly and may be preferable for certain workflows.
Recommendation: Skip this fix - The fallback mechanism is working perfectly and provides equivalent functionality. No action needed unless discussions are specifically preferred over issues.
2. Auto-Merge Configuration (Low Priority)
Type: Documentation / Configuration Review
Affected Workflows: 1
Effort: Small
Problem: Auto-merge fails due to repository merge method restrictions.
Solution Options:
Accept Current Behavior (Recommended): Auto-merge is optional. PRs can be merged manually.
Update Repository Settings: If auto-merge is desired, enable merge commits in repository settings:
Update Workflow to Use Allowed Merge Method: Configure the workflow to use the allowed merge method (squash or rebase).
Recommendation: No action needed - Auto-merge is a convenience feature. Manual merging is acceptable and provides additional human review opportunities.
Metrics and KPIs
noop(26 calls) - indicating many workflows complete analysis without requiring changesHealth Trend Analysis
First Audit Period: This is the inaugural safe output health audit. No historical comparison data is available yet.
Current Status: The safe output system is operating excellently with:
Recommendation for Future Audits: Continue daily monitoring to establish baseline metrics and identify any emerging patterns.
Conclusion
The safe output system is in excellent health. All jobs completed successfully, and the system gracefully handled the only issues encountered (permission errors) through well-designed fallback mechanisms.
The 4 warnings identified are low priority and do not require immediate action. The system is working as designed, with fallback mechanisms ensuring that no data is lost and all outputs are delivered to users.
Key Strengths Observed:
Next Steps:
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions