Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2026. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2026. It is now read-only.

Add a research-backed acceptance harness for template go service (template new microservices service-runtime proto) #7

Description

@haasonsaas

Summary

Convert the repo's latent product contract into a repeatable benchmark suite with explicit pass/fail evidence.

This issue was generated from an org-wide EvalOps mining pass on 2026-05-10 07:57 UTC. It combines live GitHub repo signals with a per-repo arXiv search. Treat the research links as grounding for a concrete implementation, not as a request for a literature review.

Repo Evidence

  • Repository description: Template for new EvalOps Go microservices — service-runtime, proto, CI, GHCR publishing, CODEOWNERS
  • Tree signals: 0 docs files, 2 workflows, 0 proto files, 0 test-like files.
  • Anchor files sampled: README.md, go.mod

Research Grounding

Repo axes: infra, governance, security, evaluation

Search keywords: github, indirect, com, run, uses, actions, build, service-runtime, make, name, template, test

  • arXiv:2604.04749v1 AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments (Eranga Bandara, Asanga Gunaratna, Ross Gore, Abdul Rahman, Ravi Mukkamala, Sachin Shetty), 2026.
  • arXiv:2604.26152v1 AI Observability for Large Language Model Systems: A Multi-Layer Analysis of Monitoring Approaches from Confidence Calibration to Infrastructure Tracing (Twinkll Sisodia), 2026.
  • arXiv:2604.17092v1 AI Observability for Developer Productivity Tools: Bridging Cost Awareness and Code Quality (Happy Bhati, Twinkll Sisodia), 2026.
  • arXiv:2604.03262v1 AI Governance Control Stack for Operational Stability: Achieving Hardened Governance in AI Systems (Horatio Morgan), 2026.
  • arXiv:2001.07935v2 CodeReef: an open platform for portable MLOps, reusable automation actions and reproducible benchmarking (Grigori Fursin, Herve Guillou, Nicolas Essayan), 2020.
  • arXiv:2502.15859v4 AI Governance InternationaL Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2024 (Yi Zeng, Enmeng Lu, Xin Guan, Cunqing Huangfu, Zizhe Ruan, Ammar Younas), 2025.
  • arXiv:2510.11595v1 Reproducibility: The New Frontier in AI Governance (Israel Mason-Williams, Gabryel Mason-Williams), 2025.
  • arXiv:2302.01061v1 MLOps with enhanced performance control and observability (Indradumna Banerjee, Dinesh Ghanta, Girish Nautiyal, Pradeep Sanchana, Prateek Katageri, Atin Modi), 2023.
  • arXiv:2305.14865v1 A Game-Theoretic Framework for AI Governance (Na Zhang, Kun Yue, Chao Fang), 2023.
  • arXiv:2603.26865v1 A federated architecture for sector-led AI governance: lessons from India (Avinash Agarwal, Manisha J. Nene), 2026.

What To Build

  • Define the smallest representative template-go-service golden workflow and capture expected inputs, outputs, and evidence artifacts.
  • Add fixtures for a successful path, an ambiguous/degraded path, and a failure path.
  • Publish a command that local agents and CI can run before shipping related changes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A short design note names the repo-specific workflow, threat or correctness model, and the research assumptions being adopted.
  • A runnable check, fixture, or verifier exercises the new contract in CI or an equivalent local command documented in the repo.
  • The implementation emits or stores enough evidence for a downstream agent/operator to cite inputs, decisions, and outputs.
  • At least one negative/degraded-mode case is covered so failures are observable rather than silently accepted.
  • Documentation links the new behavior to the relevant EvalOps platform primitive or explicitly records why this repo remains standalone.

Notes

  • Generated issue 1/5 for evalops/template-go-service by evalops_org_miner.py.
  • Before implementation, confirm the sampled latent-spec snippets still match main; this issue intentionally cites exact file paths/lines where the mining pass saw them.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions