Another one about the v prefix for pre-release.
#601
Unanswered
kristof-mattei
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
I think semver module swallowed any v(s) on parsing: Line 184 in a60f0f6 Have you tried with prefix attribute? |
0 replies
|
Thank you @crazy-max. I think I understand now, but to be sure: Would it be correct to state that the On the output side of the equation: the current codebase does not emit Equally, the output side seems to be smart to not double-emit a |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Based on an answer here: #517 (comment)
Based on this statement, shouldn't
v{{version}}still work forv0.1.0-beta.1? After all, we have more than{major}or{major}.{minor}?The docs state:
So in this case, why is the
vswallowed when we usefor version
v0.1.0-beta.1?I seem to be missing a piece of the puzzle.
All reactions