From 8e0cceb0a13f9bb46cfb3f020440b937e23abbf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: croadfeldt Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 23:17:42 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] dav: expand the DCM validation corpus (compute/cross-domain/governance/identity/infrastructure/observability use-cases) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Adds the remainder of the DCM validation use-case corpus developed upstream — tenancy, brownfield adoption, composite services, audit-chain, policy resolution, identity/delegation, bootstrap, rehydration, drift/telemetry. Depends on #65 (initial corpus import); kept as a separate additive slice so Signed-off-by: croadfeldt #65's in-flight review threads are undisturbed. --- .../compute/idempotent-reconvergence.yaml | 63 ++++++++++++++++ dav/use-cases/compute/tenancy-data-model.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++ .../vm-tenant-isolation-enforcement.yaml | 61 ++++++++++++++++ .../brownfield-adoption-capability.yaml | 54 ++++++++++++++ .../brownfield-adoption-data-model.yaml | 54 ++++++++++++++ .../composite-service-provision.yaml | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ .../composite-service-to-catalog-item.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++ .../cross-dcm-audit-data-model.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++ .../cross-domain/dynamic-rehydration.yaml | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ .../peer-coordination-capability.yaml | 51 +++++++++++++ .../profile-approved-list-data-model.yaml | 55 ++++++++++++++ .../profile-resolution-capability.yaml | 55 ++++++++++++++ .../provider-portable-rebuild.yaml | 69 ++++++++++++++++++ .../data/four-state-store-conformance.yaml | 61 ++++++++++++++++ .../governance/audit-chain-data-model.yaml | 50 +++++++++++++ .../audit-chain-output-verification.yaml | 54 ++++++++++++++ .../audit-chain-proofs-capability.yaml | 53 ++++++++++++++ .../policy-applicability-data-model.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++ .../policy-resolution-capability.yaml | 53 ++++++++++++++ .../sovereignty-validation-policy.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++ .../identity/actor-authentication.yaml | 59 +++++++++++++++ .../identity/connected-delegation.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++ .../identity-reference-data-model.yaml | 54 ++++++++++++++ .../bare-metal-pxe-bootstrap.yaml | 61 ++++++++++++++++ .../infrastructure/cluster-bootstrap.yaml | 61 ++++++++++++++++ .../control-plane-deployment.yaml | 59 +++++++++++++++ .../profile-based-deployment.yaml | 66 +++++++++++++++++ .../drift-detection-remediation.yaml | 68 ++++++++++++++++++ .../rehydration-rto-measurement.yaml | 62 ++++++++++++++++ .../telemetry-export-capability.yaml | 55 ++++++++++++++ .../telemetry-udlm-data-model.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++ 31 files changed, 1823 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/compute/idempotent-reconvergence.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/compute/tenancy-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/compute/vm-tenant-isolation-enforcement.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-capability.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-provision.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-to-catalog-item.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/cross-dcm-audit-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/dynamic-rehydration.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/peer-coordination-capability.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-approved-list-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-resolution-capability.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/cross-domain/provider-portable-rebuild.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/data/four-state-store-conformance.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-output-verification.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-proofs-capability.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/governance/policy-applicability-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/governance/policy-resolution-capability.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/governance/sovereignty-validation-policy.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/identity/actor-authentication.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/identity/connected-delegation.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/identity/identity-reference-data-model.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/infrastructure/bare-metal-pxe-bootstrap.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/infrastructure/cluster-bootstrap.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/infrastructure/control-plane-deployment.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/infrastructure/profile-based-deployment.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/observability/drift-detection-remediation.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/observability/rehydration-rto-measurement.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-export-capability.yaml create mode 100644 dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-udlm-data-model.yaml diff --git a/dav/use-cases/compute/idempotent-reconvergence.yaml b/dav/use-cases/compute/idempotent-reconvergence.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..26dd44d --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/compute/idempotent-reconvergence.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-idempotent-001 +handle: compute/idempotent-reconvergence +scenario: + description: An application team re-applies an unchanged intent to an already-realized + resource. The system must recognize that the intent matches the current realized + state and produce a no-op — no new dispatch, no new provider calls, no duplicate + resources. This validates the idempotency guarantee that is critical for safe reconvergence + and rehydration. + actor: + persona: application-team-member + profile: standard + intent: Re-apply unchanged intent and verify no-op reconvergence + success_criteria: + - Re-applied intent is accepted and processed through the pipeline + - System detects that realized state already matches the intent + - No new provider dispatch occurs (no-op) + - No duplicate resources are created + - The no-op decision and its rationale are recorded in the audit trail + - Resource UUIDs remain stable (no reassignment) + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: modification + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: intent compared against realized state + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policy evaluates the re-applied request + - domain: audit + interaction: no-op decision recorded with rationale +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- compute +- idempotent +- reconvergence +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 3 + sequence: 10 + week: wk4 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-composite-001 + preconditions: + - Resource is realized and matches the previously declared intent + - Four-state stores are populated + postconditions: + - No new provider dispatch occurred + - Resource state is unchanged + - Audit trail records the no-op diff --git a/dav/use-cases/compute/tenancy-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/compute/tenancy-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e67ec68 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/compute/tenancy-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +uuid: uc-tenancy-data-model +handle: compute/tenancy-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for A2: confirm UDLM models the data behind data-plane tenant isolation + — resource tenancy fields binding a resource to its tenant, and the tenant_boundary DCMGroup that + network/storage attachments are confined to.' + actor: + persona: application-team-member + profile: standard + intent: Validate UDLM models resource tenancy fields and the tenant_boundary DCMGroup + success_criteria: + - A resource record models the tenancy fields binding it to its tenant + - The tenant boundary is modeled as a tenant_boundary DCMGroup + - Network and storage attachments reference the tenant boundary in the model + - An attachment crossing the tenant boundary is representable as a rejected/violating state + - The isolation decision is representable in the audit model + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: hard_dependencies + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: resource tenancy fields + tenant_boundary DCMGroup modeled + - domain: policy + interaction: tenant-isolation applicability representable + - domain: audit + interaction: isolation decision representable +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- a2 +- tenancy +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/compute/vm-tenant-isolation-enforcement.yaml b/dav/use-cases/compute/vm-tenant-isolation-enforcement.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0feb2e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/compute/vm-tenant-isolation-enforcement.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +uuid: uc-tenant-iso-001 +handle: compute/vm-tenant-isolation-enforcement +scenario: + description: A VM is provisioned for a team within a multi-tenant DCM deployment. + The platform must enforce tenant isolation at the data plane — the VM's network + and storage attachments are confined to the tenant boundary, and a tenant-isolation + policy is evaluated and applied before the attachments are realized. This is the + reusable data-plane tenancy building block, split out from compute/vm-standard-provision + (Piotr PR-65 #2) so the isolation concern is validated on its own. + actor: + persona: application-team-member + profile: standard + intent: Provision a VM whose network and storage attachments are confined to the + requesting team's tenant boundary + success_criteria: + - Tenant-isolation policy is evaluated and applied to the VM's network attachments + - Tenant-isolation policy is evaluated and applied to the VM's storage attachments + - Attachments that would cross the tenant boundary are rejected, not silently allowed + - The resource record carries the tenancy fields binding the VM to its tenant boundary + - The isolation decision (policies evaluated + outcome) is recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: hard_dependencies + policy_complexity: multi_policy_chain + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: policy + interaction: tenant-isolation policy evaluates network and storage attachments + against the tenant boundary + - domain: provider + interaction: network and storage providers realize attachments only within the + tenant boundary + - domain: data + interaction: resource record created with tenancy fields binding the VM to its + tenant_boundary DCMGroup + - domain: audit + interaction: isolation policies-evaluated and outcome recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- compute +- vm +- tenancy +- data-plane-isolation +- standard-profile +- foundational +- split-from-vm-standard-provision +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-capability.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-capability.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e40a462 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-capability.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +uuid: uc-brownfield-adoption-capability +handle: cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-capability +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-A: confirm DCM provides the capability to adopt an existing estate + in place (ingest hosts/groups/credentials as entities with zero resource recreation), track divergence + as drift during a coexistence window, perform the cutover authority flip (legacy->DCM-authoritative), + and remain reversible before cutover. This checks the CAPABILITY exists to support cross-domain/ansible-inventory-brownfield-ingestion.' + actor: + persona: platform-operator + profile: standard + intent: Validate DCM exposes the brownfield adopt-in-place + coexistence + cutover capability + success_criteria: + - DCM can ingest discovered resources as entities without recreating or restarting them (adopt-in-place) + - DCM tracks divergence between legacy-controlled state and ingested entities as drift during coexistence + - DCM supports a cutover that flips authority to the DCM API as the single control path + - Ingestion is reversible before cutover (removing DCM management leaves the estate as found) + - Post-cutover out-of-band change handling is a policy-configurable action (default reject+alert) + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: brownfield_ingestion + resource_complexity: cross_dependency_payload + policy_complexity: multi_policy_chain + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: information provider enumerates the existing estate for adopt-in-place + - domain: policy + interaction: coexistence policy classifies drift by phase; cutover flips management authority + - domain: data + interaction: entities adopted with brownfield provenance; no resource recreation + - domain: audit + interaction: adoption, drift, and cutover recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-a +- brownfield +- capability-validation +- trifecta +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f2575d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +uuid: uc-brownfield-adoption-data-model +handle: cross-domain/brownfield-adoption-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-A: confirm UDLM models the data needed for brownfield adoption — + brownfield provenance on entities, a per-entity management_authority (legacy|dcm) that flips at cutover, + Discovered-state drift records, DCMGroup mappings for ingested groups, and vault-backed credential + resources replacing embedded plaintext.' + actor: + persona: platform-operator + profile: standard + intent: Validate UDLM models the brownfield adoption data (provenance, management authority, drift) + success_criteria: + - Each ingested entity carries provenance marking it brownfield + - Each entity carries a management_authority field with values legacy or dcm + - Discovered-state drift records are modeled and persist across the coexistence window + - Ingested inventory groups map to DCMGroup entities with membership preserved + - Embedded plaintext credentials become vault-backed credential resources in the model + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: brownfield_ingestion + resource_complexity: cross_dependency_payload + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: entities, DCMGroups, credential resources, and drift records modeled with brownfield + provenance + - domain: provider + interaction: config-management system represented as an information provider + - domain: audit + interaction: provenance and authority transitions recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-a +- brownfield +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-provision.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-provision.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe50782 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-provision.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-composite-001 +handle: cross-domain/composite-service-provision +scenario: + description: An application team submits a composite service request (e.g., a + three-tier web application — web, app, database). DCM decomposes the composite + into constituents, resolves dependencies, evaluates validation policies + (including sovereignty constraints), selects providers via the placement engine, + and realizes each constituent in dependency order. This is the "easy consumption" + proof — a single intent produces a full running stack. + actor: + persona: application-team-member + profile: standard + intent: Provision a composite service from a single intent declaration + success_criteria: + - Composite service request is accepted and decomposed into constituents + - Dependencies are resolved and constituents are dispatched in the correct order + (dependency rounds) + - Validation policies (including sovereignty) are evaluated before each dispatch + - Each constituent is realized by the selected service provider + - All four states (intent, requested, realized, discovered) are populated for the + composite entity + - The composite entity status reflects OPERATIONAL when all required constituents + succeed + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: composite_service + policy_complexity: multi_validation + provider_landscape: multi_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policies evaluate sovereignty and business rules before + dispatch + - domain: provider + interaction: service providers realize each constituent + - domain: data + interaction: composite entity created across all four states + - domain: audit + interaction: full provisioning arc recorded with dependency ordering +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- cross-domain +- composite-service +- provision +- full-stack +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 2 + sequence: 6 + week: wk3 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-catalog-001 + preconditions: + - Composite service catalog item is registered and visible + - Actor holds a valid Keycloak token with tenant and role claims + postconditions: + - Composite service is realized with all constituents operational + - All four states reflect the complete provisioning arc + - Intent matches realized state diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-to-catalog-item.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-to-catalog-item.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e7de4d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/composite-service-to-catalog-item.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-catalog-001 +handle: cross-domain/composite-service-to-catalog-item +scenario: + description: A platform engineer registers a composite service definition as a + catalog item in DCM. The composite service declares multiple constituent resource + types (e.g., web tier, app tier, database tier) with dependencies between them. + A process provider may convert an external format (e.g., likeC4) to DCM's native + composite service format before registration. DCM does not natively speak + customer-specific formats; UDLM is the core design language. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Register a composite service definition as a catalog item + success_criteria: + - Composite service definition is registered as a catalog item + - All constituent resource types are declared with dependencies + - Dependency graph is acyclic and validated + - Catalog item is visible in the service catalog + - Registration is recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: composite_service + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: process provider converts external format if needed; service provider + registers catalog item + - domain: data + interaction: catalog item and constituent definitions created + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policy checks composite definition completeness + - domain: audit + interaction: registration recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- cross-domain +- composite-service +- catalog +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 2 + sequence: 5 + week: wk3 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-cp-001 + - uc-pipeline-authn-001 + preconditions: + - DCM control plane is deployed and accepting requests + - Actor holds a valid Keycloak token + postconditions: + - Composite service catalog item is registered and visible + - Constituent dependency graph is validated and stored diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/cross-dcm-audit-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/cross-dcm-audit-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e699995 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/cross-dcm-audit-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +uuid: uc-cross-dcm-audit-data-model +handle: cross-domain/cross-dcm-audit-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for A4: confirm UDLM models the data for peer-coordinated decommission — + peer-ack metadata on the released resource and a cross-DCM audit record stitched consistently across + both instances.' + actor: + persona: sovereign-tenant-admin + profile: sovereign + intent: Validate UDLM models peer-ack metadata and a consistent cross-DCM audit record + success_criteria: + - The released resource record models peer-acknowledgement metadata + - A cross-DCM audit record is modeled and is consistent across both instances + - Pending (held) state is representable when the peer is unreachable + - The peer's attested capability set at transaction time is recorded + - Residency-check evidence is captured in the model + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: decommission + resource_complexity: hard_dependencies + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: peer_dcm_required + governance_context: sovereignty_enforced + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: peer-ack metadata + cross-DCM audit record modeled consistently + - domain: audit + interaction: cross-instance audit stitched +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- a4 +- peer-dcm +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- sovereign-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/dynamic-rehydration.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/dynamic-rehydration.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..53809d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/dynamic-rehydration.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-rehydrate-001 +handle: cross-domain/dynamic-rehydration +scenario: + description: All managed resources are destroyed (simulating a disaster). The system + reads the stored intent states and dependency graph from the data model, derives + a rebuild plan dynamically (not a static replay), re-evaluates validation policies + (including sovereignty), resolves providers via the placement engine, and executes + the rebuild. This is the headline demo — proving that DCM can reconstruct a full + environment from its data model alone. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Dynamically rebuild all resources from stored intent after total destruction + success_criteria: + - All resources are destroyed (realized state cleared) + - System derives a rebuild plan from stored intent and dependency graph + - The plan is computed dynamically, not replayed from a recorded sequence + - Validation policies (including sovereignty) are re-evaluated during rebuild + - Providers are resolved via the standard placement engine + - All resources are re-realized in the correct dependency order + - UUIDs are preserved across the destroy/rebuild cycle + - Post-rebuild realized state matches the original intent state + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: rehydration_faithful + resource_complexity: full_stack + policy_complexity: multi_validation + provider_landscape: multi_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: intent state read, dependency graph computed, all four states repopulated + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policies re-evaluated including sovereignty + - domain: provider + interaction: service providers re-realize each resource + - domain: audit + interaction: full destroy and rebuild arc recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- cross-domain +- rehydration +- dynamic +- rebuild +- headline +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 4 + sequence: 11 + week: wk4 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-composite-001 + - uc-pipeline-4state-001 + preconditions: + - Resources were previously realized and are now destroyed + - Intent state and dependency graph are preserved in the data stores + postconditions: + - All resources are re-realized matching original intent + - UUIDs are preserved + - Four-state stores are fully repopulated diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/peer-coordination-capability.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/peer-coordination-capability.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7ea94ed --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/peer-coordination-capability.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +uuid: uc-peer-coordination-capability +handle: cross-domain/peer-coordination-capability +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for A4: confirm DCM provides the peer-coordination capability — a two-phase + release across DCM instances, verifying the peer meets the provenance floor before coordinating, releasing + local only after peer-ack, and holding (not silently completing) when the peer is unreachable.' + actor: + persona: sovereign-tenant-admin + profile: sovereign + intent: Validate DCM can run a peer-coordinated two-phase release with hold-on-unreachable + success_criteria: + - DCM coordinates a two-phase release with a peer DCM instance + - The peer's attested capability set is verified to meet the provenance floor before coordinating + - Local release happens only after the peer acknowledges + - If the peer is unreachable the operation is held pending, not silently completed + - Residency constraints are checked during the coordinated wind-down + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: decommission + resource_complexity: hard_dependencies + policy_complexity: cross_domain_constraint + provider_landscape: peer_dcm_required + governance_context: sovereignty_enforced + failure_mode: peer_dcm_disconnect + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: peer_dcm provider coordinates the two-phase release + - domain: policy + interaction: sovereignty policy mandates the peer replica and verifies the provenance floor + - domain: audit + interaction: peer-ack evidence captured +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- a4 +- peer-dcm +- capability-validation +- trifecta +- sovereign-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-approved-list-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-approved-list-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6c00bec --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-approved-list-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +uuid: uc-profile-approved-list-data-model +handle: cross-domain/profile-approved-list-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-B: confirm UDLM models the approved-list profile data — the instance + approved_profiles set + default_profile, a profile as a named capability set, the tenant_boundary + and policy_profile DCMGroups, and the compliance/sovereignty overlay (Sovereignty Zone + Accreditation) + as a separate axis composed with the profile.' + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: fsi + intent: Validate UDLM models approved-list profiles, default, and the profile/overlay binding + success_criteria: + - The instance models an approved_profiles set and a default_profile + - A profile is modeled as a named, versioned capability set (not a fixed enum value) + - Tenant is a tenant_boundary DCMGroup bound to a policy_profile DCMGroup — no separate mapping artifact + - Compliance/sovereignty overlay (Sovereignty Zone + Accreditation) is a distinct, composable axis + - Quota allocations and claims-mapping references are modeled on the tenant + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: composite_service + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: compliance_gated + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: fsi + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: approved_profiles, default_profile, capability-set profiles, DCMGroups, overlay, quotas + modeled + - domain: policy + interaction: profile binding expressed via policy_profile DCMGroup + - domain: audit + interaction: profile + overlay binding recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-b +- profile +- approved-list +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- fsi-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-resolution-capability.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-resolution-capability.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cde608f --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/profile-resolution-capability.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +uuid: uc-profile-resolution-capability +handle: cross-domain/profile-resolution-capability +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-B: confirm DCM provides profile resolution (an instance declares + an approved list of profiles + a default; near-term the default applies instance-wide) and atomic + tenant onboarding (identity boundary + profile binding + quotas + auth claims, all-or-nothing).' + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: fsi + intent: Validate DCM resolves the instance profile from the approved list + default and onboards atomically + success_criteria: + - DCM resolves the instance profile from the platform approved list and default + - Tenant onboarding binds the tenant to the resolved profile via a policy_profile DCMGroup + - Onboarding is atomic — either all steps persist or none do + - A compliance/sovereignty overlay is composed with the profile, not folded into it + - Profiles are capability sets compared by content set-containment, not by rank + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: composite_service + policy_complexity: orchestration_flow_static + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: compliance_gated + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: fsi + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: policy + interaction: profile resolution from approved-list+default; onboarding atomicity enforced by orchestration + flow policy + - domain: data + interaction: tenant bound to instance profile; compliance overlay composed separately + - domain: provider + interaction: auth provider configured with the tenant claims-mapping reference + - domain: audit + interaction: atomic onboarding recorded as one record +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-b +- profile +- approved-list +- capability-validation +- trifecta +- fsi-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/provider-portable-rebuild.yaml b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/provider-portable-rebuild.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..45aeb36 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/cross-domain/provider-portable-rebuild.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-portable-001 +handle: cross-domain/provider-portable-rebuild +scenario: + description: A service provider becomes unavailable during or after provisioning. + The placement engine re-resolves the affected resources onto an alternate eligible + provider. Provider-specific references are rewritten. The rebuild proceeds using + only the intent state and the new provider's capabilities. This UC validates that + DCM's provider abstraction enables true portability — resources are not locked + to a single provider. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Re-resolve and rebuild resources on an alternate provider after provider + failure + success_criteria: + - Provider unavailability is detected (via health check or explicit deregistration) + - Affected resources are re-resolved onto an alternate eligible provider + - Provider-specific references (naturalization) are rewritten for the new provider + - Resources are re-realized on the alternate provider + - Realized state matches the original intent (provider-neutral fields) + - The re-resolution and rebuild are recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: rehydration_provider_portable + resource_complexity: multi_dependent + policy_complexity: multi_validation + provider_landscape: multi_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: single_provider_failure + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: original provider unavailable; alternate selected via placement engine + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policies re-evaluated for alternate provider + - domain: data + interaction: provider references rewritten; realized state updated + - domain: audit + interaction: portability event and re-resolution recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- cross-domain +- portability +- provider +- rebuild +- stretch +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 5 + sequence: 13 + week: wk5 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-composite-001 + preconditions: + - Resources are realized on a specific provider + - An alternate eligible provider is registered + - The original provider becomes unavailable + postconditions: + - Resources are re-realized on the alternate provider + - Intent-to-realized alignment is maintained diff --git a/dav/use-cases/data/four-state-store-conformance.yaml b/dav/use-cases/data/four-state-store-conformance.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9afc881 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/data/four-state-store-conformance.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-4state-001 +handle: data/four-state-store-conformance +scenario: + description: A platform engineer verifies that the four-state data stores (intent, + requested, realized, discovered) conform to the UDLM specification. Each store + maintains the correct entity lifecycle, UUIDs are stable across states, and state + transitions follow the declared rules. This UC validates the data substrate that + all provisioning, drift detection, and rehydration UCs depend on. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Verify four-state data store conformance to the UDLM specification + success_criteria: + - Intent store preserves the original consumer declaration immutably + - Requested store records the policy-approved dispatch payload + - Realized store records provider-confirmed outcomes as authoritative + - Discovered store records independently observed current state + - Entity UUIDs are stable across all four states + - State transitions follow UDLM lifecycle rules (no skipping states) + - Four-state stores are queryable via the standard API + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: no_policy + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: all four state stores are exercised and verified + - domain: audit + interaction: conformance verification recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- data +- four-state +- udlm +- conformance +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 2 + sequence: 7 + week: wk2-3 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-cp-001 + preconditions: + - DCM control plane is deployed with four-state stores initialized + postconditions: + - Four-state stores are UDLM-conformant and queryable + - Entity lifecycle transitions are validated diff --git a/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e692661 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +uuid: uc-audit-chain-data-model +handle: governance/audit-chain-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-D: confirm UDLM models the audit-chain data — audit events, epochs, + signed tree heads, and inclusion/consistency proofs as append-only, schema-defined artifacts addressable + by handle and epoch.' + actor: + persona: compliance-auditor + profile: sovereign + intent: Validate UDLM models the audit chain (events, epochs, tree heads, proofs) as append-only + success_criteria: + - Audit events are modeled as append-only artifacts addressable by handle and epoch + - Epochs and their signed tree heads are modeled + - Inclusion and consistency proofs are modeled as read-only derived artifacts + - The model enforces append-only semantics (no in-place mutation of recorded events) + - Signing/attestation metadata for tree heads is modeled + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: modification + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: audit_heavy + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: audit events, epochs, tree heads, and proofs modeled append-only + - domain: audit + interaction: proof artifacts derived read-only from the chain +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-d +- audit +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- sovereign-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-output-verification.yaml b/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-output-verification.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ef4b56b --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-output-verification.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +uuid: uc-audit-chain-output-verification +handle: governance/audit-chain-output-verification +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-D (closes the produce->verify loop): an auditor takes the signed + tree heads + inclusion and consistency proofs DCM produced and independently re-verifies them; the + proofs validate for untampered events, and a tampered or missing event is detected. This validates + the OUTPUT of governance/audit-merkle-tree-verification, not just that proofs are produced.' + actor: + persona: compliance-auditor + profile: sovereign + intent: Validate an auditor can independently re-verify the audit-chain proofs and detect tampering + success_criteria: + - Independently re-verifying inclusion proofs against the signed tree heads succeeds for untampered + events + - Consistency proofs confirm the tree heads form a coherent append-only sequence + - A tampered or removed event is detected (its proof fails verification) + - Verification is a read-only operation that modifies no tenant resources + - Under sovereign profile the signing key material never leaves the boundary during verification + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: modification + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: cross_domain_constraint + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: audit_heavy + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: audit + interaction: auditor re-verifies inclusion and consistency proofs against signed tree heads + - domain: policy + interaction: sovereignty policy confirms signing-key residency during verification + - domain: data + interaction: audit events looked up by handle and epoch for proof generation +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-d +- audit +- output-verification +- produce-verify-loop +- trifecta +- sovereign-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-proofs-capability.yaml b/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-proofs-capability.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..08c2819 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/governance/audit-chain-proofs-capability.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +uuid: uc-audit-chain-proofs-capability +handle: governance/audit-chain-proofs-capability +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-D: confirm DCM provides the transparency-log capability — produce + signed Merkle tree heads, inclusion proofs for requested events, and consistency proofs across epochs, + with signing key material kept in-boundary under sovereign profile. (Single-signer v1; external witness + validation is a tracked follow-up.)' + actor: + persona: compliance-auditor + profile: sovereign + intent: Validate DCM can produce signed tree heads + inclusion/consistency proofs with in-boundary signing + success_criteria: + - DCM produces signed tree heads for every audit epoch covering a requested range + - DCM produces inclusion proofs for each requested event + - DCM produces consistency proofs across epoch tree heads + - Signing key material is kept within the sovereignty boundary + - v1 is single-signer; split-view/equivocation is a known limitation pending external witnesses + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: modification + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: cross_domain_constraint + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: audit_heavy + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: audit + interaction: DCM generates tree heads, inclusion proofs, and consistency proofs + - domain: policy + interaction: sovereignty policy pins signing-key residency + - domain: provider + interaction: information provider serves tree-heads and proofs +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-d +- audit +- transparency-log +- capability-validation +- trifecta +- sovereign-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/governance/policy-applicability-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/governance/policy-applicability-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7ff9915 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/governance/policy-applicability-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +uuid: uc-policy-applicability-data-model +handle: governance/policy-applicability-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-E: confirm UDLM models the data behind policy applicability — the + approved-list/default, the resolved profile and its policy set on the request record, and a three-state + policy outcome (evaluated-pass / evaluated-fail / out-of-scope) in the audit model.' + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Validate UDLM models resolved-profile policy sets and three-state audit outcomes + success_criteria: + - The request record models the resolved profile and the set of policies it carries + - 'The audit model represents three policy outcomes: evaluated-pass, evaluated-fail, out-of-scope' + - Out-of-scope is a first-class modeled outcome, not an absence or a pass + - Approved-list and default profile are modeled at the instance level + - Policy membership in a profile is modeled (which policies a profile carries) + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: cross_dependency_payload + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: resolved profile + policy set on the request; three-state outcome modeled + - domain: policy + interaction: profile->policy membership modeled + - domain: audit + interaction: three-state outcome represented +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-e +- policy +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/governance/policy-resolution-capability.yaml b/dav/use-cases/governance/policy-resolution-capability.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4641da0 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/governance/policy-resolution-capability.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +uuid: uc-policy-resolution-capability +handle: governance/policy-resolution-capability +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-E: confirm DCM provides policy applicability by resolved-profile + membership — it resolves the request profile (approved-list selection or platform default), evaluates + only the policies in that profile, and records a three-state audit outcome (evaluated-pass / evaluated-fail + / out-of-scope) with out-of-scope distinct from skipped-and-passed.' + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Validate DCM resolves the request profile and produces three-state policy outcomes + success_criteria: + - DCM resolves the request's profile and selects that profile's policies by construction + - Policies not in the resolved profile are not evaluated + - The audit outcome distinguishes evaluated-pass, evaluated-fail, and out-of-scope + - Out-of-scope policies are never recorded as skipped-and-passed (no silent soft-pass) + - No global policy fall-through evaluates policies outside the resolved profile + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: cross_dependency_payload + policy_complexity: governance_matrix_enforcement + provider_landscape: mixed + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: policy + interaction: engine resolves profile, selects its policies, emits three-state outcomes + - domain: data + interaction: request stores the resolved profile and its policy set + - domain: audit + interaction: policies-evaluated listed honestly with three-state outcomes +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-e +- policy +- resolved-profile +- capability-validation +- trifecta +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/governance/sovereignty-validation-policy.yaml b/dav/use-cases/governance/sovereignty-validation-policy.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..47589c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/governance/sovereignty-validation-policy.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-sov-001 +handle: governance/sovereignty-validation-policy +scenario: + description: A platform engineer configures a sovereignty validation policy that + blocks resource placement in non-compliant zones. When a provisioning request + arrives, the validation policy (enforcement_class compliance) evaluates the request + against the declared sovereignty zone constraints. Non-compliant placements are + denied. This UC validates that sovereignty constraints are enforced as hard gates + in the provisioning pipeline. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: sovereign + intent: Configure and enforce sovereignty validation policy for resource placement + success_criteria: + - Sovereignty validation policy is registered and active + - Placement requests within compliant zones are approved + - Placement requests to non-compliant zones are denied with a clear sovereignty + violation error + - Policy evaluation and outcome are recorded in the audit trail + - The policy operates correctly in shadow mode before enforcement + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: cross_domain + provider_landscape: multi_eligible + governance_context: sovereign_mandate + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: policy + interaction: sovereignty validation policy evaluates placement constraints + - domain: provider + interaction: placement engine selects only compliant providers + - domain: data + interaction: policy evaluation results stored + - domain: audit + interaction: sovereignty evaluation recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- governance +- sovereignty +- validation-policy +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 2 + sequence: 8 + week: wk3 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-cp-001 + preconditions: + - DCM control plane is deployed + - Sovereignty zones are registered + - At least one validation policy with enforcement_class compliance is configured + postconditions: + - Sovereignty constraints are enforced at placement time + - Non-compliant placements are blocked diff --git a/dav/use-cases/identity/actor-authentication.yaml b/dav/use-cases/identity/actor-authentication.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..917d573 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/identity/actor-authentication.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-authn-001 +handle: identity/actor-authentication +scenario: + description: An actor authenticates against the identity provider (Keycloak). The + control plane validates the token and maps claims (tenant, roles, profile) to a + DCM actor identity. This is the foundational authentication step that all other + pipeline UCs depend on. Keycloak handles authentication; authorization is a + separate concern (authz model TBD — Authorino vs Kessel vs OPA-native). + actor: + persona: application-team-member + profile: standard + intent: Authenticate against the identity provider and obtain a DCM actor identity + success_criteria: + - Actor receives a valid token with tenant and role claims + - Control plane validates the token and resolves it to a DCM actor identity + - Authentication event is recorded in the audit trail + - Invalid or expired tokens are rejected with a clear error + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: no_policy + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: identity + interaction: Keycloak validates credentials and issues token + - domain: data + interaction: actor identity reference created or resolved + - domain: audit + interaction: authentication event recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- identity +- authentication +- keycloak +- foundational +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 0 + sequence: 1 + week: wk2 + depends_on: [] + preconditions: + - Keycloak is deployed and configured with the DCM realm + postconditions: + - Actor holds a valid Keycloak token with tenant and role claims + - Control plane has resolved the actor's DCM identity diff --git a/dav/use-cases/identity/connected-delegation.yaml b/dav/use-cases/identity/connected-delegation.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8cca029 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/identity/connected-delegation.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +uuid: uc-identity-deleg-001 +handle: identity/connected-delegation +scenario: + description: A request requires an authorization decision (is this actor a member + of the group permitted to perform the action?). In a connected deployment, DCM + DELEGATES the authn/authz resolution to the IdP (Keycloak/RHSSO) at decision time + and does NOT maintain an authoritative cache of user/group membership. DCM persists + only references (subject/group IDs, claims mappings); the IdP is authoritative. + This is the connected happy path and the capability that makes DR-C real — because + DCM resolves live and holds no membership cache, there is nothing to drift in the + connected case (the disconnected/sovereign projection-drift case is + identity/auth-provider-drift-detection). Validates that DCM treats identity as a + delegated provider capability, not a thing it re-owns. + actor: + persona: application-team-member + profile: prod + intent: Have an access decision resolved by delegating to the authoritative IdP, + with DCM holding only references and no membership cache + success_criteria: + - The authorization decision is resolved by querying the IdP at decision time + - DCM persists only identity references (subject/group IDs, claims mappings) — never + an authoritative membership store + - No DCM-side membership cache is consulted as a source of truth for the decision + - The decision and the IdP as its source are recorded in the audit trail + - With the IdP authoritative and live, there is no DCM identity cache that can drift + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: prod + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: auth provider delegates the authz resolution to the IdP at decision time + - domain: data + interaction: only identity references / claims mappings are read; no membership + cache is the system of record + - domain: policy + interaction: the access gate consumes the IdP-resolved decision + - domain: audit + interaction: decision recorded with the IdP as the authoritative source +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- identity +- auth +- delegated-identity +- idp-authoritative +- no-membership-cache +- prod-profile +- happy-path +- foundational +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt diff --git a/dav/use-cases/identity/identity-reference-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/identity/identity-reference-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dc0e5e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/identity/identity-reference-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +uuid: uc-identity-reference-data-model +handle: identity/identity-reference-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for DR-C: confirm UDLM models delegated identity correctly — DCM holds identity + references (subject/group IDs, claims mappings) and, only under disconnected/sovereign, an immutable + point-in-time projection marked provenance=observed. DCM is never the authoritative system of record + for membership.' + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: sovereign + intent: Validate UDLM models identity as references + observed projection, not a membership store + success_criteria: + - Identity references (subject/group IDs, claims mappings) are modeled + - An optional point-in-time identity projection is modeled with provenance=observed + - The model marks the IdP as authoritative; DCM is not the membership system of record + - The projection is gated to disconnected/sovereign use, not a default cache + - Divergence between projection and IdP is representable as a drift record + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: drift_detection + resource_complexity: cross_dependency_payload + policy_complexity: human_escalation_required + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: sovereignty_enforced + failure_mode: data_inconsistency + profile: sovereign + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: identity references + observed projection modeled; IdP authoritative + - domain: provider + interaction: auth provider is the delegation surface to the IdP + - domain: audit + interaction: projection provenance and divergence recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- dr-c +- identity +- delegated-identity +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- sovereign-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/bare-metal-pxe-bootstrap.yaml b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/bare-metal-pxe-bootstrap.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5dcde22 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/bare-metal-pxe-bootstrap.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-bm-001 +handle: infrastructure/bare-metal-pxe-bootstrap +scenario: + description: A platform engineer boots bare-metal nodes via PXE. The discovery ISO + phones home with hardware inventory. ABI (Agent-Based Installer) installs the + operating system and base packages. This UC validates the bootstrap path from + powered-off hardware to a node ready for cluster formation. Deployment target is + containers (Podman/OCP); no direct OS/KVM install. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Bootstrap bare-metal nodes via PXE and ABI to a cluster-ready state + success_criteria: + - Bare-metal nodes PXE-boot from the discovery ISO + - Each node phones home with hardware inventory (CPU, memory, disk, NIC) + - ABI completes OS installation and base package deployment + - Node is accessible via SSH/console and reports healthy status + - Bootstrap events are recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: single_with_deps + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: bare-metal service provider executes PXE boot and ABI install + - domain: data + interaction: hardware inventory records created in discovered state + - domain: audit + interaction: bootstrap events recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- infrastructure +- bare-metal +- pxe +- bootstrap +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 1 + sequence: 2 + week: wk2 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-authn-001 + preconditions: + - Actor holds a valid Keycloak token with platform-engineer role claims + postconditions: + - Bare-metal nodes are bootstrapped with OS and base packages + - Hardware inventory is recorded in the discovered store diff --git a/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/cluster-bootstrap.yaml b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/cluster-bootstrap.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..81fa287 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/cluster-bootstrap.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-cluster-001 +handle: infrastructure/cluster-bootstrap +scenario: + description: A platform engineer forms a Kubernetes cluster from bootstrapped + bare-metal nodes. The cluster is stood up using containers (Podman/OCP) on the + bootstrapped nodes. This UC validates that the infrastructure substrate is ready + for the control plane deployment. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Form a Kubernetes cluster from bootstrapped bare-metal nodes + success_criteria: + - Kubernetes cluster is formed from bootstrapped nodes + - Cluster API server is reachable and responding + - Node membership matches the declared intent + - Cluster formation is recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: multi_dependent + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: cluster service provider orchestrates node joining + - domain: data + interaction: cluster entity created in intent and realized stores + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policy checks node readiness before joining + - domain: audit + interaction: cluster formation recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- infrastructure +- cluster +- kubernetes +- bootstrap +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 1 + sequence: 3 + week: wk2 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-bm-001 + preconditions: + - Bare-metal nodes are bootstrapped with OS and base packages + postconditions: + - Kubernetes cluster is operational with all declared nodes joined + - Cluster entity is recorded in intent and realized stores diff --git a/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/control-plane-deployment.yaml b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/control-plane-deployment.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12c8c6c --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/control-plane-deployment.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-cp-001 +handle: infrastructure/control-plane-deployment +scenario: + description: A platform engineer deploys the DCM control plane onto the bootstrapped + Kubernetes cluster. The control plane includes the convergence engine, policy + engine, request orchestrator, and the four-state data stores. This UC validates + that DCM itself is operational and ready to accept requests. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Deploy the DCM control plane onto the Kubernetes cluster + success_criteria: + - DCM control plane components are deployed and healthy (livez/readyz passing) + - Four-state data stores (intent, requested, realized, discovered) are initialized + - Policy engine is operational and evaluating + - Request orchestrator is accepting events + - Control plane deployment is recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: multi_dependent + policy_complexity: no_policy + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: container runtime deploys control plane pods + - domain: data + interaction: control plane entities created + - domain: audit + interaction: deployment events recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- infrastructure +- control-plane +- deployment +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 1 + sequence: 4 + week: wk2 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-cluster-001 + preconditions: + - Kubernetes cluster is operational with all declared nodes joined + postconditions: + - DCM control plane is deployed and accepting requests + - Four-state stores are initialized and UDLM-conformant diff --git a/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/profile-based-deployment.yaml b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/profile-based-deployment.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b31b2a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/infrastructure/profile-based-deployment.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-profile-001 +handle: infrastructure/profile-based-deployment +scenario: + description: A platform engineer deploys a full environment from a software profile + definition alone, onto plain VMs with no pre-existing state. The software profile + declares the complete stack (OS, runtime, middleware, and application layers). + This UC validates that software profiles are sufficient for reproducible + deployments without manual configuration steps. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Deploy a full environment from a software profile definition alone + success_criteria: + - Software profile definition is complete and validated + - Deployment proceeds from profile alone (no manual configuration) + - All stack layers (OS, runtime, middleware, application) are deployed + - Deployed environment matches the profile specification + - Deployment is reproducible (running it again produces identical results) + - Deployment events are recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: full_stack + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: service provider deploys from profile specification + - domain: data + interaction: profile definition consumed; realized state recorded + - domain: policy + interaction: validation policy checks profile completeness + - domain: audit + interaction: profile-based deployment recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- infrastructure +- profile +- deployment +- reproducible +- stretch +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 5 + sequence: 14 + week: wk5 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-cp-001 + preconditions: + - Software profile definition exists and is validated + - Target VMs are available and accessible + postconditions: + - Full environment is deployed matching the profile specification + - Deployment is reproducible diff --git a/dav/use-cases/observability/drift-detection-remediation.yaml b/dav/use-cases/observability/drift-detection-remediation.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cf5c1e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/observability/drift-detection-remediation.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-drift-001 +handle: observability/drift-detection-remediation +scenario: + description: The drift reconciliation component compares discovered state (what actually + exists) against realized state (what was provisioned). When a divergence is detected, + a drift record is produced with field-by-field comparison and severity classification. + Remediation actions are triggered per recovery policy. This UC validates the operational + steady-state monitoring loop. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Detect drift between discovered and realized state and remediate per recovery + policy + success_criteria: + - Discovered state is probed and compared against realized state + - Divergences produce drift records with field-by-field comparison + - Drift records include severity classification (info, warning, critical) + - Recovery policy triggers appropriate remediation actions + - Remediation results are recorded and verified + - Drift detection cycle completes within the profile-governed reconciliation window + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: drift_detection + resource_complexity: single_no_deps + policy_complexity: single_validation + provider_landscape: single_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: data_inconsistency + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: discovered and realized stores compared + - domain: policy + interaction: recovery policy governs remediation actions + - domain: provider + interaction: service provider executes remediation if needed + - domain: audit + interaction: drift detection and remediation recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- observability +- drift +- detection +- remediation +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 3 + sequence: 9 + week: wk4 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-composite-001 + - uc-pipeline-4state-001 + preconditions: + - Composite service is realized with all constituents operational + - Four-state stores are populated + - Drift reconciliation component is active + postconditions: + - Drift between discovered and realized states is detected and classified + - Remediation actions have been executed per recovery policy diff --git a/dav/use-cases/observability/rehydration-rto-measurement.yaml b/dav/use-cases/observability/rehydration-rto-measurement.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9dc7d46 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/observability/rehydration-rto-measurement.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +uuid: uc-pipeline-rto-001 +handle: observability/rehydration-rto-measurement +scenario: + description: After a dynamic rehydration, the system measures recovery time objective + (RTO) and validates completeness. Every resource in the original intent must exist + in the rebuilt realized state with matching field values. The RTO measurement is + the time from destroy trigger to last resource reaching OPERATIONAL status. + actor: + persona: platform-engineer + profile: standard + intent: Measure RTO and validate completeness after dynamic rehydration + success_criteria: + - RTO is measured from destroy trigger to last resource reaching OPERATIONAL + - Every resource in the original intent exists in the rebuilt realized state + - Field values in the rebuilt realized state match the original intent (within tolerance + for provider-assigned fields) + - Completeness percentage is calculated and reported + - RTO measurement and completeness results are recorded in the audit trail + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: rehydration_faithful + resource_complexity: full_stack + policy_complexity: no_policy + provider_landscape: multi_eligible + governance_context: standard_governance + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: intent vs rebuilt realized compared for completeness + - domain: observability + interaction: RTO measured and reported + - domain: audit + interaction: RTO and completeness recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: seed-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- observability +- rehydration +- rto +- measurement +- pipeline +version: 1.0.0 +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-30T22:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + author: chris@croadfeldt + pipeline: + act: 4 + sequence: 12 + week: wk4 + depends_on: + - uc-pipeline-rehydrate-001 + preconditions: + - Dynamic rehydration has completed + - All resources are re-realized + postconditions: + - RTO is measured and recorded + - Completeness is verified (intent matches rebuilt realized) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-export-capability.yaml b/dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-export-capability.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cb52d77 --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-export-capability.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +uuid: uc-telemetry-export-capability +handle: observability/telemetry-export-capability +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for A9: confirm DCM provides the universal telemetry-export capability — + a single UDLM-modeled, schema-discoverable export surface over standard transports (OTLP / Prometheus + / message-bus) with per-subscriber authorization and data-classification scoping, and no DCM-side + per-tool adapters.' + actor: + persona: platform-operator + profile: standard + intent: Validate DCM exposes one UDLM export surface over standard transports with per-subscriber policy + success_criteria: + - DCM exposes a single export/discovery surface consumable over standard transports (OTLP/Prometheus/bus) + - Schemas are discoverable by a consumer at subscription time (no out-of-band agreement) + - Export scope is policy-evaluated per subscriber (authorization + data classification) + - A second consuming tool attaches via the same path with no export-side change + - No DCM-side per-tool integration adapter is required + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: composite_service + policy_complexity: multi_policy_chain + provider_landscape: multiple_eligible + governance_context: audit_heavy + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: provider + interaction: information provider serves export/discovery over standard transports; message bus delivers + events + - domain: policy + interaction: per-subscriber authorization and data-classification scoping evaluated + - domain: data + interaction: telemetry exposed as UDLM-modeled discoverable data + - domain: audit + interaction: subscription and export access recorded +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- a9 +- observability +- capability-validation +- trifecta +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs) diff --git a/dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-udlm-data-model.yaml b/dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-udlm-data-model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..56dd77f --- /dev/null +++ b/dav/use-cases/observability/telemetry-udlm-data-model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +uuid: uc-telemetry-udlm-data-model +handle: observability/telemetry-udlm-data-model +version: 1.0.0 +scenario: + description: 'Validation UC for A9: confirm UDLM models the telemetry-export data — metrics, lifecycle/drift/policy + events, log records, and audit records as UDLM-modeled, schema-discoverable entities, plus a published + event catalog vocabulary for the curated event stream.' + actor: + persona: platform-operator + profile: standard + intent: Validate UDLM models telemetry/events/audit as schema-discoverable data + event catalog + success_criteria: + - Metrics, events, log records, and audit records are modeled as UDLM entities + - Schemas for those entities are discoverable (machine-readable) by consumers + - A published event-catalog vocabulary is modeled for the curated event stream + - Data-classification and tenancy are modeled on telemetry for per-subscriber scoping + - Retention governance for exported telemetry is representable + dimensions: + lifecycle_phase: new_request + resource_complexity: composite_service + policy_complexity: system_defaults_only + provider_landscape: multiple_eligible + governance_context: audit_heavy + failure_mode: happy_path + profile: standard + expected_domain_interactions: + - domain: data + interaction: telemetry/events/audit modeled as schema-discoverable UDLM entities + event catalog + - domain: policy + interaction: data-classification + retention modeled for scoping + - domain: audit + interaction: export access representable +generated_by: + mode: authoring + source: human-authored + model: null + prompt_version: trifecta-1.0 + timestamp: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' +tags: +- a9 +- observability +- data-model-validation +- trifecta +- udlm +- standard-profile +metadata: + admitted_at: '2026-06-29T00:00:00.000000+00:00' + admitted_dcm_version: preview + promoted_from_run: null + initial_baseline_path: null + author: chris@croadfeldt + note: trifecta validation UC (Piotr-feedback DRs)