Skip to content

Allow features and feature steps to have the same name? #3

@larskotthoff

Description

@larskotthoff

Should feature steps be allowed to have the same name as features? This break compatibility with llama and is in my opinion ugly because it can easily lead to confusion. I also don't see a reason why this would have to be the case.

Shall we update the spec and tests to require feature group names to be distinct from feature names?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions