Skip to content

The package_type deserves a better documentation #3413

Description

@uilianries

The Conan 2.x attribute package_type is minimally documented in Docs: package_type attribute, and is referred in others parts, but not explaining about its scenarios.

Meanwhile, its design is much more useful, giving examples of real scenarios.

It would be better including some examples in the docs, that are frequently asked in CCI:

  • What should be the package type when having both executable and libraries in a package?
  • Should change the package type when having header-only as option?
  • Should change the package type when having option to package only executables?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions