mmvec metagenomic full abundance table or sub-selected table

[lzhangxcode]

Hi :)

I have a little question related to the input.
I have a full species table from MetaPhlAn. And I also have a sub-table after selecting some species that I am interested in.
Same in metabolites table. My data is targeted metabolites data from LC/GC-MS. I have a full table also a selective table with only the ones I am interested in.

So my question is: the two types of input will have different results. May I use the full table or the selective table? Do you have any suggestions?

Best,
Lu

[mortonjt]

We haven't done rigorous testing of this. But I would expext that the ranks between the two runs should have the same ordering.

…

On Sun, Jun 21, 2020, 7:57 AM Lulu ***@***.***> wrote: Hi :) I have a little question related to the input. I have a full species table from MetaPhlAn. And I also have a sub-table after selecting some species that I am interested in. Same in metabolites table. My data is targeted metabolites data from LC/GC-MS. I have a full table also a selective table with only the ones I am interested in. So my question is: the two types of input will have different results. May I use the full table or the selective table? Do you have any suggestions? Best, Lu — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#136>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA75VXLEQAKXIVLLZLJUWQ3RXYGU5ANCNFSM4OD3ZFBQ> .