NB: this design spec is a work in progress. Ignore it for now.
Add FoG calculations to each image. FoG is to be calculated as an area-under-the-curve, relative to the RADs, as defined in the original diskImageR paper. However, we should implement one big difference - the 'new style' FoG calculations should be relative to RADs of the 24 hour timepoint (in diskImageR, they are always relative the current image's RAD, even if it's 48 or 72 hours). (This is how JAST does it today.)
Thus, in the output table, per ever RAD column, there should be a FoG column. For example, if the user requested RADs for 20% and 80% inhibition, there should be FoG20 and FoG80 columns.
More ideas:
- Also add an option for the old-style FoG calculation (relative to the RADs on the image, not the 24 hour timepoint)?
- For the new-style calculation, should we show the 24-hour RADs on the 484 hour plates? If so, how should we mark this? Perhaps dotted lines, instead of solid lines?
NB: this design spec is a work in progress. Ignore it for now.
Add FoG calculations to each image. FoG is to be calculated as an area-under-the-curve, relative to the RADs, as defined in the original diskImageR paper. However, we should implement one big difference - the 'new style' FoG calculations should be relative to RADs of the 24 hour timepoint (in diskImageR, they are always relative the current image's RAD, even if it's 48 or 72 hours). (This is how JAST does it today.)
Thus, in the output table, per ever RAD column, there should be a FoG column. For example, if the user requested RADs for 20% and 80% inhibition, there should be FoG20 and FoG80 columns.
More ideas: