Roadmap Query: Official support for Vitest (rules_vitest) vs. Community Fork #2807
gaurav-rk9
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Aspect Team,
As we move further into 2026, our team is evaluating our testing stack. We are currently heavy users of rules_js, but we are looking to standardize on Vitest for its native ESM support and performance.
I’m aware of the excellent work done on fremtind/rules_vitest, which seems to be the current community standard and is based on your rules_jest architecture.
My questions are:
Official Roadmap: Does Aspect have plans to release an official aspect-build/rules_vitest this year, or perhaps adopt/upstream the Fremtind fork?
Current Recommendation: For a high-scale monorepo requiring sharding and coverage, is the current recommendation still to use a js_test wrapper, or should we commit to the community ruleset for these specific Bazel integrations?
Thanks for the help!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions