Skip to content

Establish quarterly review cadence and process #2

@amberb617

Description

@amberb617

The charter references quarterly reviews but does not define the process.

Proposed process

  1. Review window -- two-week period each quarter for community feedback
  2. Board review meeting -- board evaluates all feedback and proposed changes
  3. Release -- updated framework version published with changelog
  4. Retrospective -- board reviews the process itself for improvement

Open questions

  • Should quarterly reviews be public or board-only?
  • How do we handle breaking changes to the framework?
  • What is the minimum notice period before a new version is released?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions