This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2025. It is now read-only.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
|
Closing this discussion, see #217 for continuation. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@danbi2990
While working on the #173 PR, I adopted a slightly different structure in the associated PR, as noted in the PR description. Specifically, I applied the following separation:
database/discussion.rs: Defines the schema struct used for database storagegraphql/discussion.rs: Defines the response struct returned from GitHub's GraphQL API (used in the GitHub Dashboard)This differs from how related structures were previously organized in other Issues and PRs.
To improve consistency and clarity across the codebase, I’d like to propose aligning the structure of Issues and PRs with the one used in Discussions. This would help ensure a unified direction for future development and make the codebase easier to navigate.
Would love to hear your thoughts on this!
All reactions