Hi @MollyMcEvilley , @rj-delacruz ,
Both Spec and Sample code was updated using new DisabilityStatus = 98:
I see two issues here - one new and one existing that we previously overlooked.
- tlsa_Person.DisabilityStatus supports the following values: -1, 0, 1, 98, and 99.
- tlsa_Enrollment.DisabilityStatus supports the following values: -2, 0, 1, and NULL.
Previously, we used tlsa_Enrollment.DisabilityStatus = 99. This is an existing issue that we previously overlooked, as 99 is not a valid DisabilityStatus value for the tlsa_Enrollment table.
The new issue is the addition of tlsa_Enrollment.DisabilityStatus = 98. However, 98 is also not a valid DisabilityStatus value for the tlsa_Enrollment table.
Could you please review this and update both the Specification and the Sample Code accordingly?
Best regards,
Natalie
Hi @MollyMcEvilley , @rj-delacruz ,
Both Spec and Sample code was updated using new DisabilityStatus = 98:
I see two issues here - one new and one existing that we previously overlooked.
Previously, we used tlsa_Enrollment.DisabilityStatus = 99. This is an existing issue that we previously overlooked, as 99 is not a valid DisabilityStatus value for the tlsa_Enrollment table.
The new issue is the addition of tlsa_Enrollment.DisabilityStatus = 98. However, 98 is also not a valid DisabilityStatus value for the tlsa_Enrollment table.
Could you please review this and update both the Specification and the Sample Code accordingly?
Best regards,
Natalie