Gap: abtem/integrals.py (FieldIntegrator and its GaussianProjectionIntegrals, ScatteringFactorProjectionIntegrals, QuadratureProjectionIntegrals subclasses) and the abtem/parametrizations machinery have zero documentation beyond the API reference.
Why it matters: Advanced users who need a non-default parametrization (or want to understand accuracy trade-offs between projection schemes) currently have to read source code.
Existing draft: docs/user_guide/appendix/potential_integrals.ipynb is a 3-cell stub, already sketched for exactly this purpose.
Suggested content: Finish that appendix: available parametrizations and how to select them, how projection integrals are computed (quadrature vs analytic Gaussian), and a worked example of a custom parametrization.
From a docs coverage audit (July 2026) comparing the abTEM public API against documentation content.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Gap:
abtem/integrals.py(FieldIntegratorand itsGaussianProjectionIntegrals,ScatteringFactorProjectionIntegrals,QuadratureProjectionIntegralssubclasses) and theabtem/parametrizationsmachinery have zero documentation beyond the API reference.Why it matters: Advanced users who need a non-default parametrization (or want to understand accuracy trade-offs between projection schemes) currently have to read source code.
Existing draft:
docs/user_guide/appendix/potential_integrals.ipynbis a 3-cell stub, already sketched for exactly this purpose.Suggested content: Finish that appendix: available parametrizations and how to select them, how projection integrals are computed (quadrature vs analytic Gaussian), and a worked example of a custom parametrization.
From a docs coverage audit (July 2026) comparing the abTEM public API against documentation content.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code