I just noticed, the ExtremesSimplifier seems broken. I had a SIMPLIFY_SIZE way larger than the datasize size. The count of values that the interpolate-function received was correct (the datasize size), but one point (i guess the median point) got multiplied (9 times of 33 points total), whereas other points were missing. As I currently don't want to simplify, I just changed to another SIMPLIFY_METHOD which works fine for me.
I guess it would be easier to add all points to a list, sort it and then copy the resulting lowest and highest numbers, like so:
#include
list<Pixel*> dataset_ordered;
list<Pixel*>::iterator dataset_it;
for(int i=0; i<dataset_size; i++)
dataset_ordered.push_back(dataset+i);
dataset_ordered.sort(cmp_function);
Maybe I need it anyway, than I would fix it myself, but I just wanted others to know that there's a problem.
I just noticed, the ExtremesSimplifier seems broken. I had a SIMPLIFY_SIZE way larger than the datasize size. The count of values that the interpolate-function received was correct (the datasize size), but one point (i guess the median point) got multiplied (9 times of 33 points total), whereas other points were missing. As I currently don't want to simplify, I just changed to another SIMPLIFY_METHOD which works fine for me.
I guess it would be easier to add all points to a list, sort it and then copy the resulting lowest and highest numbers, like so:
#include
list<Pixel*> dataset_ordered;
list<Pixel*>::iterator dataset_it;
for(int i=0; i<dataset_size; i++)
dataset_ordered.push_back(dataset+i);
dataset_ordered.sort(cmp_function);
Maybe I need it anyway, than I would fix it myself, but I just wanted others to know that there's a problem.