Skip to content

💬 [DISCUSSION] Log4j 1.x still in use - security risk assessment needed #30

Description

@github-actions

Context

We're still using Log4j 1.x (version 1.2.17) which has been EOL since 2015.

While this is NOT the same as the Log4Shell vulnerability (CVE-2021-44228, which affected Log4j 2.x), it still has known CVEs and receives no security patches:

Questions

  1. Should we prioritize migrating to Logback/SLF4J?
  2. Are we using any of the vulnerable components?
  3. What's the migration effort?

This was supposed to be done in 2022 (see task in backlog).

Files Affected

  • pom.xml (log4j dependency)
  • All files using log4j imports

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions