Create Comprehensive Bridge Risk Scoring Matrix

[Mosas2000]

## Description

Build a multi-factor risk assessment that combines reserve backing, operator reputation, transaction history, and anomaly frequency into a unified risk score.

## Requirements and context

- Combine reserve backing ratio, operator reputation, and transaction volume into risk factors

• Include anomaly frequency and resolution time in scoring

• Support configurable weights for different risk factors

• Compute historical risk trends and volatility

• Expose scores via API with detailed factor breakdowns

• Trigger risk escalation alerts for high-risk periods

  Suggested execution

  Fork the repo and create a branch

  git checkout -b feature/bridge-risk-scoring-matrix

  Implement changes

  • Create risk scoring service that aggregates multiple signals

• Define scoring formula with documented weights and thresholds

• Persist risk scores and historical trends in TimescaleDB

• Expose detailed risk factor API endpoints

• Add risk matrix visualization to the frontend dashboard

• Create risk-based alerting rules

• Document scoring methodology and factor definitions

  Example commit message

  feat: create comprehensive bridge risk scoring matrix

  Guidelines

  • Assignment required before starting
  • PR must include a closing reference to this issue
  • Timeframe: 72 hours

[Jonathan-ai9]

Hey! I can tackle this issue. I'll build the multi-factor risk assessment service that aggregates reserve backing, operator reputation, transaction history, and anomalies into a weighted risk score. I'll persist the historical trends and volatility metrics in TimescaleDB, spin up the API endpoints for the detailed factor breakdowns, and add the risk matrix visualization to the frontend dashboard alongside the alert rules. I'll also ensure everything is documented and ready within the 72-hour window.

[Jujukoder]

Good Morning Ser, How are you doing?
I’ve looked into the issue, and I have a clear path to a clean fix.

I’ll implement it in a way that matches the current architecture and avoids introducing extra complexity.

Thank you for your consideration.