Extend trust-surface protocol with authority-dependency bindings

[mdheller]

Purpose

Extend the Superconscious Trust Surface Protocol so declared trust surfaces can reference SocioSphere authority-dependency graph edges.

Related work:

• SocioProphet/ProCybernetica#49 — hybrid cybernetic control-plane reconciliation
• SocioProphet/sociosphere#326 — authority-dependency graph contract

Background

Superconscious already establishes the trust-surface doctrine:

No invisible authority.

The next binding is:

No undeclared control effect.

The current TRUST_SURFACE.yaml declares runtime class, entrypoints, network posture, filesystem posture, policy posture, model-provider posture, purge procedure, prove-clean checks, known risks, and compensating controls. This issue adds a way to connect those declared surfaces to SocioSphere authority-dependency graph edges.

Scope

Add a small docs/schema/example extension, likely:

docs/trust-surface-authority-dependencies.md
schemas/trust-surface-authority-dependency.schema.json
examples/TRUST_SURFACE.with-authority-dependencies.yaml

The extension should describe:

• authority surface id;
• owning component and repo;
• related runtime class;
• affected target class;
• policy reference;
• evidence reference;
• cancellation or recovery reference;
• purge and prove-clean relationship;
• SocioSphere graph reference.

Acceptance criteria

• Add a docs page for authority-dependency bindings.
• Add one example trust-surface extension.
• Add a schema or schema-extension draft.
• Explain the relationship to SocioProphet/sociosphere#326.
• Preserve Superconscious boundaries: visible cognition/control-loop and trust-surface seed, not canonical runtime authority.

Non-goals

• Do not implement runtime execution.
• Do not define policy law here.
• Do not define execution evidence here.
• Do not replace TRUST_SURFACE.yaml; extend its semantics.