Skip to content

About the result of SE-ResNet164 on cifar10 #3

@rederyang

Description

@rederyang

In the paper, they got 4.39 error rate on cifar10. I tried to reproduce the result but only got around 4.87 (4.73 in the best case) like your result. Did you do further experiments and what is your best result? Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions