From 1477872d8057232c96b155b657cde9c3c4c10c9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Seyed Yahya Shirazi Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 22:59:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] v2 phase 1: TiCS scaffold via manuscript-formatting --- manuscript/narrative-review/STRUCTURE.md | 77 ++ manuscript/narrative-review/abstract.md | 16 + .../narrative-review/boxes/box1_anchor.md | 18 + .../boxes/outstanding-questions.md | 22 + manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/trends.md | 20 + manuscript/narrative-review/figures.md | 31 + manuscript/narrative-review/frontmatter.yaml | 42 + manuscript/narrative-review/glossary.md | 38 + manuscript/narrative-review/highlights.md | 11 + manuscript/narrative-review/references.md | 21 + manuscript/narrative-review/refs.bib | 1105 +++++++++++++++++ .../sections/01_introduction.md | 24 + .../narrative-review/sections/02_scaffold.md | 27 + .../sections/03_psychophysics.md | 28 + .../narrative-review/sections/04_action.md | 35 + .../narrative-review/sections/05_language.md | 50 + .../narrative-review/sections/06_emotion.md | 36 + .../narrative-review/sections/07_synthesis.md | 49 + 18 files changed, 1650 insertions(+) create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/STRUCTURE.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/abstract.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/box1_anchor.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/outstanding-questions.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/trends.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/figures.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/frontmatter.yaml create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/glossary.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/highlights.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/references.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/refs.bib create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/01_introduction.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/02_scaffold.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/03_psychophysics.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/04_action.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/05_language.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/06_emotion.md create mode 100644 manuscript/narrative-review/sections/07_synthesis.md diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/STRUCTURE.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/STRUCTURE.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7180041 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/STRUCTURE.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +# Structure — TiCS Forum Review + +Built by the `manuscript:manuscript-formatting` skill (v0.5.0) in v2 Phase 1. This document maps each file to the *Trends in Cognitive Sciences* (TiCS, Cell Press) Forum Review submission element it serves. The next phase (`manuscript:manuscript-writing`) fills the placeholders. + +## Files and TiCS compliance map + +| File | TiCS element | Word budget | Notes | +|---|---|---|---| +| `frontmatter.yaml` | Title, authors, affiliations, corresponding author, ORCID | n/a | Per skill's "Title page" checklist item | +| `highlights.md` | Highlights | 3-5 bullets, <=85 chars each | TiCS / Cell Press convention | +| `abstract.md` | Abstract | ~80-120 words, no citations | TiCS abstract limit | +| `sections/01_introduction.md` | Section 1: Introduction (the per-shot turn) | ~450 | | +| `sections/02_scaffold.md` | Section 2: Four-perspective scaffold | ~600 | | +| `sections/03_psychophysics.md` | Section 3: Psychophysics (bottom-up floor) | ~500 | | +| `sections/04_action.md` | Section 4: Action (mu-band ERD and event segmentation) | ~500 | | +| `sections/05_language.md` | Section 5: Language (5a non-transfer + 5b silent-narrative) | ~600 | I5 split applied | +| `sections/06_emotion.md` | Section 6: Emotion (two latency-distinct predictions) | ~500 | | +| `sections/07_synthesis.md` | Section 7: Synthesis (integration, falsifiability, open questions) | ~450 | F4/F5 applied | +| `boxes/box1_anchor.md` | Box 1 (HBN-EEG R3 anchor cohort) | ~180 | F4 anchor case rebuilt | +| `boxes/trends.md` | Trends Box (recent developments) | ~200-250 | TiCS convention | +| `boxes/outstanding-questions.md` | Outstanding Questions Box | 5-7 questions | TiCS convention | +| `glossary.md` | Glossary | 10-15 terms | TiCS convention | +| `figures.md` | Figure legends | ~400 (not in main count) | 4 figures planned (Phase 3) | +| `references.md` | References | 80-120 entries | Cell Press numbered (Vancouver-like) | +| `refs.bib` | Source BibTeX | 94 entries | Already built (Phase 1) | + +## Main-text budget total + +Sections 1-7: ~3610 words. Inside the TiCS Forum Review ~3500-4000-word ceiling. + +## Submission checklist (from `manuscript:manuscript-formatting` SKILL.md) + +This section tracks the submission checklist items the skill enumerates. Each item is marked with the phase that will satisfy it. + +- [ ] **Manuscript formatted per journal template** — Phase 5 (final assembly via the formatting skill again) +- [x] **Title page: title, authors, affiliations, corresponding author, ORCID** — `frontmatter.yaml` (Phase 1; placeholders to be filled by author) +- [ ] **Abstract within word limit** — Phase 2 (manuscript-writing produces; Phase 5 verifies) +- [ ] **Keywords provided (if required)** — TiCS does not require keywords for Forum Reviews; not applicable +- [ ] **Main text within page/word limit** — Phase 2 budget + Phase 5 verification +- [ ] **Figures as separate high-resolution files (typically 300+ DPI)** — Phase 3 via `figures:scientific-figure` composer +- [ ] **Figure captions in a separate list** — `figures.md` (Phase 2 drafts; Phase 5 finalises) +- [ ] **Tables formatted per journal style** — no tables planned for this review +- [x] **References complete and consistently formatted** — `refs.bib` built (Phase 1); numbering applied in Phase 5 +- [ ] **Supplementary materials prepared separately** — none planned +- [ ] **Cover letter drafted** — Phase 5 (skill's cover-letter template, then humanizer pass) +- [ ] **`manuscript:humanizer` natural-writing pass** — Phase 4 +- [ ] **Conflict of interest statement** — Phase 5 (author-provided) +- [ ] **Data availability statement** — Phase 5 (HBN-EEG R3 is public; statement noted in Phase 5) +- [ ] **Ethics approval statement** — n/a (review article; no new data) +- [ ] **Author contributions (CRediT format if required)** — Phase 5 +- [ ] **Suggested reviewers** — Phase 5 (author-provided) + +## TiCS scaffolding decisions not covered by the skill + +The skill provides a generic IMRAD framework plus journal-specific templates for IEEE / Nature / PNAS / PLoS ONE / Elsevier. TiCS (Cell Press) Forum Reviews use a non-IMRAD structure that the skill does not enumerate explicitly. The following TiCS-specific decisions are applied on top of the skill's framework based on public TiCS author guidelines: + +- **No IMRAD.** TiCS Forum Reviews use thematic sections, not Introduction/Methods/Results/Discussion. The seven sections here are thematic (Introduction, Scaffold, Psychophysics, Action, Language, Emotion, Synthesis). +- **Highlights**: 3-5 short bullets at the top, each <=85 characters (Cell Press / Elsevier house style enforced via the skill's Elsevier checklist row). +- **Trends Box**: a callout box listing recent developments that make the topic timely. +- **Outstanding Questions Box**: 5-7 forward-looking research questions. +- **Glossary**: 10-15 defined terms accessible to non-specialist readers. + +## Carry-forwards from v1 self-review + +From `direction-papers/movie-ersp-direction-review.md` (kept in the project for reference): + +- **F1 (Category G cardinality 12 -> 7)**: Section 5a will state "all seven Category G cards (and 12 cards corpus-wide) carry `transfer-to-silent: no`". +- **F2 (Schubring vs Codispoti DOI)**: `refs.bib` header documents; body prose cites Codispoti. +- **F3 (stray refs)**: 3 stray keys removed from `refs.bib` (already applied). +- **F4 (anchor case)**: Section 7.2 + Box 1 rebuild around Petroni-Cohen 2018 + partly-validated pipeline. +- **F5 (falsifiability)**: Section 7.3 names a topographic-and-band rejection region. +- **I1-I5**: handled in the per-section placeholders. +- **S2 (italicised *The Present*)**: enforced throughout via copy-edit. + +## Next phase + +`manuscript:manuscript-writing` is invoked per section file. Each invocation will receive the placeholders here, the source material under `direction-papers/` and `research/`, and the TiCS section budget for that file. diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/abstract.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/abstract.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ff600f --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/abstract.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ + + +# Abstract + +[Opening sentence: the field has moved from whole-clip ISC to event-locked methods.] + +[Sentence 2: most empirical evidence is adult fMRI / iEEG / scalp-EEG ISC; per-shot ERSP in a developmental cohort viewing silent character animation has no precedent.] + +[Sentence 3: we review the four-perspective corpus that constrains the design space.] + +[Sentence 4: psychophysics, action, language, and emotion make divergent and partly-falsifiable predictions about the 0 to 500 ms post-shot-onset window.] + +[Closing sentence: HBN-EEG Release 3 viewing *The Present* (Pixar 2014) sits at this empty intersection; the 100 Hz local working set caps beta-band claims until a 500 Hz validation pass.] + + diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/box1_anchor.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/box1_anchor.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a316bc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/box1_anchor.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ + + +# Box 1: HBN-EEG Release 3 as the anchor cohort + +[Paragraph (~180 words). Describe the HBN-EEG R3 cohort: +- 5-21-year-old participants in a developmental research setting. +- 128-channel HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Net. +- Passive viewing of the 3.5-minute Pixar short *The Present* (2014). +- Local working set: 184 subjects at 100 Hz BDF (Nyquist-aware downsample of original 500 Hz). +- 56 stimulus-side shots with per-shot `onset`, `duration`, `LLR`, `has_boy`, `has_puppy` annotations. +- After invalidating 3 high-drift rows (`match_diff_s > 1.0 s`), 49 trusted rows: 20 boy-only + 15 puppy-only shots for mutually exclusive single-agent contrast. +- Pipeline: BIDS import, 1 Hz HPF, conditional cleanline (gated by Nyquist), `clean_rawdata` channel rejection, AMICA, ICLabel (brain threshold 0.69), dipfit5, std_precomp ERSP. +- F4 carry-forward statement: the anchor case rests on Petroni-Cohen 2018 (external precedent) + this partly-validated pipeline (internal feasibility). The six-feature uniqueness conjunction is *descriptive*, not evidential.] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/outstanding-questions.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/outstanding-questions.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e8d4df4 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/outstanding-questions.md @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + + +# Outstanding Questions Box + +[Budget: 5-7 questions. Each question is one sentence; forward-looking; adjudicates between perspectives or names a gap the field could fill. + +1. [Q1: per-shot ERSP in developmental cohort survives LLR and motion-energy partialling at 0-500 ms?] + +2. [Q2: mu-band ERD over central rolandic clusters elicited by animated-character action observation as it is by adult hand-action observation?] + +3. [Q3: cuteness-driven affective response in children produces a sub-second EEG signature distinguishable from generic arousal? And is the signature compatible with frontal asymmetry at sub-second timescales given reliability concerns?] + +4. [Q4: can the topographic-and-band rejection region for the four-perspective ranking be pre-registered before group analysis? Is the central-rolandic vs frontal-asymmetric vs language-network discrimination operationalisable from EEG IC clusters?] + +5. [Q5: can a multimodal vision-language embedding regressor substitute for language-model surprisal on silent stimuli?] + +6. [Q6: does within-stimulus narrative position (three-act trajectory) explain condition-level effects that survive low-level partialling in single-stimulus designs?] + +7. [Q7: residual saccade-locked variance contamination without synchronous eye tracker, and the cohort size at which ICA-only artifact rejection becomes sufficient?]] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/trends.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/trends.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bed9b87 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/boxes/trends.md @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ + + +# Trends Box: recent developments enabling the per-shot framing + +[Budget: ~200-250 words. Bullet list of 5-7 recent developments. + +- **Whole-brain shot-cut response in adult intracranial EEG.** Nentwich et al. 2023: 6328 contacts in 23 patients across 43.6 minutes of film clips; triple-regressor against optical-flow magnitude, saccade onsets, and film-cut onsets; whole-brain saccade- and cut-locked responses with motion concentrated in occipitoparietal cortex. + +- **Hidden-Markov-model recovery of event states from fMRI.** Baldassano et al. 2017: hierarchy of event boundaries from Sherlock-movie fMRI; hippocampal boundary signals predict subsequent free recall. + +- **Cross-sectional developmental EEG-ISC.** Petroni et al. 2018: whole-clip EEG-ISC reliability across ages 6-44 during passive viewing of six naturalistic videos, peaking in childhood. + +- **Silent abstract animation for MRI compliance.** Vanderwal et al. 2015: Inscapes, used by HBN itself; reliable network-level activity from a silent stimulus. + +- **Multi-level cinematic-feature regression.** Kauttonen et al. 2015: multi-level cinematic features regressed against fMRI ISC; methodological template for shot-level feature annotation. + +- **Open developmental EEG releases.** HBN-EEG and Studyforrest (Hanke et al. 2014) make large-N developmental datasets available for naturalistic-stimulus analysis at unprecedented scale.] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/figures.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/figures.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..37e80d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/figures.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ + + +# Figure legends + +## Figure 1. Four-perspective strand map + +[Caption placeholder. Compose in Phase 2 after the Phase 3 figure-qa report is in. Reference the four perspectives, the 15 corpus themes, the colour code (Okabe-Ito), and the legend's redundant shape-and-colour encoding.] + +## Figure 2. Naturalness gradient and developmental cohort coverage + +[Caption placeholder. X-axis: stimulus naturalness gradient. Y-axis: participant cohort. Markers: size by number of corpus cards, shape by modality. Highlight the (child, character animation, EEG ERSP) empty cell.] + +## Figure 3. Gap matrix + +[Caption placeholder. 8 named gaps from `research/synthesis/gap-analysis.md` versus 4 prior-effort axes. Filled cells contain representative card slugs; empty cells highlighted.] + +## Figure 4. Predictions and falsification regions, per perspective + +[Caption placeholder. Each perspective (row) gives topography (with head schematic), band, latency, pre-registered falsification region. Reference the F5 carry-forward.] + +## Figure assembly notes (for Phase 3) + +- **Composer**: `/figures:scientific-figure` (multi-panel; the recommended composer per its skill description). +- **Panel sources**: + - `/figures:svg-figure` for the matrix-style schematic panels (Figs 1, 3). + - `/figures:transparent-icons` for stimulus thumbnails (Fig 2 x-axis: gratings, photographs, Heider-Simmel triangles, abstract animation, character animation, live-action film) and brain-topo icons (Fig 4 topography column). + - `/figures:plot-styling` only if any panel needs data plotting; the current 4 figures are conceptual schematics, so it may not be needed. +- **QA**: `/figures:figure-qa` on every panel and on the composed figure. Address all findings before completion. No deferrals. diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/frontmatter.yaml b/manuscript/narrative-review/frontmatter.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e81bd83 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/frontmatter.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +# TiCS Forum Review — frontmatter. +# +# Built by manuscript:manuscript-formatting in v2 Phase 1. +# Matches the skill's "Title page" submission-checklist item. + +title: "Per-shot EEG during naturalistic film: a four-perspective developmental review" +short_title: "Per-shot EEG in development" +article_type: "Forum Review" +target_journal: "Trends in Cognitive Sciences" + +authors: + - name: "Seyed Yahya Shirazi" + affiliation: 1 + email: "shirazi@ieee.org" + orcid: "" # to be filled by author + corresponding: true + +affiliations: + - id: 1 + name: "Open Science Collective" + +keywords: [] # TiCS Forum Reviews do not require keywords; left empty intentionally + +status: "v2 Phase 1 scaffold (manuscript-formatting)" +date: "2026-05-20" + +# Word budget map (TiCS Forum Review) +word_budget: + main_text: 4000 # ceiling + abstract: 120 # ceiling + highlights_chars_per_bullet: 85 + references_target_low: 80 + references_target_high: 120 + figures_min: 3 + figures_max: 5 + +# Compliance flags for Phase 5 verification +compliance: + no_em_dashes: true + no_emojis: true + abbreviations_defined_on_first_use: true + italicise_film_titles: true diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/glossary.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/glossary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a40166f --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/glossary.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ + + +# Glossary + +[Each entry follows the pattern: **Term (acronym if any).** Definition sentence(s), <=50 words.] + +**Event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Inter-subject correlation (ISC).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Log luminance ratio (LLR).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Adaptive mixture independent component analysis (AMICA).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**IC classification (ICLabel).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Mu rhythm.** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Event-related desynchronisation (ERD).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Frontal alpha asymmetry.** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Default-mode network (DMN).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Theory of mind (ToM).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Temporal response function (TRF).** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Baby schema.** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Naturalistic stimulus.** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Event segmentation.** [Definition placeholder.] + +**Temporal receptive window.** [Definition placeholder.] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/highlights.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/highlights.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..86277f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/highlights.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ + + +# Highlights + +- [bullet 1: 1-line claim about the per-shot turn in naturalistic EEG] +- [bullet 2: 1-line claim that four perspectives diverge in their per-shot predictions] +- [bullet 3: 1-line claim about LM-regressor non-transfer to silent stimuli] +- [bullet 4: 1-line claim about the developmental empty-cell] +- [bullet 5: 1-line claim about HBN-EEG R3 as the testbed] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/references.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/references.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7d1849 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/references.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + + +# References + +[Cell Press numbered references go here in Phase 5 final assembly. Format per Cell Press house style (numbered, Vancouver-like). + +Build process: +1. Concatenate per-section files plus boxes plus glossary into a single body text. +2. Extract `[CiteKey]` references in order of first appearance. +3. Map each key to its `refs.bib` entry. +4. Emit a numbered list using Cell Press format. +5. Replace `[CiteKey]` and `[Key1; Key2]` in the body with `[N]` and `[N,M]` respectively. + +The `refs.bib` file (94 entries) is the source of truth.] + +## Note on F2 carry-forward (Schubring vs Codispoti) + +The body cites the alpha-band-and-emotion review under "Codispoti and colleagues (2023), Psychophysiology, DOI 10.1111/psyp.14438". The BibTeX key is `Codispoti2023AlphabandOA`. The internal corpus slug `schubring-schupp-2023-alpha-emotion` is retained inside `research/collection/emotion/` for stable cross-references and does not appear in published prose. diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/refs.bib b/manuscript/narrative-review/refs.bib new file mode 100644 index 0000000..78cfcda --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/refs.bib @@ -0,0 +1,1105 @@ +% refs.bib for the TiCS Forum Review narrative review (v2) +% +% Built by the manuscript:manuscript-formatting skill in v2 Phase 1 +% (per the BibTeX Management section of SKILL.md). +% +% Provenance: concatenation of +% research/collection/psychophysics/psychophysics.bib +% research/collection/action/action.bib +% research/collection/language/language.bib +% research/collection/emotion/emotion.bib +% then deduplicated by @key (97 unique entries before stray removal). +% +% Carry-forwards from the v1 self-review (movie-ersp-direction-review.md): +% - F2 (Schubring/Codispoti DOI 10.1111/psyp.14438): the canonical +% authorship at that DOI is Codispoti, De Cesarei, and Ferrari (2023); +% the BibTeX key is Codispoti2023AlphabandOA. The corpus slug +% `schubring-schupp-2023-alpha-emotion` is retained inside the research +% collection for stable internal cross-references and does not appear +% in published prose. +% - F3 (stray references): three keys removed because they were cited in +% v1 References but not linked to any body cite-card: +% Pessoa2010EmotionPA +% Lerner2011TopographicMO +% Chen2016SharedMR +% +% Final entry count: 94. +% +@Inproceedings{Bell1997TheC, + author = {A. Bell and T. Sejnowski}, + booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems}, + title = {The `independent components''of natural scenes are edge filters}, + year = {1997} +} + + + +@Article{Simoncelli2001NaturalIS, + author = {Eero P. Simoncelli and B. Olshausen}, + booktitle = {Annual Review of Neuroscience}, + journal = {Annual review of neuroscience}, + pages = { + 1193-216 + }, + title = {Natural image statistics and neural representation.}, + volume = {24}, + year = {2001} +} + + + +@Article{Dorr2010VariabilityOE, + author = {M. Dorr and T. Martinetz and K. Gegenfurtner and E. Barth}, + booktitle = {Journal of Vision}, + journal = {Journal of vision}, + pages = { + 28 + }, + title = {Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes.}, + volume = {10 10}, + year = {2010} +} + + + +@Article{Carandini2011NormalizationAA, + author = {M. Carandini and D. Heeger}, + booktitle = {Nature Reviews Neuroscience}, + journal = {Nature Reviews Neuroscience}, + pages = {51-62}, + title = {Normalization as a canonical neural computation}, + volume = {13}, + year = {2011} +} + + + +@Article{Tobimatsu2006StudiesOH, + author = {S. Tobimatsu and G. Celesia}, + booktitle = {Clinical Neurophysiology}, + journal = {Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology}, + pages = { + 1414-33 + }, + title = {Studies of human visual pathophysiology with visual evoked potentials.}, + volume = {117 7}, + year = {2006} +} + + + +@Article{Born2005StructureAF, + author = {R. Born and D. Bradley}, + booktitle = {Annual Review of Neuroscience}, + journal = {Annual review of neuroscience}, + pages = { + 157-89 + }, + title = {Structure and function of visual area MT.}, + volume = {28}, + year = {2005} +} + + + +@Article{Bartels2008NaturalVR, + author = {Andreas Bartels and S. Zeki and N. Logothetis}, + booktitle = {Cerebral Cortex}, + journal = {Cerebral cortex}, + pages = { + 705-17 + }, + title = {Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain.}, + volume = {18 3}, + year = {2008} +} + + + +@Article{Hasson2004IntersubjectSO, + author = {U. Hasson and Y. Nir and I. Levy and Galit Fuhrmann and R. Malach}, + booktitle = {Science}, + journal = {Science}, + pages = {1634 - 1640}, + title = {Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision}, + volume = {303}, + year = {2004} +} + + + +@Article{Nishimoto2011ReconstructingVE, + author = {Shinji Nishimoto and An T. Vu and Thomas Naselaris and Y. Benjamini and Bin Yu and J. Gallant}, + booktitle = {Current Biology}, + journal = {Current biology : CB}, + pages = { + 1641-6 + }, + title = {Reconstructing visual experiences from brain activity evoked by natural movies.}, + volume = {21 19}, + year = {2011} +} + + + +@Article{Adelson1985SpatiotemporalEM, + author = {E. Adelson and J. Bergen}, + booktitle = {Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science}, + journal = {Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science}, + pages = { + 284-99 + }, + title = {Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.}, + volume = {2 2}, + year = {1985} +} + + + +@article{dmochowski2012correlated, + title = {Correlated Components of Ongoing EEG Point to Emotionally Laden Attention – A Possible Marker of Engagement?}, + author = {Dmochowski, Jacek and Sajda, Paul and Dias, João Canossa and Parra, Lucas C.}, + journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, + year = {2012}, + doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2012.00112}, + url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00112} +} + + +@Article{Lalor2010NeuralRT, + author = {E. Lalor and John J. Foxe}, + booktitle = {European Journal of Neuroscience}, + journal = {European Journal of Neuroscience}, + title = {Neural responses to uninterrupted natural speech can be extracted with precise temporal resolution}, + volume = {31}, + year = {2010} +} + + + +@Article{Ki2016AttentionSM, + author = {Jason J. Ki and S. Kelly and L. Parra}, + booktitle = {Journal of Neuroscience}, + journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience}, + pages = {3092 - 3101}, + title = {Attention Strongly Modulates Reliability of Neural Responses to Naturalistic Narrative Stimuli}, + volume = {36}, + year = {2016} +} + + + +@Article{Cohen2016MemorableAN, + author = {Samantha S. Cohen and L. Parra}, + booktitle = {eNeuro}, + journal = {eNeuro}, + title = {Memorable Audiovisual Narratives Synchronize Sensory and Supramodal Neural Responses}, + volume = {3}, + year = {2016} +} + + + +@Article{Madsen2022CognitivePO, + author = {J. Madsen and L. Parra}, + booktitle = {PNAS Nexus}, + journal = {PNAS Nexus}, + title = {Cognitive processing of a common stimulus synchronizes brains, hearts, and eyes}, + volume = {1}, + year = {2022} +} + + + +@Article{Crosse2016TheMT, + author = {Michael J. Crosse and Giovanni M. Di Liberto and A. Bednar and E. Lalor}, + booktitle = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, + journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, + title = {The Multivariate Temporal Response Function (mTRF) Toolbox: A MATLAB Toolbox for Relating Neural Signals to Continuous Stimuli}, + volume = {10}, + year = {2016} +} + + + +@Article{Dmochowski2014AudiencePA, + author = {J. Dmochowski and Matthew A. Bezdek and B. Abelson and John S. Johnson and E. Schumacher and L. Parra}, + booktitle = {Nature Communications}, + journal = {Nature Communications}, + title = {Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing}, + volume = {5}, + year = {2014} +} + + + +@Article{Nentwich2023SemanticNM, + author = {Maximilian Nentwich and M. Leszczyński and Brian E. Russ and Lukas Hirsch and Noah Markowitz and Kaustubh Sapru and C. Schroeder and A. Mehta and S. Bickel and L. Parra}, + booktitle = {bioRxiv}, + journal = {Nature Communications}, + title = {Semantic novelty modulates neural responses to visual change across the human brain}, + volume = {14}, + year = {2023} +} + + + +@Article{Kaneshiro2021InterSubjectEC, + author = {Blair Kaneshiro and Duc T. Nguyen and A. Norcia and J. Dmochowski and J. Berger}, + booktitle = {bioRxiv}, + journal = {bioRxiv}, + title = {Inter-Subject EEG Correlation Reflects Time-Varying Engagement with Natural Music}, + year = {2021} +} + + + +@Article{Dimigen2011CoregistrationOE, + author = {O. Dimigen and W. Sommer and A. Hohlfeld and A. Jacobs and Reinhold Kliegl}, + booktitle = {Journal of experimental psychology. General}, + journal = {Journal of experimental psychology. General}, + pages = { + 552-72 + }, + title = {Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review.}, + volume = {140 4}, + year = {2011} +} + + + +@Article{Plöchl2012CombiningEA, + author = {Michael Plöchl and J. Ossandón and P. König}, + booktitle = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, + journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience}, + title = {Combining EEG and eye tracking: identification, characterization, and correction of eye movement artifacts in electroencephalographic data}, + volume = {6}, + year = {2012} +} + + + +@Article{Dimigen2021RegressionbasedAO, + author = {O. Dimigen and Benedikt V. Ehinger}, + booktitle = {Journal of Vision}, + journal = {Journal of Vision}, + title = {Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications}, + volume = {21}, + year = {2021} +} + + + +@Article{Riesenhuber1999HierarchicalMO, + author = {M. Riesenhuber and T. Poggio}, + booktitle = {Nature Neuroscience}, + journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, + pages = {1019-1025}, + title = {Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex}, + volume = {2}, + year = {1999} +} + + + +@Article{Hubel1962ReceptiveFB, + author = {D. Hubel and T. Wiesel}, + booktitle = {Journal of Physiology}, + journal = {The Journal of Physiology}, + title = {Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex}, + volume = {160}, + year = {1962} +} + + + +@Article{Khaligh-Razavi2014DeepSB, + author = {Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi and N. Kriegeskorte}, + booktitle = {PLoS Comput. Biol.}, + journal = {PLoS Computational Biology}, + title = {Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation}, + volume = {10}, + year = {2014} +} + + + +@article{kmmerer2016deepgaze, + title = {DeepGaze II: Reading fixations from deep features trained on object recognition}, + author = {Kümmerer, Matthias and Wallis, Thomas S. A. and Bethge, Matthias}, + journal = {arXiv (Cornell University)}, + year = {2016}, + doi = {10.48550/arxiv.1610.01563}, + url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1610.01563} +} +% Action strand bibliography for HBN ThePresent boy-shot vs puppy-shot ERSP review +% Phase 2 collection, generated 2026-05-06 + +@article{johansson1973biological, + author = {Johansson, Gunnar}, + title = {Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis}, + journal = {Perception \& Psychophysics}, + volume = {14}, + pages = {201--211}, + year = {1973}, + doi = {10.3758/BF03212378} +} + +@article{saygin2007sts, + author = {Saygin, Ayse Pinar}, + title = {Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception}, + journal = {Brain}, + volume = {130}, + number = {9}, + pages = {2452--2461}, + year = {2007}, + doi = {10.1093/brain/awm162} +} + +@article{klin2009biological, + author = {Klin, Ami and Lin, David J. and Gorrindo, Phillip and Ramsay, Gordon and Jones, Warren}, + title = {Two-year-olds with autism orient to nonsocial contingencies rather than biological motion}, + journal = {Nature}, + volume = {459}, + pages = {257--261}, + year = {2009}, + doi = {10.1038/nature07868} +} + +@article{rizzolatti2004mirror, + author = {Rizzolatti, Giacomo and Craighero, Laila}, + title = {The mirror-neuron system}, + journal = {Annual Review of Neuroscience}, + volume = {27}, + pages = {169--192}, + year = {2004}, + doi = {10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230} +} + +@article{kilner2007predictive, + author = {Kilner, James M. and Friston, Karl J. and Frith, Chris D.}, + title = {Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system}, + journal = {Cognitive Processing}, + volume = {8}, + pages = {159--166}, + year = {2007}, + doi = {10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2} +} + +@article{iacoboni2009mirror, + author = {Iacoboni, Marco}, + title = {Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons}, + journal = {Annual Review of Psychology}, + volume = {60}, + pages = {653--670}, + year = {2009}, + doi = {10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604} +} + +@article{zacks2007event, + author = {Zacks, Jeffrey M. and Speer, Nicole K. and Swallow, Khena M. and Braver, Todd S. and Reynolds, Jeremy R.}, + title = {Event perception: a mind-brain perspective}, + journal = {Psychological Bulletin}, + volume = {133}, + number = {2}, + pages = {273--293}, + year = {2007}, + doi = {10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273} +} + +@article{speer2007narrative, + author = {Speer, Nicole K. and Zacks, Jeffrey M. and Reynolds, Jeremy R.}, + title = {Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries}, + journal = {Psychological Science}, + volume = {18}, + number = {5}, + pages = {449--455}, + year = {2007}, + doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01920.x} +} + +@article{baldassano2017event, + author = {Baldassano, Christopher and Chen, Janice and Zadbood, Asieh and Pillow, Jonathan W. and Hasson, Uri and Norman, Kenneth A.}, + title = {Discovering event structure in continuous narrative perception and memory}, + journal = {Neuron}, + volume = {95}, + number = {3}, + pages = {709--721}, + year = {2017}, + doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.041} +} + +@article{pineda2005mu, + author = {Pineda, Jaime A.}, + title = {The functional significance of mu rhythms: translating ``seeing'' and ``hearing'' into ``doing''}, + journal = {Brain Research Reviews}, + volume = {50}, + number = {1}, + pages = {57--68}, + year = {2005}, + doi = {10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005} +} + +@article{hari1998action, + author = {Hari, Riitta and Forss, Nina and Avikainen, Sari and Kirveskari, Erika and Salenius, Stephan and Rizzolatti, Giacomo}, + title = {Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + volume = {95}, + number = {25}, + pages = {15061--15065}, + year = {1998}, + doi = {10.1073/pnas.95.25.15061} +} + +@article{oberman2007mirror, + author = {Oberman, Lindsay M. and Pineda, Jaime A. and Ramachandran, Vilayanur S.}, + title = {The human mirror neuron system: a link between action observation and social skills}, + journal = {Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience}, + volume = {2}, + number = {1}, + pages = {62--66}, + year = {2007}, + doi = {10.1093/scan/nsl022} +} + +@article{lerner2011temporal, + author = {Lerner, Yulia and Honey, Christopher J. and Silbert, Lauren J. and Hasson, Uri}, + title = {Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story}, + journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}, + volume = {31}, + number = {8}, + pages = {2906--2915}, + year = {2011}, + doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-10.2011} +} + +@article{sliwa2017macaque, + author = {Sliwa, Julia and Freiwald, Winrich A.}, + title = {A dedicated network for social interaction processing in the primate brain}, + journal = {Science}, + volume = {356}, + number = {6339}, + pages = {745--749}, + year = {2017}, + doi = {10.1126/science.aam6383} +} + +@article{chen2017shared, + author = {Chen, Janice and Leong, Yuan Chang and Honey, Christopher J. and Yong, Cindy H. and Norman, Kenneth A. and Hasson, Uri}, + title = {Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals}, + journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, + volume = {20}, + number = {1}, + pages = {115--125}, + year = {2017}, + doi = {10.1038/nn.4450} +} + +@article{castelli2000heider, + author = {Castelli, Fulvia and Happe, Francesca and Frith, Uta and Frith, Chris}, + title = {Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns}, + journal = {NeuroImage}, + volume = {12}, + number = {3}, + pages = {314--325}, + year = {2000}, + doi = {10.1006/nimg.2000.0612} +} + +@article{klin2002visual, + author = {Klin, Ami and Jones, Warren and Schultz, Robert and Volkmar, Fred and Cohen, Donald}, + title = {Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism}, + journal = {Archives of General Psychiatry}, + volume = {59}, + number = {9}, + pages = {809--816}, + year = {2002}, + doi = {10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809} +} + +@article{hasson2010natural, + author = {Hasson, Uri and Malach, Rafael and Heeger, David J.}, + title = {Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation}, + journal = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences}, + volume = {14}, + number = {1}, + pages = {40--48}, + year = {2010}, + doi = {10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.011} +} +% Language strand bibliography +% Generated by Phase 2 collection agent (lit-review-phase2-collection). +% Citation keys preserved as returned by opencite (Semantic Scholar / OpenAlex). + +@Article{Lankinen2014IntersubjectCO, + author = {Kaisu Lankinen and Jukka Saari and R. Hari and M. Koskinen}, + booktitle = {NeuroImage}, + journal = {NeuroImage}, + pages = { + 217-24 + }, + title = {Intersubject consistency of cortical MEG signals during movie viewing}, + volume = {92}, + year = {2014} +} + +@Article{Huth2016NaturalSR, + author = {Alexander G. Huth and Wendy A. de Heer and T. Griffiths and F. Theunissen and J. Gallant}, + booktitle = {Nature}, + journal = {Nature}, + pages = {453 - 458}, + title = {Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex}, + volume = {532}, + year = {2016} +} + +@Article{Nelson2017NeurophysiologicalDO, + author = {M. Nelson and Imen El Karoui and K. Giber and Xiaofang Yang and L. Cohen and H. Koopman and S. Cash and L. Naccache and J. Hale and Christophe Pallier and S. Dehaene}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + pages = {E3669 - E3678}, + title = {Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing}, + volume = {114}, + year = {2017} +} + +@Article{DeLong2005ProbabilisticWP, + author = {Katherine A. DeLong and T. Urbach and M. Kutas}, + booktitle = {Nature Neuroscience}, + journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, + pages = {1117-1121}, + title = {Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity}, + volume = {8}, + year = {2005} +} + +@Article{Kutas2011ThirtyYA, + author = {M. Kutas and Kara D. Federmeier}, + booktitle = {Annual Review of Psychology}, + journal = {Annual review of psychology}, + pages = { + 621-47 + }, + title = {Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).}, + volume = {62}, + year = {2011} +} + +@Article{Heilbron2020AHO, + author = {Micha Heilbron and Kristijan Armeni and J. Schoffelen and P. Hagoort and F. D. de Lange}, + booktitle = {bioRxiv}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + title = {A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension}, + volume = {119}, + year = {2020} +} + +@Article{Caucheteux2022BrainsAA, + author = {Charlotte Caucheteux and J. King}, + booktitle = {Communications Biology}, + journal = {Communications Biology}, + title = {Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing}, + volume = {5}, + year = {2022} +} + +@Article{Goldstein2022SharedCP, + author = {Ariel Goldstein and Zaid Zada and Eliav Buchnik and Mariano Schain and A. Price and Bobbi Aubrey and Samuel A. Nastase and Amir Feder and Dotan Emanuel and Alon Cohen and A. Jansen and H. Gazula and Gina Choe and Aditi Rao and Catherine Kim and Colton Casto and Lora Fanda and W. Doyle and D. Friedman and Patricia Dugan and Lucia Melloni and Roi Reichart and S. Devore and A. Flinker and Liat Hasenfratz and Omer Levy and Avinatan Hassidim and Michael Brenner and Yossi Matias and K. Norman and O. Devinsky and U. Hasson}, + booktitle = {Nature Neuroscience}, + journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, + pages = {369 - 380}, + title = {Shared computational principles for language processing in humans and deep language models}, + volume = {25}, + year = {2022} +} + +@Article{Wassenhove2005VisualSS, + author = {Virginie van Wassenhove and K. W. Grant and D. Poeppel}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + pages = { + 1181-6 + }, + title = {Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.}, + volume = {102 4}, + year = {2005} +} + +@Article{Senkowski2008CrossmodalBT, + author = {D. Senkowski and T. Schneider and John J. Foxe and A. Engel}, + booktitle = {Trends in Neurosciences}, + journal = {Trends in neurosciences}, + pages = { + 401-9 + }, + title = {Crossmodal binding through neural coherence: implications for multisensory processing.}, + volume = {31 8}, + year = {2008} +} + +@Article{Schroeder2009LowfrequencyNO, + author = {C. Schroeder and P. Lakatos}, + booktitle = {Trends in Neurosciences}, + journal = {Trends in neurosciences}, + pages = { + 9-18 + }, + title = {Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection.}, + volume = {32 1}, + year = {2009} +} + +@Article{Magliano2011TheIO, + author = {Joseph P. Magliano and Jeffrey M. Zacks}, + booktitle = {Cognitive Sciences}, + journal = {Cognitive science}, + pages = { + 1489-517 + }, + title = {The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event Segmentation}, + volume = {35 8}, + year = {2011} +} + +@Article{Buckner2008TheBD, + author = {R. Buckner and J. Andrews-Hanna and D. Schacter}, + booktitle = {Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences}, + journal = {Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences}, + title = {The Brain's Default Network}, + volume = {1124}, + year = {2008} +} + +@Article{Simony2016DynamicRO, + author = {E. Simony and C. Honey and Janice Chen and Olga Lositsky and Y. Yeshurun and A. Wiesel and U. Hasson}, + booktitle = {Nature Communications}, + journal = {Nature Communications}, + title = {Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension}, + volume = {7}, + year = {2016} +} + +@Article{Yeshurun2017SameSD, + author = {Y. Yeshurun and Stephen Swanson and E. Simony and Janice Chen and C. Lazaridi and C. Honey and U. Hasson}, + booktitle = {Psychology Science}, + journal = {Psychological Science}, + pages = {307 - 319}, + title = {Same Story, Different Story}, + volume = {28}, + year = {2017} +} + +@Article{Lipkin2022ProbabilisticAF, + author = {Benjamin Lipkin and Greta Tuckute and Josef Affourtit and Hannah Small and Zachary Mineroff and Hope H. Kean and Olessia Jouravlev and L. Rakocevic and Brianna Pritchett and Matthew Siegelman and Caitlyn Hoeflin and Alvince L. Pongos and I. Blank and Melissa Kline Struhl and Anna A. Ivanova and S. Shannon and Aalok Sathe and Malte Hoffmann and Alfonso Nieto-Castanon and E. Fedorenko}, + booktitle = {Scientific Data}, + journal = {Scientific Data}, + title = {Probabilistic atlas for the language network based on precision fMRI data from >800 individuals}, + volume = {9}, + year = {2022} +} + +@Article{Castelli2000MovementAM, + author = {F. Castelli and F. Happé and U. Frith and C. Frith}, + booktitle = {NeuroImage}, + journal = {NeuroImage}, + pages = { + 314-25 + }, + title = {Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns.}, + volume = {12 3}, + year = {2000} +} + +@Article{Castelli2002AutismAS, + author = {F. Castelli and C. Frith and F. Happé and U. Frith}, + booktitle = {Brain : a journal of neurology}, + journal = {Brain : a journal of neurology}, + pages = { + 1839-49 + }, + title = {Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes.}, + volume = {125 Pt 8}, + year = {2002} +} + +@Article{Hanke2014AH7, + author = {Michael Hanke and Florian J. Baumgartner and P. Ibe and F. Kaule and S. Pollmann and O. Speck and W. Zinke and J. Stadler}, + booktitle = {Scientific Data}, + journal = {Scientific Data}, + title = {A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie}, + volume = {1}, + year = {2014} +} + +@Article{Naci2014ACN, + author = {Lorina Naci and R. Cusack and Mimma Anello and A. Owen}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + pages = {14277 - 14282}, + title = {A common neural code for similar conscious experiences in different individuals}, + volume = {111}, + year = {2014} +} + +@Article{Vanderwal2015InscapesAM, + author = {Tamara Vanderwal and C. Kelly and J. Eilbott and L. Mayes and F. Castellanos}, + booktitle = {NeuroImage}, + journal = {NeuroImage}, + pages = { + 222-32 + }, + title = {Inscapes: A movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging}, + volume = {122}, + year = {2015} +} + +@Article{Ben-Yakov2018TheHF, + author = {A. Ben-Yakov and R. Henson}, + booktitle = {Journal of Neuroscience}, + journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience}, + pages = {10057 - 10068}, + title = {The Hippocampal Film Editor: Sensitivity and Specificity to Event Boundaries in Continuous Experience}, + volume = {38}, + year = {2018} +} + +@article{toneva2019interpreting, + title = {Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)}, + author = {Toneva, Mariya and Wehbe, Leila}, + journal = {arXiv (Cornell University)}, + year = {2019}, + doi = {10.48550/arxiv.1905.11833}, + url = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1905.11833} +} + +@article{schrimpf2021the, + title = {The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing}, + author = {Schrimpf, Martin and Blank, Idan and Tuckute, Greta and Kauf, Carina and Hosseini, Eghbal A. and Kanwisher, Nancy and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. and Fedorenko, Evelina}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + year = {2021}, + doi = {10.1073/pnas.2105646118}, + url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105646118} +} + +@Article{Antonello2023ScalingLF, + author = {Richard J. Antonello and Aditya R. Vaidya and Alexander G. Huth}, + booktitle = {Neural Information Processing Systems}, + journal = {Advances in neural information processing systems}, + pages = { + 21895-21907 + }, + title = {Scaling laws for language encoding models in fMRI}, + volume = {36}, + year = {2023} +} + +@Article{Caucheteux2023EvidenceOA, + author = {Charlotte Caucheteux and Alexandre Gramfort and J. King}, + booktitle = {Nature Human Behaviour}, + journal = {Nature Human Behaviour}, + pages = {430 - 441}, + title = {Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech}, + volume = {7}, + year = {2023} +} + + +@Article{Saarimäki2016DiscreteNS, + author = {Heini Saarimäki and Athanasios Gotsopoulos and I. Jääskeläinen and J. Lampinen and Patrik Vuilleumier and R. Hari and M. Sams and L. Nummenmaa}, + booktitle = {Cerebral Cortex}, + journal = {Cerebral cortex}, + pages = { + 2563-2573 + }, + title = {Discrete Neural Signatures of Basic Emotions.}, + volume = {26 6}, + year = {2016} +} + + + +@Article{Nummenmaa2012EmotionsPS, + author = {L. Nummenmaa and E. Glerean and M. Viinikainen and I. Jääskeläinen and R. Hari and M. Sams}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + pages = {9599 - 9604}, + title = {Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals}, + volume = {109}, + year = {2012} +} + + + +@Article{Kragel2018EmotionSA, + author = {P. Kragel and Marianne C. Reddan and K. LaBar and T. Wager}, + booktitle = {Science Advances}, + journal = {Science Advances}, + title = {Emotion schemas are embedded in the human visual system}, + volume = {5}, + year = {2018} +} + + + +@Article{Cowen2017SelfreportC2, + author = {Alan S. Cowen and D. Keltner}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + pages = {E7900 - E7909}, + title = {Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients}, + volume = {114}, + year = {2017} +} + + + +@Article{Saxe2003PeopleTA, + author = {R. Saxe and Nancy Kanwisher and Nancy Kanwisher}, + booktitle = {NeuroImage}, + journal = {NeuroImage}, + pages = { + 1835-42 + }, + title = {People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in "theory of mind".}, + volume = {19 4}, + year = {2003} +} + + + +@Article{Richardson2018DevelopmentOT, + author = {H. Richardson and Grace Lisandrelli and Alexa Riobueno-Naylor and R. Saxe}, + booktitle = {Nature Communications}, + journal = {Nature Communications}, + title = {Development of the social brain from age three to twelve years}, + volume = {9}, + year = {2018} +} + + + +@Article{Lindquist2012TheBB, + author = {Kristen A. Lindquist and T. Wager and H. Kober and E. Bliss-Moreau and L. F. Barrett}, + booktitle = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences}, + journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences}, + pages = {121 - 143}, + title = {The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review}, + volume = {35}, + year = {2012} +} + + + +@Article{Sergerie2008TheRO, + author = {Karine Sergerie and C. Chochol and J. Armony}, + booktitle = {Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews}, + journal = {Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews}, + pages = { + 811-30 + }, + title = {The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.}, + volume = {32 4}, + year = {2008} +} + + + +@Article{Etkin2011EmotionalPI, + author = {A. Etkin and T. Egner and R. Kalisch}, + booktitle = {Trends in Cognitive Sciences}, + journal = {Trends in cognitive sciences}, + pages = { + 85-93 + }, + title = {Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex.}, + volume = {15 2}, + year = {2011} +} + + + +@Article{Wager2013AnFN, + author = {T. Wager and L. Atlas and M. Lindquist and M. Roy and Choong-Wan Woo and E. Kross}, + booktitle = {New England Journal of Medicine}, + journal = {The New England journal of medicine}, + pages = { + 1388-97 + }, + title = {An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain.}, + volume = {368 15}, + year = {2013} +} + + + +@Article{Petroni2018TheVO, + author = {A. Petroni and Samantha S. Cohen and Lei Ai and N. Langer and S. Henin and T. Vanderwal and M. Milham and L. Parra}, + booktitle = {eNeuro}, + journal = {eNeuro}, + title = {The Variability of Neural Responses to Naturalistic Videos Change with Age and Sex}, + volume = {5}, + year = {2018} +} + + + +@Article{Schmälzle2020TheCB, + author = {Ralf Schmälzle and Clare Grall}, + booktitle = {J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.}, + journal = {J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl.}, + title = {The Coupled Brains of Captivated Audiences}, + volume = {32}, + year = {2020} +} + + + +@Article{Kauttonen2015OptimizingMF, + author = {Janne Kauttonen and Yevhen Hlushchuk and Pia Tikka}, + booktitle = {NeuroImage}, + journal = {NeuroImage}, + pages = { + 136-48 + }, + title = {Optimizing methods for linking cinematic features to fMRI data}, + volume = {110}, + year = {2015} +} + + + +@Article{Stoeckel2014PatternsOB, + author = {L. Stoeckel and Lori S Palley and R. Gollub and Steven M. Niemi and A. E. Evins}, + booktitle = {PLoS ONE}, + journal = {PLoS ONE}, + title = {Patterns of Brain Activation when Mothers View Their Own Child and Dog: An fMRI Study}, + volume = {9}, + year = {2014} +} + + + +@Article{Glocker2009BabySM, + author = {Melanie L Glocker and D. Langleben and K. Ruparel and J. Loughead and J. Valdez and M. Griffin and N. Sachser and R. Gur}, + booktitle = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}, + journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, + pages = {9115 - 9119}, + title = {Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women}, + volume = {106}, + year = {2009} +} + + + +@Article{Borgi2014BabySI, + author = {M. Borgi and Irene Cogliati-Dezza and Victoria L. Brelsford and K. Meints and F. Cirulli}, + booktitle = {Frontiers in Psychology}, + journal = {Frontiers in Psychology}, + title = {Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children}, + volume = {5}, + year = {2014} +} + + + +@Article{Davidson2000AffectiveSP, + author = {R. Davidson}, + booktitle = {American Psychologist}, + journal = {The American psychologist}, + pages = { + 1196-214 + }, + title = {Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: brain mechanisms and plasticity.}, + volume = {55 11}, + year = {2000} +} + + + +@Article{Coan2004FrontalEA, + author = {J. Coan and John J. B. Allen}, + booktitle = {Biological Psychology}, + journal = {Biological psychology}, + pages = { + 7-49 + }, + title = {Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator and mediator of emotion.}, + volume = {67 1-2}, + year = {2004} +} + + + +@Article{Reznik2018FrontalAA, + author = {S. J. Reznik and John J. B. Allen}, + booktitle = {Psychophysiology}, + journal = {Psychophysiology}, + title = {Frontal asymmetry as a mediator and moderator of emotion: An updated review.}, + volume = {55 1}, + year = {2018} +} + + + +@Article{Codispoti2023AlphabandOA, + author = {Maurizio Codispoti and Andrea De Cesarei and V. Ferrari}, + booktitle = {Psychophysiology}, + journal = {Psychophysiology}, + pages = { + e14438 + }, + title = {Alpha-band oscillations and emotion: A review of studies on picture perception.}, + year = {2023} +} + + + +@Article{Mar2011TheNB, + author = {R. Mar}, + booktitle = {Annual Review of Psychology}, + journal = {Annual review of psychology}, + pages = { + 103-34 + }, + title = {The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension.}, + volume = {62}, + year = {2011} +} + + + +@Article{Tamir2016ReadingFA, + author = {D. Tamir and A. Bricker and D. Dodell-Feder and Jason P. Mitchell}, + booktitle = {Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience}, + journal = {Social cognitive and affective neuroscience}, + pages = { + 215-24 + }, + title = {Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network.}, + volume = {11 2}, + year = {2016} +} + + + +@Article{Singer2004EmpathyFP, + author = {T. Singer and B. Seymour and J. O’Doherty and H. Kaube and R. Dolan and C. Frith}, + booktitle = {Science}, + journal = {Science}, + pages = {1157 - 1162}, + title = {Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain}, + volume = {303}, + year = {2004} +} + + + +@Article{Zaki2012TheNO, + author = {Jamil Zaki and K. Ochsner}, + booktitle = {Nature Neuroscience}, + journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, + pages = {675-680}, + title = {The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise}, + volume = {15}, + year = {2012} +} diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/01_introduction.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/01_introduction.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b3f317 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/01_introduction.md @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ + + +# 1. Introduction: the per-shot turn + +[Opening paragraph (~150 words): two-wave history of naturalistic-stimulus neuroscience. +- Wave 1, functional: Hasson et al. 2004 fMRI ISC (45% of cortex synchronises during free viewing). +- Wave 2, electrophysiological: Dmochowski et al. 2012 EEG correlated-component analysis; Ki et al. 2016 attention modulation; Cohen and Parra 2016; Dmochowski et al. 2014; Madsen and Parra 2022. +- Wave 3 (emerging): per-shot / per-event interrogation. Nentwich et al. 2023 whole-brain shot-cut iEEG; Ben-Yakov and Henson 2018 hippocampal cut-vs-boundary; event-segmentation theory: Zacks et al. 2007, Speer et al. 2007, Baldassano et al. 2017.] + +[Paragraph 2 (~100 words): developmental tradition. +- Richardson et al. 2018 pediatric ToM/pain via Pixar shorts; Vanderwal et al. 2015 Inscapes for MRI compliance; Petroni et al. 2018 EEG-ISC across ages 6-44. +- Conclude: none have reported per-shot ERSP at the 0 to 500 ms post-onset window in a child cohort viewing animation.] + +[Paragraph 3 (~150 words): four-perspective thesis and roadmap. +- Four perspectives (psychophysics, action, language, emotion) make divergent and partly-falsifiable predictions about this empty cell. +- One-sentence methods footprint: LLR partialling; ICA-only artifact rejection (no synchronous eye tracker in HBN-EEG R3). +- Section roadmap: Sections 2-6 develop the perspectives; Section 7 synthesises into a pre-registerable rejection region; Box 1 names the anchor cohort.] + +[Final transition sentence: explicit bridge into Section 2's four-perspective scaffold. (Per I4 carry-forward.)] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/02_scaffold.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/02_scaffold.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b68440d --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/02_scaffold.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ + + +# 2. The four-perspective scaffold + +[Paragraph 1 (~200 words): defend the four-perspective scaffold as structural rather than decorative. Each perspective makes a different *kind* of prediction: +- Psychophysics: a regressor of no interest that must be partialled before any social claim can be defended (LLR; motion energy). +- Action: a band-and-topography prediction (mu-band ERD over central rolandic cortex) inherited from adult mirror-system work but never tested in animated agents. +- Language: a method that structurally cannot transfer (LM surprisal aligned to spoken transcripts) plus a positive silent-narrative sub-thread (Castelli, Vanderwal, Naci, Lankinen). +- Emotion: two predictions at incompatible latencies (early occipital alpha; later frontal-asymmetric alpha). +Together the four form a hierarchy of prior-evidence depth that the data can rerank.] + +[Paragraph 2 (~250 words): perspective-to-theme mapping (per I4 carry-forward: argumentative, not catalogue). Use the 15 corpus themes from `research/synthesis/science-map.md`. Group themes by which perspective owns them, not by theme number. +- Two cross-perspective backbones: Theme 1 (ISC as reliability metric) and Theme 2 (event segmentation). These anchor every per-shot analysis. +- Psychophysics-owned: Themes 4 (low-level feature regressors), 5 (time-resolved EEG/MEG), 11 (free-viewing EEG with eye coregistration). +- Action-owned: Themes 6 (mu rhythm and action observation), 8 (social cognition through biological motion), with contributions to Themes 2 and 14 (distributed multivariate signatures). +- Language-owned: Theme 9 (LMs as regressors) and Theme 10 (audiovisual integration); silent-narrative sub-thread cuts across Themes 8 and 13 (developmental neuroimaging in cinematic paradigms). +- Emotion-owned: Themes 7 (affective dynamics), 12 (pet/animal/baby-schema), 13. +- Theme 15 (predictive processing) is a cross-perspective unifier. +Forward-reference Figures 1 and 4.] + +[Paragraph 3 (~150 words): perspective interaction is intentional, not residual. Briefly preview the synthesis in Section 7 (where the four rejection regions combine into a pre-registerable test). Explicit transition to Section 3.] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/03_psychophysics.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/03_psychophysics.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..64fe565 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/03_psychophysics.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ + + +# 3. Psychophysics: the bottom-up floor + +[Paragraph 1 (~150 words): lineage of bottom-up visual feature processing. +- V1 receptive fields (Hubel and Wiesel 1962). +- Divisive normalisation (Carandini and Heeger 2011). +- Natural-image statistics + spatiotemporal energy (Bell and Sejnowski 1997; Simoncelli and Olshausen 2001; Adelson and Bergen 1985). +- MT/MST motion machinery (Born and Bradley 2005; Bartels and Zeki 2008). +- Nishimoto et al. 2011: movie reconstruction from BOLD via Adelson-Bergen feature bank (existence proof for motion-energy reconstructability). +- Clinical VEP (Tobimatsu and Celesia 2006): luminance/contrast steps produce reliable scalp signatures with magno/parvo pathway assignment.] + +[Paragraph 2 (~150 words): closest electrophysiological analogue. +- Nentwich et al. 2023 iEEG: triple-regressor (motion, saccades, cuts) shows motion outranks luminance for occipitoparietal cortex. +- Per-shot LLR is one of several low-level features that needs accounting; LLR is the minimum partialling for any social claim. +- Whole-clip EEG ISC tracks low-level features at occipital electrodes more strongly than higher-order content (Dmochowski et al. 2012; Madsen and Parra 2022; Cohen and Parra 2016). Attention modulates this baseline (Ki et al. 2016). +- Envelope-only auditory control (Kaneshiro et al. 2021) is the methodological template the LLR-as-covariate plan inherits.] + +[Paragraph 3 (~200 words): eye-movement caveat. +- Free-viewing EEG depends on eye-movement coregistration to separate stimulus-onset from saccade-locked and fixation-related potentials (Dimigen et al. 2011; Plöchl et al. 2012). Regression deconvolution is the state of the art (Dimigen and Ehinger 2021). +- Gaze coherence varies with stimulus class: highest on Hollywood trailers, lowest on natural movie clips and static images (Dorr et al. 2010); a Pixar short sits between these extremes. +- HBN-EEG R3 has no synchronous eye tracker. Per-shot ERSP cannot deconvolve overlapping saccade-locked transients from shot-onset responses. +- ICA-based artifact rejection through AMICA and ICLabel is the operating compromise (Bell and Sejnowski 1997 for ICA foundation). +- Motion energy computed offline from the stimulus video is the named first follow-up regressor (Nishimoto et al. 2011; Nentwich et al. 2023). +- mTRF toolbox (Crosse et al. 2016) supplies the production regression framework. +- Forward-reference Figure 2 (naturalness gradient).] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/04_action.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/04_action.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..86e071c --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/04_action.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ + + +# 4. Action: mu-band ERD and event segmentation + +[Paragraph 1 (~150 words): mu-band lineage. +- Hari et al. 1998 MEG: primary motor cortex activated during passive observation of hand action via 15-25 Hz rolandic rebound suppression (31-46% of execution-related suppression). +- Pineda 2005: EEG mu rhythm (8-13 Hz over C3, Cz, C4) as non-invasive proxy for human mirror-system engagement. +- Oberman et al. 2007: mu suppression magnitude correlates with self-reported social skill. +- Saygin 2007: lesion-symptom mapping places posterior STS and ventral premotor cortex as causally necessary nodes for biological-motion perception. Johansson 1973 (biological motion). +- Predictive-coding reformulations: Kilner et al. 2007; Rizzolatti and Craighero 2004; Iacoboni 2009. +- **I3 carry-forward**: Hickok-style critiques of one-to-one mirror-system interpretations of mu suppression are not represented in the corpus and temper the weight that the action-perspective prediction can carry.] + +[Paragraph 2 (~100 words): animated-agent extrapolation. +- Heider-Simmel triangle animations (Castelli et al. 2000): even abstract triangles recruit posterior STS, mPFC, and temporal poles when motion implies intention. +- Naturalness gradient (Hasson et al. 2010) places character animation between abstract Heider-Simmel and live-action. +- The inferential bridge from triangle-animation fMRI activation to character-animation mu-band EEG ERD is plausible and untested. +- Shots dominated by character action should produce ERD in the mu band over central electrodes, with possible beta-band rebound suppression.] + +[Paragraph 3 (~150 words): event segmentation as second action beat. +- Speer et al. 2007: posterior cingulate, MT+, posterior STS boundary-locked transients in fMRI. +- Baldassano et al. 2017: HMM recovers hierarchy of event boundaries from Sherlock fMRI; hippocampal boundary signals predict subsequent free recall. +- Lerner et al. 2011: temporal receptive windows from sensory cortex (ms) to default-mode (tens of s). +- Chen et al. 2017: event-specific DMN patterns shared across viewers and reactivated at recall. +- Ben-Yakov and Henson 2018: hippocampus distinguishes within-event camera cuts (minimal response) from across-event narrative boundaries (robust response). +- Magliano and Zacks 2011: behavioural foundation for shot-segmentation independent of dialogue.] + +[Paragraph 4 (~100 words): single-agent vs two-agent contrast. +- Sliwa and Freiwald 2017: dedicated cortical network in macaque for two-agent social interaction, separable from single-agent action perception. +- This motivates excluding two-agent shots from a clean single-agent contrast (the social-interaction network may dominate two-agent variance). +- Note that autism subsample considerations (Klin et al. 2002, 2009) move to Section 7 limitations (per v1 m8 carry-forward to keep Section 4 focused).] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/05_language.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/05_language.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e18788a --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/05_language.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ + + +# 5. Language: comparator of non-transfer plus silent-narrative sub-thread + +## 5a. Language-model regressors are structurally non-transferable + +[Budget: ~250 words. + +Paragraph (~250 words): LM-as-regressor mainstream and its dependence on word alignment. +- Goldstein et al. 2022: pre-onset prediction, post-onset surprise, and contextual-embedding signatures shared between word-by-word electrocorticography (ECoG) and autoregressive LMs. +- Heilbron et al. 2022: lexical/syntactic/semantic surprisal regressors during MEG audiobook listening, derived from LMs with word-onset alignment. +- Caucheteux et al. 2022, 2023: transformer intermediate layers map to fMRI/MEG; cortical hierarchy of prediction timescales. +- Antonello et al. 2023: log-linear scaling of brain-prediction with LM parameter count up to 30B. +- Schrimpf et al. 2021: next-word-prediction quality drives brain-score on fMRI/ECoG/reading-time benchmarks. +- Toneva and Wehbe 2019: BERT predicts reading fMRI/MEG. +- Huth et al. 2016: voxelwise semantic atlas requires spoken transcripts. +- Nelson et al. 2017: phrase-structure-building intracranial high-gamma, explicitly reading-based. +- N400 family (Kutas and Federmeier 2011; DeLong et al. 2005): bridges to picture-context paradigms at the cost of dynamic stimulus. + +Closing sentence applies F1 carry-forward verbatim: +"All seven Category G language-ontology cards (and 12 cards corpus-wide) carry `transfer-to-silent: no`." + +Lipkin et al. 2022 frontotemporal language network atlas: included as negative-control region in the falsification region of Section 7.] + +## 5b. Silent-narrative neural correlates that do transfer + +[Budget: ~350 words. + +Paragraph 1 (~200 words): thesis statement + Heider-Simmel/Inscapes/Hitchcock/MEG. +- Open with a thesis sentence parallel to 5a: silent-narrative neural correlates do transfer to scalp-EEG ERSP analysis even when LM regressors cannot. (Per v1 m5 carry-forward.) +- Castelli et al. 2000 (animations mentalising; Heider-Simmel triangles): silent geometric-shape animations engage mPFC, TPJ, STS when motion implies social interaction. +- Castelli et al. 2002: same paradigm in autism shows reduced engagement. +- Vanderwal et al. 2015 Inscapes: purpose-built silent abstract animation improves MRI compliance and produces reliable network-level activity; used by HBN itself. +- Naci et al. 2014: Hitchcock excerpt as covert assessment. +- Lankinen et al. 2014: source-space MEG reliable across viewers in occipital and temporal cortex during silent-visual and audiovisual movie conditions. Closest electrophysiological analogue with a deliberate silent-visual condition. +- Studyforrest (Hanke et al. 2014): audio-only foundation extended to silent-cohort contrasts.] + +[Paragraph 2 (~150 words): cross-modal phase alignment + DMN as narrative integrator. +- Schroeder et al. 2009: modality-general delta- and theta-band phase alignment to attended event onsets; mechanistic frame for shot-onset ERSP independent of speech. +- Senkowski et al. 2008: cross-modal gamma synchronisation and low-frequency phase coupling. +- Van Wassenhove et al. 2005: visual-speech facilitation. Does not transfer because *The Present* has no dialogue. +- DMN as narrative integrator: Buckner et al. 2008; Simony et al. 2016; Yeshurun et al. 2017; Mar 2011; Tamir et al. 2016. + +Closing transition: silent narrative engages mPFC, TPJ, STS, DMN. Their IC-cluster analogues in EEG are the search regions for the per-shot ERSP analysis. Forward-reference Figure 3 (gap matrix).] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/06_emotion.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/06_emotion.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..851f234 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/06_emotion.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ + + +# 6. Emotion: two predictions at different latencies + +[Paragraph 1 (~150 words): early visual-cortex emotion-schema response. +- Kragel et al. 2018 EmoNet: emotion schemas encoded in early visual cortex. +- Saarimaki et al. 2016: fMRI MVPA decoding of six basic emotions. +- Cowen and Keltner 2017: 27-emotion taxonomy from short videos. +- Lindquist et al. 2012: distributed signatures over strict regional localisation. +- Wager et al. 2013 neurologic pain signature (NPS): multivariate signatures of affect. +- Closest EEG correlate at the 0-500 ms scale: early occipital alpha desynchronisation (80-300 ms post-shot-onset, extrapolated from static-picture latencies). +- **F2 carry-forward**: Codispoti, De Cesarei, and Ferrari (2023; Psychophysiology DOI 10.1111/psyp.14438) review alpha-band oscillations during emotional picture perception, concluding alpha desynchronisation is a robust correlate of attentional engagement with parametric arousal modulation. Cite as "Codispoti and colleagues (2023)" in prose. +- Whether this transfers to dynamic naturalistic stimuli at sub-second timescales in a child cohort is untested.] + +[Paragraph 2 (~150 words): cuteness / affiliative response (longer latency). +- Stoeckel et al. 2014: adult mothers viewing own child versus own dog photos. Common activation across emotion, reward, affiliation, visual processing, and social cognition regions. +- Glocker et al. 2009: baby-schema parametric modulation of NAcc reward in nulliparous adults. +- Borgi et al. 2014: children 3-6 show parametric cuteness ratings and gaze bias for human infant, puppy, and kitten faces. +- Interpretation: Stoeckel measures identity-level pair-bonding; Borgi measures generic baby-schema. HBN viewers have no identity-level bond with an animated puppy; the inference is from generic baby-schema rather than pair-bonding circuitry.] + +[Paragraph 3 (~150 words): EEG routes (alpha desynchronisation + frontal asymmetry). +- Alpha-band desynchronisation as arousal-modulated correlate of attentional engagement (Codispoti et al. 2023). +- Frontal alpha asymmetry as approach-withdrawal index (Davidson 2000; Coan and Allen 2004). +- Reznik and Allen 2018: meta-analytic critique documents smaller effect sizes and reliability concerns. +- Corpus contains no card applying asymmetry analysis to per-event sub-second windows during continuous naturalistic stimulus, and none in developmental cohort viewing film. +- Frontal asymmetry at shot-onset latency: exploratory rather than confirmatory.] + +[Paragraph 4 (~50 words): social cognition / DMN engagement. +- Richardson et al. 2018: ToM and pain networks from age three using Pixar shorts in 122 children. Load-bearing developmental anchor. +- Brief: Saxe and Kanwisher 2003 (TPJ); Mar 2011; Singer et al. 2004; Zaki and Ochsner 2012; Nummenmaa et al. 2012; Schmaelzle and Grall 2020; Kauttonen et al. 2015. +- Closing sentence: two predictions sit at incompatible latencies and topographies; an LLR-partialled per-shot GLM adjudicates between them.] diff --git a/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/07_synthesis.md b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/07_synthesis.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9228815 --- /dev/null +++ b/manuscript/narrative-review/sections/07_synthesis.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ + + +# 7. Synthesis: integration, falsifiability, and open questions + +## 7.1 Integration + +[Budget: ~100 words. +- Restate the four-perspective ranking by depth of prior evidence. +- Psychophysics: deepest precedent, simplest operationalisation (partial LLR, optionally motion energy, before any condition claim). +- Action: deepest specific oscillatory prediction (mu-band ERD over central rolandic clusters), no animated-agent precedent in EEG. +- Language: structurally non-transferable for LM regressors but supplies cortical priors via the 5b sub-thread (mPFC, TPJ, STS, DMN). +- Emotion: two predictions (early occipital alpha; later frontal-asymmetric alpha) with cuteness anchored developmentally by Borgi 2014. +- Forward-reference Figure 4 (predictions table).] + +## 7.2 Anchor case (F4 carry-forward) + +[Budget: ~100 words. +- External precedent: Petroni et al. 2018 recorded 64-channel EEG at 500 Hz from 114 viewers across ages 6-44 during passive viewing of six naturalistic videos including animated and live-action shorts. They did not analyse shot-onset ERSP, but they demonstrated scalp-EEG signal exists during developmental naturalistic viewing. +- Internal feasibility: a partly-validated developmental EEG pipeline on HBN-EEG R3 brings 184 subjects through BIDS import, 1 Hz HPF, conditional cleanline, channel rejection, AMICA, ICLabel, dipfit5, std_precomp ERSP. 100 Hz local working set; 500 Hz S3 validation pass scheduled after pipeline validation. +- The two anchor assertions are independent and not interchangeable.] + +## 7.3 Falsifiability (F5 carry-forward) + +[Budget: ~150 words. +- Pre-registerable topographic-and-band rejection region: + - Surviving central-rolandic mu-band cluster (electrodes C3, Cz, C4; 8-13 Hz) confirms action. + - Surviving frontal-asymmetric alpha cluster (electrodes F3, F4; 8-13 Hz) confirms emotion. + - Surviving cluster in left frontotemporal IC space, overlapping the Lipkin et al. 2022 language-network atlas used as negative-control mask, falsifies the four-perspective ranking. + - Null result on LLR-partialled GLM at pre-registered cluster-level alpha (p < 0.05 corrected by mass-univariate cluster-based permutation; mTRF toolbox precedent: Crosse et al. 2016) falsifies by bottom-up exhaustion. +- Pinning the rejection region before data analysis constrains analyst degrees of freedom.] + +## 7.4 Open questions and limitations (I1 + I2 carry-forward) + +[Budget: ~100 words. +- I2: narrative-position objection. Boy-only and puppy-only shots differ on three-act position (boy-only in early-act setup, puppy-only in late-act resolution). Add shot-index-in-narrative as continuous covariate; fit within-act stratified analysis as named follow-up (Magliano 2011; Baldassano 2017; Chen 2017). +- Hickok-style mu-system critique gap (I3 carry-forward repeated here). +- Klin et al. 2002, 2009 autism subsample considerations (moved from Section 4 per v1 m8 carry-forward). +- Emotion literature predominantly adult; three pet-evoked affective cards are fMRI/behavioural. +- Frontal asymmetry at sub-second timescales is unprecedented and reliability-limited. +- 100 Hz local working set caps beta/gamma claims until 500 Hz pass. +- Outstanding Questions Box collects forward-looking adjudication targets.]