Hi Author,
Thanks for the great work on building the RoboMemArena benchmark. We have several questions on the training data.
-
We find some subtasks do not have order in the name. How to decide its ordering in this case?
For example, under multi-occlusion 4_drawer_butter_dataset, "put_butter_into_drawer_have_object_seed100_task4.hdf5" does not have a subtask order in its naming. Which order does it belong to?
-
We find subtask orders is not unique for different subtask. Could you help to update the subtask ordering?
For example, under multi-occlusion 4_drawer_butter_dataset, "close_top_drawer_final_4_seed100_task4.hdf5" and "open_bottom_drawer_4_seed100_task4.hdf5" share the same subtask order.
-
Do you train on all provided data or any filterings on failed demonstrations before training? If later case, would you mind sharing the data filtering script?
We find some failed subtasks in the demonstration, for example, under multi-occlusion 5_butter_middle_drawer_dataset, "open_bottom_drawer_4_seed101_task5" doesn't successfully open the drawer.
-
We find some mismatches in the subtask description and robot demonstration. Would you have any data cleaning scripts for this scenario?
For example, under multi-occlusion 5_butter_middle_drawer_dataset, "open_middle_drawer_again_5_seed101_task5" supposes to open the middle drawer, but it actually opens the bottom drawer.
Thank you so much for your effort! Look forward to hearing back!
Hi Author,
Thanks for the great work on building the RoboMemArena benchmark. We have several questions on the training data.
We find some subtasks do not have order in the name. How to decide its ordering in this case?
For example, under multi-occlusion 4_drawer_butter_dataset, "put_butter_into_drawer_have_object_seed100_task4.hdf5" does not have a subtask order in its naming. Which order does it belong to?
We find subtask orders is not unique for different subtask. Could you help to update the subtask ordering?
For example, under multi-occlusion 4_drawer_butter_dataset, "close_top_drawer_final_4_seed100_task4.hdf5" and "open_bottom_drawer_4_seed100_task4.hdf5" share the same subtask order.
Do you train on all provided data or any filterings on failed demonstrations before training? If later case, would you mind sharing the data filtering script?
We find some failed subtasks in the demonstration, for example, under multi-occlusion 5_butter_middle_drawer_dataset, "open_bottom_drawer_4_seed101_task5" doesn't successfully open the drawer.
We find some mismatches in the subtask description and robot demonstration. Would you have any data cleaning scripts for this scenario?
For example, under multi-occlusion 5_butter_middle_drawer_dataset, "open_middle_drawer_again_5_seed101_task5" supposes to open the middle drawer, but it actually opens the bottom drawer.
Thank you so much for your effort! Look forward to hearing back!