diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md
index 18a3a9f..a410a54 100644
--- a/NEWS.md
+++ b/NEWS.md
@@ -52,9 +52,13 @@ schema and every handoff are unchanged.
   `nomo_run()` rather than `h$items`, and links to the section of the
   nomologR guided workflow that continues from content review. Two stale
   sentences are corrected. The handoff reader in nomologR, which the vignette
-  called future work, has shipped. And nomologR starts from the same handoff
-  but simulates its own responses, so its screening numbers differ from
-  these.
+  called future work, has shipped. And the nomologR guided workflow starts
+  from the same handoff but simulates its own responses, so its screening
+  numbers differ from these.
+* The walkthrough links to the companion article in nomologR, "From content
+  review to empirical screening", which continues it on the same responses.
+  nomologR ships the item and response files of the walkthrough unchanged,
+  with the script that generates them.
 
 # contentvalidR 0.9.0
 
diff --git a/vignettes/one-item-set-both-stages.Rmd b/vignettes/one-item-set-both-stages.Rmd
index 9bb4753..d3ae75d 100644
--- a/vignettes/one-item-set-both-stages.Rmd
+++ b/vignettes/one-item-set-both-stages.Rmd
@@ -303,10 +303,13 @@ screened <- nomo_screen(responses, items = h)
 run <- nomo_run(responses, scales = h)
 ```
 
-`nomologR`'s guided workflow continues from here, in its section
-[Starting from content review](https://juhalt.github.io/nomologR/articles/guided-workflow.html#starting-from-content-review):
-screening, the measurement model, and a report that opens with the content
-review.
+`nomologR`'s article
+[From content review to empirical screening](https://juhalt.github.io/nomologR/articles/content-review.html)
+continues this walkthrough on the same responses. It runs the empirical stage
+with `nomologR`'s own tools, from the raw screen and the recode through the
+factor models to invariance across the two cohorts. Its guided workflow
+shows the same calls on a handoff, in the section
+[Starting from content review](https://juhalt.github.io/nomologR/articles/guided-workflow.html#starting-from-content-review).
 
 ## The moral, stated plainly
 
@@ -335,10 +338,11 @@ Every file used here is generated by `data-raw/build-walkthrough-data.R` in the
 package sources, which uses only base R and is deterministic. It states the
 full generating model: the two-factor structure, every loading, the factor
 correlation, the response thresholds, and the single cohort shift.
-`nomologR`'s guided workflow starts from the same handoff, which it ships as a
-file, so the items, decisions, and keying match between the two packages. Its
-responses are simulated separately, so its screening numbers are not the ones
-shown here.
+`nomologR` ships the item and response files unchanged, as
+`nomo_demo_walkthrough_items` and `nomo_demo_walkthrough`, together with this
+script, and its companion article reads them. Its guided workflow starts from
+the same handoff but simulates its own responses, so the screening numbers
+there are not the ones shown here.
 
 ## References