diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..30240d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Nothing here is a gate.
+#
+# The templates beside this file are prompts for a person. Keeping the blank issue
+# available is what makes the first line of each of them true: a form nobody can
+# walk past is enforcement whatever it says about itself, and somebody with
+# something to report that fits neither template should not be turned away by a
+# heading.
+#
+# No contact links. A link here publishes a route to a person, and which address
+# this repository publishes, for a vulnerability or for anything else, is entry 5
+# of #1 and is not decided.
+blank_issues_enabled: true
diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/decision.md b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/decision.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7de486c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/decision.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+name: Something here has to be decided
+about: A question this repository has to answer before code depends on the answer
+title: ''
+labels: ''
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+<!--
+Nothing reads this template. No check parses it, no heading is required, and an
+issue that deletes the whole thing and states the question in three sentences
+passes every check on this repository. It is a prompt for a person, not a gate,
+and it is written down here so that nobody mistakes a filled-in form for a
+checked one.
+
+Delete these comments and the guidance under each heading as you fill it in.
+-->
+
+## What is undecided
+
+<!--
+The question, in one sentence, and what in this repository is waiting on it.
+
+A question nothing is waiting on can be answered later and more cheaply, so say
+what stops if it stays open. Where the answer is not yours to give, say whose it
+is rather than proposing one.
+-->
+
+## The options, and what each costs
+
+<!--
+Every option genuinely on the table, each with what choosing it costs rather than
+what makes it attractive.
+
+An option listed only so that it can be dismissed in the same sentence teaches a
+later reader nothing, and the reader this heading exists for is the one proposing
+that option again in a year.
+
+Numbers carry their commands here as everywhere else:
+
+    <the command>
+    <its output>
+-->
+
+## What the answer forecloses
+
+<!--
+Each option makes one of the others expensive to reach later. Say which.
+
+This is the part that is invisible at the moment of choosing and permanent
+afterwards, and it is the reason the question is worth an issue rather than a
+sentence in a pull request.
+-->
+
+## What done means
+
+<!--
+Where the answer ends up, and what changes once it is there. Usually a record
+under `docs/decisions/`, plus every issue that named this one as what it was
+waiting for.
+
+The shape a record takes, including the reversal condition every one of them
+carries, is in `docs/decisions/0001-decision-records.md`. Do not restate it here;
+a second copy of a format is a copy that drifts.
+-->
diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/problem.md b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/problem.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1328503
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/problem.md
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+---
+name: Something here is wrong
+about: A defect, a gap, or a rule with nothing behind it
+title: ''
+labels: ''
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+<!--
+Nothing reads this template. No check parses it, no heading is required, and an
+issue that deletes the whole thing and says what is wrong in three sentences
+passes every check on this repository. It is a prompt for a person, not a gate,
+and it is written down here so that nobody mistakes a filled-in form for a
+checked one.
+
+Delete these comments and the guidance under each heading as you fill it in.
+-->
+
+## What is wrong
+
+<!--
+The thing that is wrong, in the words somebody reading this in a year would use.
+
+Where it is a gap rather than a defect, say what a reader expects to find and
+what they find instead. Where it is a rule with nothing behind it, say which
+sentence claims the rule and which check was supposed to refuse the violation.
+-->
+
+## The evidence
+
+<!--
+What you saw, rather than what you concluded from it.
+
+Every number here carries the command that produced it, pasted with its output,
+run against the reference a reader will have rather than against a working tree
+that has something else in it:
+
+    <the command>
+    <its output>
+
+That means every number. A count, a duration, a size, a version, a percentage,
+how many files something touches. A sentence with a number and no command is a
+claim, and the difference between a claim and evidence is one line.
+
+Where a claim cannot be backed by a command, write it as a claim and say so,
+rather than writing it as a measurement.
+-->
+
+## What done means
+
+<!--
+The condition under which this issue closes, written so that somebody other than
+you can look at the repository and say whether it has been met.
+
+"Handle this better" is not such a condition. A command that answers differently,
+a file that exists, a check that refuses something it accepts today, or a test
+that reddens when a guard is deleted, are.
+
+Where what is being asked for is a guard, say what it has to refuse. A guard
+nobody has watched fail is a guard nobody knows the direction of.
+-->
+
+## What this waits on
+
+<!--
+Anything this cannot move without: another issue, a decision nobody has taken, a
+setting on the repository that no branch can change. Naming it here is what lets
+a reader tell an issue that is ready from one that is waiting, without opening
+every issue it mentions.
+
+Delete this heading if it waits on nothing.
+-->